#MurderTruck #BulletStickers #WreckingBar All Bullshit!

Jim Stone

I WAITED TO SAY THIS UNTIL IT COULD BE ABSOLUTELY PROVEN: NO BULLETS WERE EVER FIRED AT THE TRUCK.

Have any doubt they used bullet stickers? The image I used to prove it came from HERE All people need to do to bust this psy op is think about what was put right in front of everyone.

UPDATE: DO NOT MISS THE NEW BULLET STICKER SET GRAPHIC. IT IS PLACED BELOW THE PICTURES OF THE TRUCK. THEY USED SET NUMBER 3 ON THE WINDOWS.

TAKE A LOOK AT THIS AND EXPLAIN IT! IN THE SECOND PICTURE, THE CAMERA ANGLE CAUGHT THE GLARE OFF THE SURFACE OF ONE OF THE BULLET STICKERS, AND THE GLARE WENT RIGHT ACROSS THE "BULLET HOLE!"

HERE ARE THE BULLET STICKER SETS. I FOUND THE ACTUAL SET. THEY USED THE "HOLLYWOOD" BULLET STICKERS THAT ARE IN THE BOTTOM SET FOR THE WINDOWS ON THE TRUCK.

Bandog surprised me with his message, where he still believed the bullet holes were real. But when you compare the windshield holes in THIS PICTURE and match them up with hollywood bullet set #3, MY GOSH WE HAVE A MATCH!

UPDATE: THE NEXT DAY THEY SMASHED THE WINDSHIELD, BECAUSE PEOPLE POINTED OUT THE LACK OF CRACKS. DO NOT BE FOOLED BY THIS, THE TRUCK PHOTOS ABOVE SHOW HOW IT REALLY WAS, WITH PERFECT CLARITY.

MORAL OF THE STORY: WHEN USING WINDOW STICKERS FOR A PSY OP, BE CAREFUL OF CAMERA ANGLES AND NEVER TAKE A PICTURE WHEN THERE IS GLARE ACROSS ONE OF THE STICKERS.

July 15 2016

UPDATE: The truck driver rampage in France story has multiple gaping holes which I will briefly mention here: 1. No second party cell phone coverage despite 40,000 people present. Also nothing from people on balconies who were far enough away from the action to cover it with real cameras. 2. No first responders, relatives or anyone else with the dead bodies more than a half hour after the carnage started, with the truck sitting there with windows shot. NO FIRST RESPONDERS FOR OVER A HALF HOUR? NO POLICE MOB? EVEN LONG AFTER EVERYTHING WAS COMPLETELY SECURED? Just photo op bodies laying there. YEP. STAR WARS HAPPENED. It looked so real. I never saw an ambulance in Star Wars either.

-SORRY- breaking the window on the next day to support the hoax won't cut it, when the cracks are not consistent with the "bullet holes"!

Compare the bullet holes in the windshield to the "hollywood" set above. Note: Though the windshield is now cracked, the cracks are not consistent with the bullet holes and instead match up with an apparent sledge hammer hit to the bottom left corner.

IMPORTANT: Look at the hole that I pointed out in the top picture. In this picture below, the camera photographed the bullet sticker properly, so the "hole" is wide open. Some people have pointed out that the orange decal on the upper right hand side of the windshield has a black center in the hole that would not be there if a bullet sticker with a transparent center was used. It has to be a magic marker trick or the correct bullet sticker, because the real damning evidence is what was missed and out of control of the psy op team - the center of the bullet hole that is reflecting in one photo, proving there is no hole, and the other photographs of the same sticker that did not catch glare because of the camera angle, and show it as "wide open". The fact it shows wide open in one shot and has obvious glare in another shot cinches this, stickers were used no if's or buts.

 

In some of the much much later videos and photos they show ambulances, but if it was a truck attack happening over a mile, then even a quarter mile away, where the people were hit, there should have been mobs of ambulances while this was going on. Yet there was not even one. How would bystanders or ambulances even know it was a terror attack? They would not have stayed away, they would have responded like normal. First responders should have been at the beginning of the scene in minutes, not over an hour later, especially since this supposedly happened at a major event, where first responders are staged and ready to go, EVERYWHERE. So they got blankets to cover the bodies, but no paramedics? HOAX!

My original post follows. It is different from what other people said, so I am leaving it as is to provide perspective in addition to discoveries others have made.

Truck driver rampage story has a glaring hole

Here it is: Supposedly this guy went on a 40 MPH rampage for 30 minutes. But he only went 1 mile. Common core failure. COMMON CORE BREACH! 40 mph for 30 minutes equals 20 miles. To cover only one mile, he could have only been going two miles an hour.

So we have a glaring problem with this story already.

If this story actually happened, something else makes a lot more sense: The truck was taken over via remote control, the people remote controlling the truck caused a malfunction in a little less than a minute and a half, and the driver sat inside the disabled truck in shock for 28 minutes and 40 seconds until the police arrived and shot him. Gun thrown in to add spice, he probably did not have one or he would have shot bystanders. "Allahu Akbar" line added for spice (yes, he "shouted that" the moment before the final bullet hit him, even though he'd already been shot at for a while.) How would he know RIGHT WHEN THE RIGHT BULLET WAS COMING SO IT WAS TIME TO SAY THAT?

Lots 'O bullshit here already, if they want REAL NEWS to be believable, they can't spike it with this B.S. if it is real to begin with!

Ok, let's line item this:

1. He went 40 mph.
2. He went one mile.
3. It took him a half hour to do it.
4. He had a gun, and already "demonstrated" with the truck that he wanted to kill people. But he shot no one.
5. He conveniently shouted Allahu Akbar.

Yep, that all makes sense to me. How about a little more sense than that even?

REAL PROBABLE SCENARIO 1:

1. His truck was taken over via remote, as all vehicles sold in the U.S. are required to have after a little known law passed in 2005 mandating that some form of cell network linked control had to be in all new vehicles from 2005 onward. This probably became law in Europe also.

2. They sped it to 40 mph, went through the barricades and started mowing people down with it.

3. After a mile or so and in less than 2 minutes, they caused a malfunction in the truck and it stopped, probably by ripping an air line loose (which would lock up the brakes)

4. Mo sat there in shock, with the doors locked because they locked them via remote, for (according to the requirements of not-so-common-core math,) 28 minutes and 40 seconds (until police arrived). That is how you can explain why he did not get out and run during all that time, and why he shot no one despite "having a gun" which would have allowed him to get out and run.

5. Finally armed police arrived and shot him through the glass, and they made up an excuse that he had a gun.

6. "Allahu Akbar" was added to the story for spice.

Probable scenario 2:

It was a drill and they killed the patsy.

One way or another, real or not, they have spiced this story with enough B.S. to wreck it's credibility entirely. Who knows - maybe the guy did flip out and start mowing people down, but if the story is sewn with obvious patent bullshit, it's a fat chance I am going to believe any of it.

AS USUAL, PATSY DEAD. This time (obviously) because if they did remote control his truck, they could not have him in court saying that. The same tired story we have seen far too much: dead men tell no tales

I know about the "Baton Rouge shootings" but am staying on the following topic for another day, because it irrevocably proves the truck attack in Nice was 100 percent phony, (and therefore most likely the Baton Rouge shootings are phony.) If we are going to get anywhere on the "terror" topic, people have to see this, have it sink in, and distribute it far and wide. WE NEVER GET ANYTHING AS OBVIOUS AS THIS TO KILL LIES WITH, THEY TOTALLY BLEW IT, ARCHIVE, POST, AND CONVERT THE BLIND OVER TO THE TRUTH.

July 16 2016

WRECKING BAR!!!!!!

NOW MORE THAN BULLET STICKERS, THEY USED A FLAT ENDED WRECKING BAR TO POKE "BULLET HOLES" IN THE METAL! ANOTHER BUST!

You can't get a clear picture of the bullet holes in the metal on the truck. I FOUND OUT WHY. It is because they were obviously poked into the metal with a wrecking bar!

 

ALL OF THESE "BULLET HOLES" IN THE METAL ARE NOW PROVEN TO BE STRAIGHT ON POINT BLANK SHOTS WITH THE SHOOT OUT VIDEO, NOT A SINGLE ONE WAS FIRED FROM THE FRONT OF THE TRUCK. THERE SHOULD NOT BE ANY ELONGATED BULLET HOLES. YET, NOT ONLY ARE THEY ELONGATED, THEY ARE ALL RECTANGULAR WITH SQUARE CORNERS. SO EITHER THE POLICE SHOOT RECTANGULAR BULLETS NOW, OR A WRECKING BAR WAS USED, THAT IS THE ONLY WAY THIS HAPPENED, AND IT EXPLAINS PERFECTLY WHY YOU CAN'T FIND ANY CRYSTAL CLEAR BULLET PICTURES OF THE SIDE OF THIS TRUCK ANYWHERE. IT ALSO EXPLAINS WHY THERE ARE NO EXIT HOLES. 

Despite the censorship, someone managed to get a picture of the holes that was good enough even if it was not "crystal clear".

Obvious problems with the Nice terror attack:

1. None of the video shows the truck actually hit anyone.

2. They lied about the truck going through barricades and into a "people only" area. The truck only goes down a street with existing traffic, where if people are watching out like they should, they would not get hit. And it was not going fast at all, like it would be on a death mission. The death toll could not have been this high. If he was lucky, he would have hit only one or two people even if he went full speed through red light crosswalks which were never mentioned in the MSM.

3. There is no police shoot out video, despite what claims are. Police simply approach the side of the truck that has no "bullet holes" and go around it. There is no scene at all of them shooting the glass, or putting a single bullet hole in the truck. There is only sound, which could be dubbed in and no glass fragments flying, no holes appearing, NOTHING. All "holes" appear at angles the camera never gets live, despite the fact that the camera followed the police in! This would be done if you used bullet stickers, and had pre existing holes in the cab, on the OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE TRUCK already in place for the still cameras later that the video camera could not ever see because if they were there before the police arrived, it would prove it all fake. We are just supposed to believe this camera guy stayed in the line of fire as the police shot towards him, from the side of the cab you can't see, after they went around it ON THE SAME VIDEO. 

When I first heard of this story, I made a few assumptions that were wrong. I assumed the truck swerved and hit people. That was wrong, despite the fact they said it. I assumed the truck went into an area that was blocked off for pedestrians only, down a path way that only people were supposed to be on. I BELIEVED THAT WAS THE STORY, BECAUSE THEY SAID SO. THAT WAS WRONG, IT WAS JUST ON A NORMAL STREET THAT WAS NOT BLOCKED OFF AT ALL.

The entire pretext for this story is so fake it could not possibly happen. It would not be possible to go down any street that is allowing normal traffic, and hit more than a couple people even if you tried. People are not stupid, they have brains and eyballs and ears, and are a moving target. The truck is loud. You can't sneak up on anyone at 40 mph and just bash them. It is not fast enough for surprise, or slow enough for the truck to be quiet. This truck did not go on a rampage through a deaf club. And the videos show that even if the truck was speeding, it was going close to the normal speed limit for the street on top of that! If the truck was not jumping the curbs and bashing barricades, the entire story is BULLSHIT.