ALISON DID NOT WORK AT STATION FOR MORE THAN
TWO WEEKS BEFORE THE PSY OP
(Scroll Down)
Crisis actors!
(Scroll Down)
I am now going to dig in and state with clarity blanks were used
Jim Stone
James wrote:
I watched the alison parker video ... take it from someone (me) who
knows about guns ... the shooter had used the gun before with real
bullets ... watch as the gun learches FORWARD with each round ... these
are blanks ... the shooter is bracing for the inevitable backwards
impulse as the gun would release a real bullet ... BUT there is no real
bullet so the gun lurches forward with each round because the shooter is
reacting to what his instinct would say would be a real round ... but
since there is no real round the gun thrusts forward ... watch the video
again ... jim
My response: Ok, now I will say this: There is too much smoke and too much fire at the end of the barrel, which proves blanks.
To the left here is the frame that proves this is blanks being fired,
there is simply TOO MUCH FIRE at the end of the barrel and the color of
the flame is totally wrong for real bullets, that is the color of flame
from blanks, which is similar to the flame from black powder:
No camera shake also proves blanks.
DURING
DAYLIGHT, IT IS USUALLY DIFFICULT TO SEE MUZZLE FLASH FROM REAL BULLETS
USING MODERN SMOKELESS POWDER, AND THAT IS ALL THERE IS NOWADAYS.
However, muzzle flash from blanks shows up clearly, and this is what we
see here to the left. OOOH, SCARY LOOKING, but IT PROVES BLANKS, as
does the excessive smoke which I have NEVER seen from any real round I
have fired and I have shot thousands and thousands and thousands of
rounds and I mean freaking THOUSANDS with hand guns, shot guns, rifles,
you name it I have owned it, I have never seen smoke with modern (and I
am talking past 50 years) bullets and always see it with blanks which I
have also shot. WHAT SMOKES? OLD SCHOOL BLACK POWDER.
This is the
difference between blanks, which have to use black powder or something
similar because it will
explode with no back pressure provided by a
bullet. Modern smokeless powder will not go off properly or at all
without a bullet providing back pressure to cause it to explode. Black
powder will explode without any back pressure, but modern smokeless
powder will not. That is why smoky black powder is used in blanks And
the gun lurching forward is from vacuum pressure from the gases leaving
the barrel and making a forward pulling pressure which a bullet would
normally cancel out with a kick. Blanks get weapons dirty quick. It is
not the same quality material with blanks. Blanks smoke a lot.
A little correction to the above, when I said "you name it, I have owned
it" I mean rifles/shotgun/handgun semi/auto bolt, pump, etc. not every
gun made. Never had a single shot, everything I ever bought was
intended for more than casual use. Assortment of scopes . . . . believe
it or not, I did not like Leupold, my favorite was a cheap Bushnell.
It ended up being real bright, real clear, and very accurate. Never had
a tritium scope or laser scope (gimmicks). From what I have seen, what
makes a good scope is a great stable mount and a huge front objective.
HUGE SHOOTING STORY GLITCH #955: ALISON DID NOT WORK AT STATION FOR MORE THAN TWO WEEKS BEFORE THE PSY OP
Go back over the tweets our "shooter" tweeted after the shooting: Alison was hired to replace him, and he was only fired a short time ago! He tweets about being all mad at them for hiring Alison after she made racist comments. How would he know she made those comments if he was not around to see them? AND IF she did not work there, how did her illustrious boyfriend meet her 9 months ago and how did she become the light of channel 7, as he states, in the short time our shooter inadvertantly confirmed she was at the station? Folks, this is a sucking chest wound of a hole in the official story!
ROLL THE FOLLOWING TWEETS UP IN A BIG FAT ONE AND SMOKE'EM, NO WONDER WHY HIS TWITTER GOT DELETED, HIS TWEETS SCREW THE OFFICIAL LOVE AFFAIR WHOLESALE!
Clarification: His twitter, before it got deleted, confirmed he hired on at the station less than two months ago. Everything he is tweeting about is, when put in context, immediately recent. The newness of the twitter account could mean that it was set up just for this event!
Crisis actors!
I thought the reporter thought it was all real. However, if you compare
the audio between the shooter's video and the cameraman's video, the
woman being interviewed says different words right before the shooting
(meaning multiple takes) and Whoa, what do we have here? CRISIS
ACTORS!!!!!
This makes my blood boil, she really looked scared and shocked
on camera, and was only a bold faced liar. LESSON: Watch that shooting
video OVER AND OVER AND OVER again, so you know just how perfectly an
unscrupulous A-hole can act like something is real to accomplish a
political objective. Yep, this girl is DEFINITELY chillin out with
Jessica Ghawi/Redfield now!
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario