GMO Scandal: The Long Term Effects of Genetically Modified Food on Humans
Scientific Tests Must Be Approved by Industry First
By F. William Engdahl
One
of the great mysteries surrounding the spread of GMO plants around the world
since the first commercial crops were released in the early 1990’s in the USA
and Argentina has been the absence of independent scientific studies of
possible long-term effects of a diet of GMO plants on humans or even rats. Now
it has come to light the real reason. The GMO agribusiness companies like
Monsanto, BASF, Pioneer, Syngenta and others prohibit independent research.
An
editorial in the respected American scientific monthly magazine, Scientific American, August 2009
reveals the shocking and alarming reality behind the proliferation of GMO
products throughout the food chain of the planet since 1994. There are no
independent scientific studies published in any reputed scientific journal in
the world for one simple reason. It is impossible to independently verify that
GMO crops such as Monsanto Roundup Ready Soybeans or MON8110 GMO maize perform
as the company claims, or that, as the company also claims, that they have no harmful
side effects because the GMO companies forbid such tests!
That’s
right. As a precondition to buy seeds, either to plant for crops or to use in
research study, Monsanto and the gene giant companies must first sign an End
User Agreement with the company. For the past decade, the period when the
greatest proliferation of GMO seeds in agriculture has taken place, Monsanto,
Pioneer (DuPont) and Syngenta require anyone buying their GMO seeds to sign an
agreement that explicitly forbids that the seeds be used for any independent
research. Scientists are prohibited from testing a seed to explore under what
conditions it flourishes or even fails. They cannot compare any characteristics
of the GMO seed with any other GMO or non-GMO seeds from another company. Most
alarming, they are prohibited from examining whether the genetically modified
crops lead to unintended side-effects either in the environment or in animals
or humans.
The only
research which is permitted to be published in reputable scientific peer-reviewed
journals are studies which have been pre-approved by Monsanto and the other
industry GMO firms.
The entire
process by which GMO seeds have been approved in the United States, beginning
with the proclamation by then President George H.W. Bush in 1992, on request of
Monsanto, that no special Government tests of safety for GMO seeds would be
conducted because they were deemed by the President to be “substantially
equivalent” to non-GMO seeds, has been riddled with special interest
corruption. Former attorneys for Monsanto were appointed responsible in EPA and
FDA for rules governing GMO seeds as but one example and no Government tests of
GMO seed safety to date have been carried out. All tests are provided to the US
Government on GMO safety or performance by the companies themselves such as
Monsanto. Little wonder that GMO sounds to positive and that Monsanto and
others can falsely claim GMO is the “solution to world hunger.”
In the
United States a group of twenty four leading university corn insect scientists
have written to the US Government Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
demanding the EPA force a change to the company censorship practice. It
is as if Chevrolet or Tata Motors or Fiat tried to censor comparative crash
tests of their cars in Consumer Reports
or a comparable consumer publication because they did not like the test
results. Only this deals with the human and animal food chain. The scientists
rightly argue to EPA that food safety and environment protection “depend on
making plant products available to regular scientific scrutiny.” We should
think twice before we eat that next box of American breakfast cereal if the
corn used is GMO .
Continue reading:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/gmo-scandal-the-long-term-effects-of-genetically-modified-food-on-humans/14570
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario