McCain's #BrainCancer #Drama Saves #Obamacare

New York Times: Senate Rejects Slimmed-Down Obamacare Repeal as McCain Votes No

By ROBERT PEAR and THOMAS KAPLAN

REBUTTAL BY

Your favorite analyst here is kicking himself today as the crazed Conspiracy Cat has been hissing at me since last night:

"Ssee! I frickin' told you from the very beginning that McCain'ss cancer act was a sset-up to kill the repeal of ObongoCare!!! But you frickin' censsored me!"

*

From the article:

"Senator John McCain of Arizona, who just this week returned to the Senate after receiving a diagnosis of brain cancer, cast the decisive vote to defeat the proposal, joining two other Republicans, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, in opposing it."

McCain's "stirring" post-cancer-diagnosis speech gave courage and cover to libtarded Republican'tsMurkowski and Collins. ObongoCare was thus saved by a margin of just ONE VOTE!

Yes. It's true. Even as we were wishing slow death upon the "seriously ill" McCain the Insane just 10 days ago, Sugar instictively sensed that the convenient hype over his sudden "brain cancer" was somehow going to be parlayed into saving ObongoCare. I felt that to be too much of a stretch and spiked the rebuttal that she had in mind.

And now, lo and behold, after having returned from the almost-dead to a much publicized hero's welcome in the US Senate, it was McCain who, just days after viciously denouncing pro-repeal radio talk show hosts and internet blogs during his triumphant "return," gave courage to the two liberal Republican't bitches (Ms. Collins & Ms. Murkowski) who joined him in killing the repeal in a very

#ModerateRebels and #ChildRefugees. Dire Situation in the #MiddleEast.

By Global Research News

Url of this article:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/selected-articles-moderate-rebels-and-child-refugees-dire-situation-in-the-middle-east/5509687

 

SELECTED ARTICLES:

Countdown to the Destruction in Syria? Timeline of US and Allied Interventions in Syria (1916-2016)

By Dana Visalli, February 22 2016

“I want to go on record as saying that this is the stupidest, most irresponsible action a diplomatic mission like ours could get itself involved in, and that we’ve started a series of these things that will never end.” Dean Hinton, US State Department official pertaining to planned CIA coup against Syria in 1949. 

“Al Qaeda R Us”: John McCain’s “Moderate Rebels” in Syria are ISIS

The #False #Left / #Right #Paradigm Explained

What exactly is the Hegelian Dialectic?

As the TPP and the TTIP begins to enslave America, it’s important to understand the Hegelian Dialectic and how it was used to pass these “trade” agreements.

What exactly is the Hegelian Dialectic?

Simply put, the dialectic says the human mind can’t understand anything unless it can be split into two polar opposites, i.e. Left / Right.

“For example when people are talking about two political parties, [Republican or Democrat], what they’re actually referring to, without realizing it, is the thesis and the antithesis based off the Hegelian Dialectic,” General Maddox with realnewsaustralia.com wrote. “The only real debate that occurs is just the minor differences between those two parties.” 

“Nothing is said or done about the issues that neither left or right is discussing.”

And establishment insider Carroll Quigley revealed why there doesn’t appear to be much difference between Republican and Democrat presidents.

“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers,” Quigley advocated in his book Tragedy and Hope. “Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extreme shifts in policy.”

#BorisNemtsov #Death #Hoax ?

DEATH HOAX IN RUSSIA!

WHY DOES THE DEAD BODY OF FITNESS ENTHUSIAST BORIS NEMTSOV HAVE A POT BELLY?

WHERE ARE THE BULLET HOLES? WHERE IS THE BLOOD?

NY Times: Boris Nemtsov, Putin Foe, Is Shot Dead in Shadow of Kremlin

By ANDREW E. KRAMER

Mr. Nemtsov, a former first deputy prime minister of Russia, was killed in central Moscow in the highest-profile assassination in Russia during the tenure of President Vladimir V. Putin.

The Anti-New York Times Rebuttal

The Anti-New York Times doesn't miss a trick! The allegedly slain "opposition leader" (traitor) Boris Nemtsov always looked like a slim and trim, well-dressed playboy. Indeed, he was dating a Ukrainian model at the time of his "death", But the poor bloke who was wasted in a Moscow street looks like an out-of-shape "regular guy" - who neither bleeds nor manifests any wounds from the 5 bullets that supposedly hit him.

This man, whoever he is, is not what anyone would consider a fitness fanatic!

WHERE IS THE BLOOD?

A little bit of digging turned up the fact that Nemtsov was a fitness enthusiast, as the photos below clearly indicate. Nemtsov's beach photo even shows a trace of "six-pack abs" - not so the dead version of Mr. Nemtsov. When Vladimir Putin is right in saying that the murder appears to be a "provocation" intended to frame Russia. But what if the dead guy isn't even Boris?

It's way too early to assess this event, but keep in mind that the traitors of Russia are quite powerful; with tentacles reaching into the government, the media, and the Moscow city government and police. Compare the fit Boris to the fat Boris, and see what you think. 

Any friend of McCain the Insane, Timoshenko the Terrible and Porky Poroshenko is no friend of Russia! If Nemtsov really is dead, the dirty traitor got what was coming to him. But is this a trick? Could the dead man have been some poor homeless man used as a double?

FROM LEAN AND FIT....

TO FAT AND FLABBY....

No blood on his right side / No blood on his left side

No blood on the pavement

THEN QUICKLY COVERED UP.....

Let's see what the fake funeral pictures will show!

Now, here's the kicker, from the Daily Mail of UK:

'I'm afraid Putin will kill me': Russian opposition leader said he feared for his life days before being shot dead in drive-by just steps from the Kremlin in front of model Ukrainian girlfriend

• Russian opposition leader had been due to take part in protest tomorrow
• He had been working on report about Russia's involvement in Ukraine
• Hours before death he condemned Putin's 'mad and deadly' policy of war
• Father-of-four's mother, 87, had a premonition that he would be killed
• World leaders including David Cameron have condemned 'callous murder'

After witnessing the "murder" of her suddenly chubby "boyfriend", expect Anna Duritskaya's modeling career to really take off.

Datos Sobre #ISIS Que No Quieren Que Conozcas #EstadoIslamico

tonyfdez.blogspot,com,es

La guerra de EE.UU. dirigida contra el Estado islámico es una gran mentira. El problema de los "terroristas islámicos", llevando a cabo una guerra preventiva en todo el mundo para "proteger a la patria estadounidense" se utiliza para justificar la agenda militar. El Estado Islámico de Irak y Siria (ISIS) es una creación de la inteligencia de Estados Unidos. El "Programa de lucha contra el terrorismo" de Washington en Irak y Siria consiste en apoyar a los terroristas. 

La incursión de las brigadas del Estado Islámico en Irak a partir de junio 2014 fue parte de una operación de inteligencia militar cuidadosamente planeada y secretamente apoyado por los EE.UU., la OTAN e Israel. 

El mandato de lucha contra el terrorismo es una ficción. Estados Unidos es el "estado patrocinador número uno del terrorismo". El Estado Islámico está protegido por los EE.UU. y sus aliados. Si hubieran querido eliminar las brigadas de ISIS, bien podrían haber bombardeado sus convoyes de camionetas de Toyota cuando cruzaron el desierto de Siria a Irak en junio. 

Por cierto, lindas Toyotas!

#Psychopaths, #Basketball Players & #Politicians

Degenerate psychopaths dominate politics.

Tall men dominate basketball.

tomatobubble,com

Recently, your intrepid webmaster had the opportunity to engage in a political discussion with a highly uninformed acquaintance named Ron. He was telling me of his inside knowledge of how corrupt the Mayor of his small town is. His serious allegations didn't surprise me at all. Always trying to steer people towards the "big picture", I stated to Ron that at least half of the people who enter politics are actual undiagnosed psychopaths to begin with. And the worst of the worst inevitably reach the higher levels of government (Congress, Senate, Governors etc); with at least 80% of the high climbers being hard core psychopaths. Not in the metaphorical sense; I mean true clinical psychopaths, albeit undiagnosed. I'm talking about the type of individuals who should either be straight-jacketed and institutionalized in lunatic asylums, or locked away in heavy labor prisons.

Not all psychos are this obvious.

Still under the impression that my rant was intended as an exxagerated metaphor, Ron laughed and responded, "Well, I think you're exxagerating a bit, Mike. But there are some bad apples in Washington, in both Parties."

I held firmly to the 80% figure, and I gave him my reasons: "Ron; let me ask you this. If I were to inform you that 80% of professional basketball players were 6' 5" or taller, would you say I was exaggerating?"

"No; 80% sounds about right. But what does that have to do with politicians?" asked Ron skeptically.

By the time I had finished the rest of my discourse, Ron was nodding his head in enlightened agreement. "I never thought of it that way. I think you're right, Mike!"

Ron might not be ready for full blown conspiracy studies yet, but we'll get there in time!

My case for an 80% psychopathy rate was based upon a very simple analogy to professional basket players. Sometimes, the most effective philosophy is the simplest; like Aesop's Fable for example. My basketball player analogy worked so well on clueless Ron, that I decided to submit an expanded version of this concept to my loyal readers.

You see, most of us "normal people" are able to contain our dark sides; being more 'good' than we are 'bad'. Then there is another group of people who are generally more bad than good, yet not totally evil either. Those are the people we talk about as, "He's a real such and such, but he does have a good side to him." These types can still be salvaged, or at least contained.

Then there is the true psychopath; a heartless, soulless, shameless devil who will smile in your face, charm you and flatter you as he (or she) sticks the knife in your back. He is often charismatic, likable and energetic. He lies effortlessly. He will draw anyone into his orbit that can serve to further his ambitions, or fuel his ego with "narcissistic supply". He manipulates. He cheats. He sucks the lifeblood out of you and then, when you are no longer of any value to him, he will discard you like a used up lemon.

To achieve his nefarious ends, the narcissistic psychopath will play every emotional card in his manipulative arsenal; alternating between outbursts of anger and verbal abuse, empty flattery, fake sympathy for others, false pity for himself, fake smiling or laughing, fake crying, fake humility, false charity and fake piety.

Behold:

ABUSIVE ATTACKS TOWARD 'INFERIORS'

FAKE, PLASTIC SMILING

EXXAGERATED FAKE LAUGHTER

Back To War Against #Syria?

What a difference a year makes!

tomatobubble.com

NY Times: Weary of War, but Favoring Airstrike Plan

By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG

Many Americans agree that ISIS is a threat to the United States, but many wonder whether the country should edge toward another war.

ANTI-NEW YORK TIMES REBUTTAL

What a difference a year makes. And what a difference a pair of fake You Tube 'beheading' videos makes.

It was exactly one year ago that the strong hand of Vladimir Putin, backed by his Chinese friends, coupled with American public opinion to force Obongo and Secretary of State Franken Kerry to suddenly back away from what, at the time, seemed like an almost certain attack upon Syria.

The American people were so opposed to a new war that many of them lit up White House and Congressional switchboards with angry phone calls running 20 to 1 against. Others turned out at 'townhall' meetings to warn their Congressmen and Senators against going to war in Syria.

Angry Americans show up at a 'town hall' to rip John McCain a new butt-hole over his support for bombing Syria

But with a suddenly diverted Russia now being menaced by NATO in eastern Europe, and with China faced with increasingly belligerent US puppets in the form of Japan, Vietnam and Philippines, all it took to bring us back to where we were last year was a pair of the phoniest, most amateurish, most comical, most ridiculous You Tube videos you will ever see. It is almost surreal to realize that these goofy stunts, featuring 'bogeymen' in black and 'journalists' wearing US standard-issue orange prison jump suits, really worked.

But that's Boobus Americanus for you. If it's on TV, it must be true!

Both fake 'beheading' videos cut away just as the throats of the strangely calm 'victims' are about to be cut by the really bad actors in black. The 'victims' didn't even squirm! Intense media pressure builds for Obama to "do something" in order to "stop them". 

As the NY Post headline says: "This Won't Stop Until We Stop Them." Indeed, what moral, self-respecting American would dare to oppose the bombing of the wicked 'beheaders' of ISIS (Israeli Secret Iintelligence Service)? There were no calls and E-mails to DC this time around, and no angry townhall outbursts either.

And who cares that Syria has repeatedly warned that it will consider unauthorized bombings on its territory as an act of aggression? Dr. Assad isn't stupid. He knows what this dirty game is all about. So do the Russians and so do the Chinese. 

Look out Mr. Assad, the heroic American "rescuers" are coming not for ISIS, but for you. Good luck sir.

Saddam (Iraq), Dead / Qaddafi (Libya), Dead / Assad (Syria), still hanging on!

Boston Marathon Pretext Global War on Terrorism

Political Opportunism. The Boston Marathon Tragedy Used as a Pretext To Extend the “Global War on Terrorism”

By Colin Todhunter

In a 2011 interview for an Australian TV channel, US Republican Senator John McCain talked about Islamic extremism ‘spreading’ if left unchecked by military intervention in Afghanistan and elsewhere (1). In the same interview, he spoke of the US having held fast in Iraq and having ‘succeeded’ there. He stated that ‘we’ must do the same in Afghanistan because ‘we’ are succeeding there too. In the warped world of neo-con mouthpieces like McCain, the ongoing carnage and turmoil that US-led criminality has caused in the two countries in question equates with ‘success’ (2)(3)(4)(5).

Given the problems at home, it comes as little surprise that US public support for militarism abroad has been waning for some time (6). McCain is fully aware of this. His comments were little more than an attempt to hoodwink the public into continuing to support the US’s war of global terror because he knows that people have other things on their minds, such as housing foreclosures, the outsourcing of jobs and livelihoods, increasing impoverishment, the crackdown on civil liberties and the slaughter of young (often poor) men who fight wars that have no end in sight. The public is also becoming increasingly aware that over half of government spending goes on the military when it could be better spent in other areas (7).

In 2006, former US military commander and CIA boss General Petraeus said the US strategy is to conduct a war of perceptions continuously through the news media. People like McCain are the foot soldiers in such a war and hope that the public mindset can be manipulated with propaganda about US national security interests, perceived military successes and fear about Islamic extremism.

No doubt both Petraeus and McCain have taken their cue from US commentator Walter Lippmann who in the 1920s said that ‘responsible men’ make decisions and had to be protected from the ‘bewildered herd’ — the public. Lippman believed that the public should be subdued, obedient and distracted from what is really happening and should be admiring with awe the leaders who save them from destruction and provide peace. The words of Lippman might have been ringing loud and clear in the minds of many observers as people came onto the streets of Boston to celebrate and chant “USA!USA!” after the authorities had suspended civil liberties and effectively implemented Martial Law in the aftermath of the Boston Marathon explosions. Saved from destruction and admiring their leaders with awe!

After a decade of creeping ‘war fatigue’ among the public, the recent bomb blasts in Boston comes as a timely and convenient reminder to US citizens that the ‘war on terror’ must be maintained. What better than a terrible short, sharp shock in Boston to sleep-walk them back towards this version of ‘reality’?

Much has been written about the two men who are allegedly responsible for the attack in Boston. The US media has gone out of its way to speculate on links with Chechnya and even Iran. Despite no proof of Iranian involvement, it’s always a good thing to throw the latest US designated bogeyman into the mix in order to demonise it and keep the public’s mind focused and supportive of continued action against it.

With all the talk of extremist Islamic terror and enemies of the US who may have been behind the attack, the mainstream media has ignored the role of the US government itself when it comes to terror attacks within the US. Such a task has been left to analysts such as Michael German and James Corbett, who have written on how FBI sting operations make jihadists out of gullible Muslims and hapless malcontents (8)(9). They document many examples of how the FBI has infiltrated, nurtured and encouraged rag tag groups to devise terror plots on US soil. It is therefore of interest that the FBI had also been monitoring the two Boston bomb suspects for a number of years (10)(11).

Without the FBI, many half baked ‘terror plots’ against the US on its own soil might never have existed at all. In true Lippman-esque style, however, the publicity surrounding such schemes and the media celebration of ‘heroic’ government agencies foiling them serve to create or strengthen public perceptions about an ongoing threat in order to keep the public on side. Indeed, in the wake of the Boston bombings the influential Council of Foreign Relations has voiced the opinion that the event once again raises the specter of terrorism on US soil, thereby highlighting the vulnerabilities of a free and open society.

Such statements and the mainstream media, with all its wild speculations and accusations concerning events in Boston, act to condition the public to continue to support the ‘war on terror’. And that involves the notion that the US is under constant threat at home and abroad therefore civil liberties must be curtailed (in the name of a ‘free and open society’!) in order to prevent terror. It also involves the notion that imperialist wars thinly disguised as a global war on terror must be continued.

Regardless of who is ultimately responsible for the attack in Boston, whether it was individuals acting alone or whether they were being guided by other players, the attack has served to propagate the myth about the need for ongoing US militarism and has probably conveniently served to counter waning public support for it.

Notes

1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5QiZSZmcV4

2) http://:www.globalresearch.ca/iraq-crimes-against-humanity-the-babies-will-haunt-us/5316119

3) http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/19/iraq-make-it-impossible-to-unleash-barbarism

4) http://www.countercurrents.org/polya051209.htm

5) http://stopwar.org.uk/index.php/afghanistan-and-pakistan/1878-a-weekend-of-carnage-in-afghanistan-but-the-pointless-and-lost-war-goes-on

6) http://www.ipsnews.net/2006/09/us-9-11-poll-finds-waning-faith-in-military-interventions/

7) http://www.globalresearch.ca/more-than-50-of-us-government-spending-goes-to-the-military/18852

8) http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34322.htm

9)http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-boston-bombings-in-context-how-the-fbi-fosters-funds-and-equips-american-terrorists/5331872

10) http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ARE9rclZCqw#!

11) http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324763404578433113880189762.html 

Video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-5QiZSZmcV4

Donald Rumsfeld Proves Iraq War Started on False Pretenses

http://www.infowars.com/newly-released-memo-by-donald-rumsfeld-proves-iraq-war-started-on-false-pretenses/

 

Everyone Knew Iraq Had No WMDS … and Was Not Behind Anthrax Attacks or 9/11

Everyone knew that Iraq didn’t have weapons of mass destruction.

Indeed, Secretary of State Colin Powell’s chief of staff – Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson – just said that Powell knew that there were no WMDs:

I wonder what will happen when we put 500,000 troops into Iraq and comb the country from one end to the other and find nothing

It has been extensively documented that the White House decided to invade Iraq before 9/11:

Former CIA director George Tenet said that the White House wanted to invade Iraq long before 9/11, and inserted “crap” in its justifications for invading Iraq. Former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill – who sat on the National Security Council – also says that Bush planned the Iraq war before 9/11. Top British officials say that the U.S. discussed Iraq regime change even before Bush took office. And in 2000, Cheney said a Bush administration might “have to take military action to forcibly remove Saddam from power.” And see this.

Cheney made Iraqi’s oil fields a national security priority before 9/11. And the Sunday Herald reported: “Five months before September 11, the US advocated using force against Iraq … to secure control of its oil.” (remember that Alan Greenspan, John McCain, George W. Bush, Sarah Palin, a high-level National Security Council officer and others all say that the Iraq war was really about oil.)

Indeed, neoconservatives planned regime change in Iraq – and throughout the Middle East and North Africa – 20 years ago.

George W. Bush, John McCain, Sarah Palin, a high-level National Security Council officer, Alan Greenspan and others all say that the Iraq war was really about oil.

But war is sold just like soda or toothpaste … and so a false justification needs to be concocted.

The government tried to falsely blame the anthrax attacks on Iraq as a justification for war:

When Congress was originally asked to pass the Patriot Act in late 2001, the anthrax attacks which occurred only weeks earlier were falsely blamed on spooky Arabs as a way to scare Congress members into approving the bill. Specifically:

The FBI was actually told to blame Anthrax scare on Al Qaeda by White House officials

High-level government insiders pointed towards Iraq as the source of the anthrax, even though there was absolutely no reason to think that the anthrax had come from Iraq

And:

George Bush throughout 2002 routinely featured “anthrax” as one of Saddam’s scary weapons.

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, President Bush and VP Cheney all falsely linked Iraq with 9/11 … and the entire torture program was aimed at establishing such a false linkage.

A new book by NBC News and Newsweek investigative reporter Michael Isikoff adds details, including a memo written by Rumsfeld in November 2001 – a year and a quarter before the start of the Iraq war – asking how to start a war against Iraq, and suggesting as one potential “justification” for war:

How start?

***

US discovers Saddam connection to Sept. 11 attack or to anthrax?