Disgusting! #Germanwings

jimstone,is

Great. JUST GREAT. Now we get to stand by as top government manipulators play with the mind of a girlfriend to see what they can get it to spew. Eventually, they will have her spewing about Islam. The biggest statement they are using now is that at one time the "crash pilot" told her that he wanted to change the world. Perhaps that is a true statement, but how many people say that? To say that means he is going to crash a plane is B.S.

Additionally, they are lying about the antidepressants. This pilot was not depressed and not taking psych meds. Absolutely nothing of substantive proof is out there about this, which means he simply was not taking them. EMPTY ZOLOFT BOX OR IT IS ALL B.S. But the clincher is THE COCKPIT DOOR, WHICH HAS A KEYPAD IN THE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT THAT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE PILOTS TO LOCK ANYONE OTHER THAN A PROSPECTIVE HIJACKER AND PASSENGERS OUT. THE ENTIRE CABIN CREW HAS THE PASSWORD AS WELL AS THE PILOTS AND CAN GET IN EVEN IF THE PILOTS KEEP THE DOORLOCKED FROM THE COCKPIT SIDE. This proves Remi lied lied LIED, why and HOW did he lie? 

"When the flight crew does not respond to requests for entry, the door can also be unlocked by the cabin crew, by entering a two to seven-digit code (programmed by the airline) on the keypad, installed on the lateral side of the Forward Attendant Panel (FAP)".

MATT DRUDGE, I AM CALLING YOU OUT. IF YOU REALLY ARE MISSING THIS YOU NEED A CRANIAL ENEMA. DITTO FOR ANYONE ELSE WHO CLAIMS TO REPORT THE TRUTH. Even if you don't believe the remote control capabilities, it is NOW PROVEN THAT THE SUICIDE PILOT STORY IS A BIG FAT LIE, they faked the recording, that is all there is to it and to keep parroting that lie is FRAUD. YOU HAVE A FRAUDULENT WEB SITE DRUDGE. YOU REPORT LIES, THE A320 OPERATOR MANUAL PROVES IT.

And what other time was there a proven fake recording made for a plane crash? Why, the call from Cee Cee Lyle, flight 93, on 911.

CeeCee's call sets a STARK precedent here:

Permanent: 911 Flight 93 phone call busted. CeeCee Lyle read her arab incriminating yet fully scripted phone call from the ground, in a call center, and if you listen to the call, you can hear her coach say "that was great!" after she finishes speaking. You can also hear a coach or manager say "allright" in the background of the enhanced version, and AFTER THAT you can hear her coach say "sorry" for saying "that was great" too loud and possibly having it be audible in the message. CeeCee Lyle flight 93 911 phone call enhanced and original This kills the entire arab/911 meme, obviously the calls were faked. But that won't do it for Drudge, BET ON IT!

UPDATE: I pay no attention to Gordon Duff, but got one of his reports in the mail. He is on board with this

completely and passed the sniff test overwhelmingly this time, having also spoken of the full remote takeover abilities on this crashed aircraft. Remi is a liar, NO IFS OR BUTS, and if any truther is not talking about remote control and the fact that the cockpit door can't lock out ANYONE on the airline staff, they are trolls, now is a good chance to ditch them. LITMUS TEST TIME.

Someone killed a big lie for me - the cockpit door!

Someone dredged this up from A320 user manuals, and it kills the official story.

A forward-opening hinge door separates the cockpit from the passenger compartment. It has three electric locking strikes, controlled by the flight crew. In normal conditions, when the door is closed, they remain locked. When there is a request to enter the cockpit, the flight crew can authorize entry by unlocking the door, that remains closed until it is pushed open.

When the flight crew does not respond to requests for entry, the door can also be unlocked by the cabin crew, by entering a two to seven-digit code (programmed by the airline) on the keypad, installed on the lateral side of the Forward Attendant Panel (FAP).

DEAR REMI, PLEASE ASSIST! WE NEED SOME MORE "TRUTH TELLING", PLEASE, WERE BOTH PILOTS SUICIDAL ALONG WITH EVERY STEWARDESS?

Read the final Germanwings report HERE

Who would lose world war 3? America, First Second and Third.

Preposterous? Think again. If there is one huge Freemason conspiracy in America that has gone unnoticed, it is the building codes mandating homes be built out of wood rather than other materials. There is no all encompassing Federal law or even a State law that mandates this, but it has indeed been accomplished by complete infiltration of city boards and enforcement at the local level. Concrete is far cheaper to build, lasts longer, and is far more secure. Why would Americans even think about putting a wooden home in tornado alley? Ask your local freemason lodge.

The near universal standard of fire, tornado, and NUCLEAR WEAPONS vulnerable wood homes in America is exactly why America would lose a nuclear war, and even a conventional war with Russia. And not by a little, America would easily be toasted 1000:1.

You cannot take what America does to an Arab country and compare that to what would happen in America. In Arab countries, homes are built out of concrete and brick, the way they should be, and therefore it takes bombs to destroy them. But if Russia even got one helicopter into an American city, and that helicopter had tracer bullets loaded in the guns, all it would take is one bullet per home and any home hit by a tracer round would burn to the ground. Any home not lit up by a tracer would become part of the firestorm anyway. One helicopter pass could annihilate a city of 50,000 in America.

And it would not even take that much in many cases

I know for certain that Boston has entire apartment complexes side by side for miles on end that are made out of wood. If even 20 of those got lit up by fire, there would be a chain reaction the fire departments could not stop and entire sections of the city would burn. In a war time setting, what would it take to accomplish that?

But wait, it is MUCH WORSE than this . . . .

America has little to no protection provided by the government in the form of fallout shelters. And wood homes provide virtually no protection from gamma radiation, so even the homes that did survive a conflict would be of dubious value. On the other hand, in addition to having construction that is far more resistant to damage from fire, and far more protective from radiation, Russia has enough actual fallout shelters to save approximately 70 percent of the population now, and those who make it to the fallout shelters late and are rejected will do far better than Americans will anyway because of the way things are built overall.

Bottom line?

America is banking an awful lot on "technical superiority" while having absolutely nothing to back it up in the way of national infrastructure. In a war time setting an American home is no better than a tent, and if the bombs start falling there will be absolutely no where to run to because the government did not care.

Here is a little scenario for you:

A 1 megaton nuclear bomb is detonated over an Arab city. In the first second, all the paint is burned off all surfaces facing the bomb. And the burning instantly stops after that because it's all concrete. Then the shock wave from the bomb hits the first homes that are in the crater zone and blows them away. A mile out from that, you start to see surviving walls. By the time you get three miles away from ground zero, practically all structures have survived to various degrees. Beyond that, you are out of the blast zone and there is only the 200 mph nuclear wind to worry about, which the concrete construction will shrug off with ease. Five miles out? Absolutely everyone survives the initial blast, and has only radiation to worry about. Total kill zone? right around 40 square miles.

A 1 megaton nuclear bomb is detonated over an American city. In the first second all the paint is burned off all surfaces facing the bomb, and after that everything keeps burning. A 200 mph nuclear wind extends outward for 30 miles in all directions, which wood homes will provide virtually no protection against. Within that radius only freak survival stories are to be had, with general devastation being the rule. Total devastation zone? approximately 3,000 square miles.

And because Americans have no experience with concrete, let me explain the difference: Though it can happen, an F5 tornado is not likely to destroy a well built solid concrete structure. It can happen but is not likely. The 200 mph "nuclear wind" from a nuclear bomb is only equal to an F3. According to the Federal government, there is no wood structure that can survive a direct hit from winds over 135 mph. Even a direct hit from an F1 will destroy almost any American home. The homes in the Arab world really would survive a nuclear attack, they really are that much better and American homes? A joke. A Mexican Chicken coop.

Offended? It really is that way, Mexicans use wood for animal shelters, they have not been brain whipped by so much mind numbing flag waving that they would ever think a wood home could actually be worth anything. They don't use wood to build something people will actually live in.

To those out there who are saying America would kick Russia's butt, keep in mind that there is a lot more to a war than what you have to blow the other guy up with. When it comes to having an ability to survive an attack, America does not even rate, consider your wooden home to offer a protection value of ZERO. And I believe it was made this way by intent, starting with the Federal Reserve takeover in 1911. This is approximately when they also launched Russia, and as part of their planning for a future American defeat by Russia, wood homes were mandated as the norm to prevent Americans from having anything they could actually mount a resistance from.