ALISON DID NOT WORK AT STATION FOR MORE THAN
TWO WEEKS BEFORE THE PSY OP
(Scroll Down)
Crisis actors!
(Scroll Down)
I am now going to dig in and state with clarity blanks were used
Jim Stone
James wrote:
I watched the alison parker video ... take it from someone (me) who
knows about guns ... the shooter had used the gun before with real
bullets ... watch as the gun learches FORWARD with each round ... these
are blanks ... the shooter is bracing for the inevitable backwards
impulse as the gun would release a real bullet ... BUT there is no real
bullet so the gun lurches forward with each round because the shooter is
reacting to what his instinct would say would be a real round ... but
since there is no real round the gun thrusts forward ... watch the video
again ... jim
My response: Ok, now I will say this: There is too much smoke and too much fire at the end of the barrel, which proves blanks.
To the left here is the frame that proves this is blanks being fired,
there is simply TOO MUCH FIRE at the end of the barrel and the color of
the flame is totally wrong for real bullets, that is the color of flame
from blanks, which is similar to the flame from black powder:
No camera shake also proves blanks.
DURING
DAYLIGHT, IT IS USUALLY DIFFICULT TO SEE MUZZLE FLASH FROM REAL BULLETS
USING MODERN SMOKELESS POWDER, AND THAT IS ALL THERE IS NOWADAYS.
However, muzzle flash from blanks shows up clearly, and this is what we
see here to the left. OOOH, SCARY LOOKING, but IT PROVES BLANKS, as
does the excessive smoke which I have NEVER seen from any real round I
have fired and I have shot thousands and thousands and thousands of
rounds and I mean freaking THOUSANDS with hand guns, shot guns, rifles,
you name it I have owned it, I have never seen smoke with modern (and I
am talking past 50 years) bullets and always see it with blanks which I
have also shot. WHAT SMOKES? OLD SCHOOL BLACK POWDER.
This is the
difference between blanks, which have to use black powder or something
similar because it will
