http://www.globalresearch.ca/on-the-road-to-damascus-an-eyewitness-report/5336070
By Antonio C. S. Rosa
I participated, May 1-11, 2013 in the Mussalaha International Peace Delegation to Lebanon-Syria
alongside fellow TRANSCEND member Nobel Peace Laureate Mairead Maguire,
from Ireland, and 15 others from eight countries. Keenly aware of my
responsibility, especially to my newly made Syrian and Lebanese friends
left behind, I shall try to report, describe, make sense of what I saw,
heard and experienced; also offer views and insights based on
interviews. However, this report will take more than one article.
First impressions first: the people, the civil society, women, men,
the youth, elderly, children, workers, the Arab street, as it is called.
It was disconcerting coming into the country for the first time knowing
what I thought I knew and seeing a calm, positive demeanor in people,
which could well be misconstrued as apathy, yet exhibiting expectant,
concerned, awaiting eyes and facial expressions. After some time I
noticed a striking absence of anger or negative excitement in the air;
people going about their daily business as if nothing was happening, as if
life were normal. No cries for revenge against their many external
aggressors, no fists in the air, no demonstrations against a dictator,
no pleading or denouncing slips of paper passed to me surreptitiously by
nervous, fearful hands. Eye contacts revealed seriousness, curiosity,
kindness, hope, hospitality, happiness in seeing strangers. No public
laughs or smiles though. Heavy hearts do not allow for such frivolities.
Syrian people are suffering, they are sad, stuck, against the wall,
being victimized for which they bear no responsibility. They just don’t
know why they are being threatened, attacked, killed, tortured, and
humiliated so viciously from so many fronts. The concept of proxy war is
alien to them even though they are at its core. Fear of violence can be
more psychologically and emotionally damaging than the real thing.
Understandably, they are afraid of talking in public and being later
identified and targeted by jihadists.
But then again, that is always the case, isn’t? Who cares about
unimportant people when so many more pressing factors are in play? Like
the obscene profits made by the oil multinationals, the 7 sisters
cartel, and the preservation of wasteful lifestyles of peoples from
richer, more powerful nations that need –and will take by any means
necessary– the oil that Syrians at this juncture unfortunately have
underneath their feet?
Disconcerting as well was to find a country bursting with activity
and life, children in playgrounds or walking to school in their
uniforms, open air markets filled with people, heavy traffic, buses
running, life happening in and around Damascus. Disconcerting because I
had psyched myself to find a country in ruins, people fleeing for their
lives from bombs, tanks on the streets, a police state massacring its
own citizens, large scale suffering, buildings demolished, people
resisting the government by force, and so on. Yet, I saw none of the
above; quite the opposite. But you will forgive my ignorance, for I am a
Westerner and that is what we hear, watch and read in our corporate
media, which without a pinch of shame, honesty or humanity tell us half
truths, innuendoes, straight lies, and party-line talking-points uttered
by talking heads about what is happening on this part of the world. And
I stand guilty of believing them like a fool. Nonetheless, the country
has been as if divided by checkpoints in every strategic entrance and
exit. To give an idea, our Damascus hotel was surrounded by six
different checkpoints strategically located around it. Armed personnel
and soldiers on the streets is a common sight that adds to a sense of
security.
Mairead and Mother Agnès-Maryam Soeur (our leaders) met
privately with Syrian armed fighters and we were introduced to some
persons victimized by their atrocities. Audiences included: Syrian Prime
Minister Mr. Wael Al Halki, Deputy PM and Minister of Economic Affairs
Mr. Qadri Jameel (opposition), Minister of Health Dr. Saed Anayef,
Minister of Social Affairs Ms. Kinda Al-Shammat (a pleasant and
intelligent young lady), Minister of Justice Dr. Najem Hamad Al-Ahmad,
Minister of Information Mr. Omran Ahed Al-Zouabi, Minister of Foreign
Affairs Mr. Walid Muallem, the Syrian Ambassador to Lebanon Mr. Ali Abd
Karim Ali, the Iranian ambassador to Lebanon, and General Michael Aoun,
an influential Lebanese party leader (who is rumored to discriminate
against Palestinian refugees).
We visited the People’s Council of Syria (parliament), hospitals,
refugee camps, were briefed by senior field coordinator Maeve Murphy at
the UNHCR intake center in Zahleh-Lebanon, and met with a representative
of the Syrian Arab Red Crescent, and with ambulance drivers and health
workers. We were also welcomed by some ten leaders from various
religions, sects and faiths, were greeted in churches and mosques, and I
talked with common folks every time an opportunity presented in shops
and in the streets. I talked with an active member of the political
opposition to the present regime. He was in prison for 24 years,
released 11 years ago, and wants changes—but without outside interference
as he told to me textually. The 71 year-old kind and intelligent
gentleman who declined to give his name also told me he did not marry
and have children because he was in prison, and he was ashamed of that.
ACTORS AND PARTIES TO THE CONFLICT
A deeper contextual assessment and analysis within a peace
studies/conflict resolution paradigm would require more time and
research into the complexities of the conflicts (in the plural)
vis-à-vis the newest perceptions, facts and evidences acquired herein;
the majority of actors are not evident whereas the main, deadliest ones
are shielded by ‘deniability.’ However, they are all known—and very
active. Of one thing you may rest assured: Bashar al-Assad is not the
sole culprit, THE bad guy in this saga. He is a well liked leader all
over, which is evident in different cities, in talks with differing
kinds of persons, and by their attitudes and actions. Body languages,
eye contacts, non-verbal messages work wonders in bringing hidden
messages to the surface. Billboards with his picture are spread
throughout the land and they are clean, well preserved. One does not see
graffiti over them, obscenities or anything like that. Syrians in
general show pride in having a handsome leader, an eye doctor who is not
a sanguinary dictator like Saddam Hussein was. I would assume that in
the present context even those who oppose him are on his side to defend
Syria’s integrity as a functioning society.
Quoting Johan Galtung [i]: “An image of the goals of some outside parties:
- Israel: wants Syria divided in smaller parts, detached from Iran, status quo for Golan Heights, and a new map for the Middle East;
- USA: wants what Israel wants and control over oil, gas, pipelines;
- UK: wants what USA wants;
- France: co-responsible with the UK for post-Ottoman colonization in the area, wants confirmed friendship France-Syria;
- Russia: wants a naval base in the Mediterranean, and an “ally”;
- China: wants what Russia wants;
- EU: wants both what Israel-USA want and what France wants;
- Iran: wants Shia power;
- Iraq: majority Shia, wants what Iran wants;
- Lebanon: wants to know what it wants;
- Saudi-Arabia: wants Sunni power;
- Egypt: wants to emerge as the conflict-manager;
- Qatar: wants the same as Saudi Arabia and Egypt;
- Gulf States: want what USA-UK want;
- The Arab League: wants no repetition of Libya, tries human rights;
- Turkey: wants to assert itself relative to the (Israel-USA) successors to the (France-UK-Italy) successors to the Ottoman Empire, and a buffer zone in Syria.
- UN: wants to emerge as the conflict manager.
Every single statement here can be challenged and challenged again.
But let us for the sake of the mental experiment assume that this image,
with 16 outside and five inside parties, is more right than wrong.”
The Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Economic Affairs, Mr. Kadri
Jameel, is a Communist Kurd elected on the opposition party platform.
He came to talk to the delegation at the 5-star hotel where we stayed in
Damascus. He affirmed that his electoral victory represented a foot on
the door for further changes, which envisioned a multiparty political
system. I talked with four members of his security detail. One of them,
26, showed me his wound: a bullet entered through his backside and
exited through his neck, which had been broken as he was attacked by
foreign fighters coming from Turkey at a Palestinian refugee camp in
Latakia on Aug, 2011 when he was still in the army. Although army
officers, they guard the leader of the opposition. I was told by them
that these armed gangs of trouble makers target especially the
minorities (Druze, Christians, Shia) in hopes that they turn against the
government.
“As the government moves to a multi-party system, a
non-territorial federation with two chambers, one for provinces and the
other for nations, with vetoes in matters of vital concern might be
useful.” [ii]
In addition, as much as I tried, no one leader could or would answer
my two basic questions: What is the source of this conflict? What are
the solutions? Perhaps it was so because all our audiences, meetings,
visits, and so forth were made in groups: our delegation, composed of 16
invitees from seven countries, our hosts, the press (which at times
stole the whole show all for themselves), plus the heavily armed
security around us everywhere around the clock, sometimes annoyingly so.
Thus no conversations or even follow-up questions were ever
entertained. But I got a generalized reply based and around a single
theme: “The violence must stop!” Moreover, few of the leaders spoke
English. Thus a lot of our ‘conversations’ was lost or truncated in the
interpreting process. What stands out is that almost all of the various
leaders and people in general seem to agree that the major, perhaps only
problem facing the country is the (contained) violence and threat
thereof. Not could be farther from the truth, though. So I will stay
more at the surface in this overview of our visit.
Galtung’s bird’s eye view of the situation (in Syria, TMS 29 Apr 2013):
“Over this looms a dark cloud: Syria is in the zone between
Israel-USA-NATO and Shanghai Cooperation Organization-SCO
[Russia-China], both expanding.
“Then, an image of the goals of some inside parties:
- Alawis (15%): want to remain in power, “for the best of all” (Assad’s power base);
- Shias in general: want the same;
- Sunnis: want majority rule, their rule, democracy;
- Jews, Christians, minorities: want security, fearing Sunni rule;
- Kurds: want high level autonomy, some community with other Kurds.”
However, Susan Dirgham, a delegate from Australia, offers a qualification:
“Much of the propaganda in Australia that leads to young Sunni
Lebanese Australians to go to Syria for jihad relies on claims that in
Syria you have an Alawi minority suppressing a Sunni majority. My
understanding is that most of the ministers are in fact Sunni and the
business elite with the economic power in Syria is also mostly Sunni.
According to
“The Information Minister, Dr Al-Zouabi, is Sunni (not Alawi, as claimed).
“The Foreign Minister, Walid Muallem, is Sunni (not Greek Orthodox, as claimed).
“The Deputy PM and Minister for Economic Affairs Qadri Jamil is Kurdish, as stated, and Communist (not Alawi as claimed).
“It is interesting that the religion of the Minister for Social Affairs Ms. Kinda Al-Shammat is not listed though one would assume she is Sunni because of her white hijab and the way she wears it.”
REFUGEES
The Syrian state and its population are being indirectly attacked by US/EU/NATO/UN; and directly by Israel, HERE and also HERE,
by the autocratic dictatorships of the GCC-Gulf Cooperation Council:
Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, UAE (mostly Sunni Muslims)
in partnership with Turkey (secular), and by Al Qaeda plus a diversity
of mercenary jihadists (by definition terrorist groups), each with its
own agenda, recruited from 29 countries and paid by GCC/CIA. Syrians are
also assailed by UN sanctions and an embargo, and by a foreign press
bent on demonizing, lying, destabilizing the country (not merely the
regime). The mercenaries fight among themselves to grab the moneys
channeled from the CIA and other American institutions via GCC and/or
Turkey. Weapons enter Syria hidden in Turkish ambulances posing as such.
US cash provides weapons and logistics, fund mercenaries, pay for
jihadists. Bands of jihadists armed to the teeth invade Syria through
Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon (Tripoli). Turkey opened its Syrian borders
to them and, through terror, they displace the populations forcing them
to take refuge back in Turkey in an effort to destabilize Syria. Turkey,
in fact, invites Syrian refugees into the country. It is documented
that Syrian refugees in Turkey are mistreated, have their organs removed
(stolen), children sold for forced marriage or else. There are an
estimated 50,000 foreign jihadist fighters terrorizing Syria’s
countryside: snipers, bombers, agitators. They torture and kill men who
refuse to join them. In their religious fundamentalism they believe that
any Muslim they kill will automatically and immediately achieve
paradise; they are actually doing them a favor (!). There is a score of
young Europeans on their ranks as well (Germans, Dutch, British,
Australians).
We visited and talked with a chief of family, refugee in Lebanon and
saw twenty people living in a space roughly 6×6 without ventilation, a
room inside a warehouse, for which they pay the equivalent of 400
dollar/month. One filthy kitchen, one bathroom. And that is that. They
are on their own to find work and everything else. Some resort to
stealing and committing petty crimes to survive. This is typical, not
an exception. And he explained that in his native Homs jihadists take
over their houses, rape their women, and kill young males who refuse to
join their ranks. Chechens, Afghanis, Pakistanis, Lebanese, Jordanians,
Turkish, Europeans compose these gangs armed, fed and maintained by the
above mentioned foreign governments. He said they attach suicide vests
around peoples’ bodies and threaten to explode them if they don’t do
what they are told. Underneath a rather dignified posture, he was
scared, terrorized. Yet we kept hearing the same mantra over and over:
“I want to go back home, I don’t belong here.” It was truly
heartbreaking, and I felt helpless in the face of it. Bearing witness we
were.
In one of the refugee camps we visited in Lebanon
(more aptly called a concentration camp) we talked with a couple from
Homs–he being a pharmacist and engineer–who had their house and business
blown up due to terrorist activities. Now they live by charity in the
Bekaa Valley-Lebanon, under a tent and with nothing but the clothes over
their bodies. They are not allowed to work, own property, have a
dignified life. There is no sanitation and there are check points with
armed soldiers at the gates. Multiply this by about 1.5 million and you
will have an approximate dimension of the human tragedy. We visited the
Sabra Palestinian refugee camp as well, of the infamous Sabra-Shatila
massacre by Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in September 1982, on
the outskirts of Beirut. In addition we toured the UN High Commission
for Refugees intake center in Zahleh, Lebanon, next to Bekaa valley and
were briefed by Maeve Murphy, UNHCR senior field coordinator. She said
that there is a staff of 50 workers to deal with an influx of 1,500
refugees a day.
This is how it works, according to Prime Minister Wael Al Halki
himself, with whom we spent 2.5 hours and with him doing most of the
talk to explain in detail and with statistics and evidences what is
really happening for the last two years. Jihadists take a village by
assault, kill public officials, take over private houses in which to
hide, burn plantations, spread terror and devastation. Their aim is
simple: to render the country as ungovernable as they possibly can,
disrupt normal life, destroy institutions, livestock, people. They
occupy hospitals forcing medical personnel to look only after foreign
fighters, not allowing wounded locals or government soldiers to be
treated. This has created a wave of refugees from a total population of
21.9 million. Internal displacement is calculated at 1.5 million people.
And 600,000 external refugees according to the Minister of Social
Affairs, Ms Kinda Al-Shammat (estimate). But the UNHCR provides an
official estimate of 1.5 million refugees spread over the different
neighboring countries as follows:
- Jordan: 471.677;
- Lebanon: 469.217;
- Turkey: 347.157;
- Iraq: 146.951;
- Egypt: 66.922.
GOVERNMENT RETALIATION
Syrian authorities on the other hand reacted to the rampant and
aggressive terrorism through a policy they call ‘iron hand.’ Tanks,
artillery and infantry descend in force on the places that foreign
fighters keep under siege and blow up the buildings where they hide,
keep armaments and snipers. However, before striking the buildings
fliers are thrown from helicopters advising residents to leave the area,
what is not always possible because the terrorists use them as human
shields, keeping them under captivity inside their own residences.
Collateral damage is high, it is a policy many consider unacceptable.
But given the odds he said it is the best alternative. And this method,
as brutal as it is, is bearing fruits as the terrorists are being
decimated or otherwise driven farther and farther from populated areas.
The minister of justice said textually: “Those who invade us to kill and
destroy our country will not leave Syria alive.” But the jihadists still occupy and keep under siege many localities.
If compared to the US retaliation to the 9/11/2001 terrorist attacks
against the World Trade Center, killing millions, invading other
countries, and lingering still 12 years later through drone attacks and
selective assassinations, such ‘iron hand’ policies are mild (without
condoning the violence, that is). Those are, therefore, the demolished
buildings shown ad nauseam and out of context, over and over on CNN,
BBC, FOX and the rest of them.
According to Paul Larudee, a delegate from the USA:
“Most of the men and some of the women do not want to be
photographed, but the children don’t mind. Several people from Qusayr, a
town on the Lebanese border said that when the demonstrations first
began two years ago, they were nonviolent and the local officials would
even clear the roads for them. However, as they became more violent,
the central government failed to act and the town was eventually overrun
by armed local elements and foreign fighters from Chechnya, Azerbaijan
and other places. It was only after the population fled that Syrian
troops finally came to quell the rebellion, which has apparently not yet
been fully accomplished. I have no way to assess the accuracy
of these stories, nor to generalize them, but at least my modest Arabic
skills allow me to strike up conversations with whomever I want, and
there are no government minders in Lebanon. Nevertheless, we all want
to meet with groups that have a very different story to tell, and Mother
Agnès-Maryam has included such opportunities in our schedule, even
Jabhat al-Nusrah, the al-Qaeda affiliate, with whom none of us expected
to be able to speak.”
There is also the case of a boy shot by snipers in a street and whose
body was whisked away by photographers who then made a video of his
death; of his dying actually, fleeing afterwards and leaving the corpse
behind. Medical personnel said afterwards that he could have been saved
if taken to a hospital instead of to the killing fields’ improvised TV
studio. The result of such filth is sold to TV networks for your and my
robotized consumption. Yet as the PM asserted, the workers are being
paid on time, schools, universities, public offices continue operating,
and the government is able to maintain a somewhat normal life under such
extenuating circumstances. As we toured the city or participated in
meetings, we would hear loud booms at a distance, sometimes seeing
clouds of black smoke rising from the bombed sites, or else, sounds of
gun fights. We taped some of these with our cell phones. ‘Necessary
evil,’ I was told, as I asked a gentleman in a restaurant, what he
thought about such retaliatory bombings. People in fact don’t pay much
attention to them. The UN says nearly 70,000 people have been killed
since the foreign fighters entered the country and started the armed
conflict in March 2011.
Another important point made by delegate Susan Dirgham:
“I don’t remember anyone we met supporting an arms embargo
against the state. We were reminded by the Melkite Patriarch that the
selling of arms to the state is legal. If it were stopped, the enemies
of Syria would surely win. I think what united everyone I met in
Damascus was support for the state + dialogue. This view was
shared by people from different backgrounds and by those who supported
the president and the current government and those who didn’t, such as
the members of the “Third Current” I spoke with. They may not have
supported some of the tactics of the army or security etc, but they
supported the right for Syria to defend itself from outside aggression
and to remain in a position where it can defend its people and
territory. It seems as though we are being balanced and peace-loving
when we support an arms embargo on both sides, but actually to support
an embargo against Syria without also supporting the same for all
countries in the region, including Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, etc.
would not be helpful. Syria would collapse and be destroyed by its
enemies if its army didn’t have the military hardware to defend the
people and country, firstly against the 50,000 foreign
jihadists/mercenaries, etc. and then against the states that work to
destroy and dismember it.”
On one occasion an IED-Improvised Explosive Device exploded about 10
minutes after our delegation had left the Patriarchate of the Melkite
Greek Catholic Church (our hosts throughout), where we had attended an
ecumenical prayer for peace. I was shown photos immediately after, sent
by cell phone, of blood on the floor from people killed and injured from
the attack. Such is life in Damascus to which, after a short 10-day
visit, we were getting somewhat used to. Understanding drives away
outrage and harsh judgmental assumptions and conclusions. Mairead
Maguire, who talked in private with four Syrian armed combatants, said
they told her they took up arms against the government because they were
unemployed; one of them with five children. Al Qaida offered them
money. They took the offer and started killing fellow Syrians. Moreover,
three shots were fired against the car of the leader/organizer of the
peace mission, Mother Agnès-Mariam Soeur, a Melkite nun, on Sat. May 11,
2013 as she traveled to her native Homs, the hotspot city where her
monastery was destroyed by terrorist activities.
Delegate Paul Larudee reports:
“There was the celebrated case of a nine-year-old Christian boy
named Sari Saoud, killed by rebels in Homs. His body was taken by the
rebels, but his mother, Georgina al-Jammal caught up with them, and her
embrace of her dead son was captured on video by the rebels, who then
falsified the account to make it appear that the boy had been killed by
government forces.
I talked with Georgina, who supports the government, but blames
it for leaving the area without protection. She told me that she
recognized some of the rebels from the neighborhood, but that others
were strangers.”
CONCLUSION
A positive note: we were gifted with a VIP visit to the famous
Umayyad Mosque in the old city of Damascus, fourth-holiest place after
Mecca, where is located the tomb and shrine of St John the Baptist right
at the center of the huge 4,000 year-old construction that had
previously been a temple of Jupiter in Roman times and the Basilica of
Saint John the Baptist. This mosque is at the end of the famous Road to
Damascus, of St Paul’s conversion, which we walked by foot seeing the
exact spot of the event. Upon exiting the mosque complex one could see
another building erected by Saladin (1174–1193), also buried in Umayyad.
This was just one of many fascinating experiences afforded us by our
hosts being demonized and targeted for invasion and occupation by the
West. They are understandably worried that invading marines wouldn’t
have what it takes to appreciate such a wealth of history, art,
religious traditions, faiths, civilization, and would most probably raze
it to the ground as they have done elsewhere in Iraq, Libya,
Afghanistan. Right they are. We were hosted by the head of Umayyad, the
Grand Mufti of the Syrian Arab republic, Dr. Ahmad Badr Al-Din Hassoun
and by the Greek Catholic Patriarch Gregory III Laham, who organized and
hosted our whole trip along with Mussalaha.
We arrived in Lebanon during the holy week of the Eastern Orthodox
Churches and spent their Easter Sunday (5 May) as guests of one of the
many Christianities of the Middle East, where it all began. An added
treat.
The Mussalaha International Peace Delegation to Syria issued
a Concluding Declaration. Being from varying backgrounds, delegates did
not agree on everything and one of them did not sign it. Therefore: no
groupthink and no possibility of collective brainwashing of our group by
Syrian authorities. And Mairead Maguire’s messages to the media, as the
Nobel Peace laureate head of the delegation, remained impeccable and on
point. She started all interviews with affirmations to the effect that,
“It is for the Syrian people to decide about their own problems,
their own destiny, their own politics, their own leadership and form of
government. No one has de right to interfere in their internal affairs
and all foreign forces must withdraw and stay away. The flow of arms and
armed fighters must be stopped, sanctions must be lifted, and if the
arms embargo should remain in place, it ought to all parties involved,
not just to the Syrian government that has a right to defend itself from
foreign aggression. Are the foreign bands of invaders that are killing
and terrorizing the population. All parties must follow the rules of
international law.”
I find it disgraceful that our Western governments, led by
US-EU-Israel and their client states, be full and willing partners in
such atrocities perpetrated in name of ‘human rights,” “democracy,”
“rule of law,” “freedom,” “liberty,” and other such meaningless,
trivialized euphemisms. The present political and economic structures,
embedded in the machinery of predatory militarism and capitalism,
present us with only one choice, the lesser evil; but that is an
artificial construct. Gandhi, Mandela, Luther King, Lula and many others
are proof that changes and transformation are envisioned, given form
and arise from below, from the ranks of the oppressed and minorities,
from a non co-opted periphery, and not from within the belly of an
empire of banks and bases seeking unlimited profits and hegemonic
powers—for their own sake. Policies must again be made to endeavor the
wellbeing of human beings, of life, not the perpetuation of structures
and cultures that by necessity have to go. At other times in history
piracy, slavery and absolute monarchy, for instance, also represented
the status quo, the law; but they are no more. Nonviolent resistance and actions throughout the cultural-structural apparatus are the
means to turn this tide, which is taking our planet and all its life to
the abyss. We must choose life and peace by peaceful means, resist we
must; and we will!
The formula is given by Galtung: Equity, Harmony, Trauma Reconciliation, Conflict Resolution:
+ Positive Peace Equity X Harmony
Peace = ________________ = _________________
– Negative Peace Trauma X Conflict
“For Syria, what comes to mind is a Swiss solution. One Syria,
federal, with local autonomy, even down to the village level, with
Sunnis, Shias and Kurds having relations to their own across the
borders. International peacekeeping, also for the protection of
minorities. And non-aligned, which rules out foreign bases and flows of
arms, but does not rule out compulsory arbitration for the Golan
Heights (and June 1967 in general), with Israeli UN membership at stake. The search could be for solutions, not for the
solution. Let 1,000 dialogues blossom, in each quarter, each village,
enriching the gross national idea product, GNIP. UN-supported
facilitators, with knowledge of mediation, rather than with guns and
binoculars.” [iii]
Like Paul meeting the angel Ananias on his way to Damascus
experienced a change of heart and became St Paul, so have I met many
angels on my own Road to Damascus and, although not gone into sainthood,
I have reinterpreted and upgraded my own vision of reality—which I now
share with you.
[i] Johan Galtung, Syria, TRANSCEND Media Service, 29 April, 2013.
[ii] Galtung, Turkey-Cyprus-Kurds-Armenia-SYRIA, 15 Oct, 2012, TRANSCEND Media Service.
[iii] Galtung, Syria, TRANSCEND Media Service, 29 April, 2013.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario