Attacks on Sound of Freedom Increase

 

Already a box-office smash just 6 days after its release, Sound of Freedom -- an action thriller featuring "vigilantes" fighting child-sex trafficking -- is quickly demonstrating that Satan's minions do not like sunshine. Of course, film critics as well as just casual movie goers are at liberty to critique elements such as script, character development, flow, acting, music etc. But the haters and subtle cheap-shot artists -- on both the Marxist Left as well as the Black Pilled "far right" -- who are now trashing SoF and its star, Jim Caviezel, for being connected to "Q Anon" -- are doing the rest of us a valuable service. Individuals "throwing shade" at this film -- for anything other than legitimate reasons related to the cinematic -- have outed themselves as either pro-child-rape, or so pathologically pessimistic that they should be permanently shunned by the Truther community as nit-witted, nay-saying, negative nutters of no further use to us.

As for the resident film reviewer at RealHistoryChan.com (me) -- without prejudicing your own assessment with detailed personal observations, here is my honest and objective rating of SoF on a scale of 1 to 10:

* As a suspense / action film: 8 (it was 'OK,' could have been better)
* The historical importance and absolute necessity of its message: 10!
* Its ability to upset sleeping normies: 10!
* Its potential to inspire normies to action: ? (That remains to be seen. It all depends on how far gone society has become.)

All things considered -- not bad, boys and girls. Not bad at all -- and certainly, no downside.




1. Trump himself is now promoting Sound of Freedom. // 2. We expected that certain members of the LGBT crowd would go online to trash the film as "Q Anon." // 3. But now, some dubious Black Pill dealers "on the right" are making common cause with the Pedosexuals.


ATTACKS FROM THE LEFT

Most of the Deep State outlets which have opted for direct frontal assault -- instead of the New York Slimes' "silent treatment" -- are breathlessly linking SoF and Caviezel to the Q Anon movement, and questioning the film's claim of being based upon a true story. It is not even necessary to defend Caviezel or Q because SoF is neither about Caviezel nor Q. The message of SoF remains clear and indisputable -- specifically this: Child-sex trafficking is a lucrative and growing international trade. The guttural bile vomited at Q and "Jesus" is thus purely diversionary.

Other mouthpieces of Fake News are battling the SoF phenomenon in a more subtle and sneaky manner. You'll find numerous references now to SoF as being a "faith based" movie. Though the film stars "Jesus" from Passion of the Christ, and there are a few references to the Almighty here and there ("God's children are not for sale") -- in no way can this film be described as having any significant religious tones (heaven forbid!). The subtle propaganda jab of the "faith based" adjective is obviously intended to keep disinterested non-religious and the anti-religious viewers away from the theater -- after the initial news-making wave of us "conspiracy theorists" has passed. This is critical for the Satanic elite because, when it comes to the kidnapping and raping of children, even the most "morally relative" agnostic or atheist would be horrified.

Below are some examples of these disgusting and devious discrediting tactics.



The Guardian (UK)

Jezebel

Rolling Stone Magazine

Washington Post

Yahoo

Showbiz411

ATTACKS FROM THE BLACK-PILLED RIGHT

Putting aside the vexing questions about who is a deviously deliberate Black Pill dealer versus who is simply a pathologically pessimistic Black Pill addict, it is deeply frustrating to hear the first few voices within our ranks already dumping on Sound of Freedom. Again, these detractors detract not because of artistic merit -- but rather, over the ABSURD notion that the film is a Deep State "limited hangout" operation intended to water down the extent of the problem and protect the higher-ups from scrutiny. If that were the case, then why even touch the subject, at all, when it is still barely known to normies?

That is the type of demoralizing dung that Michael Hoffman -- whom RHC has crossed swords with once before -- is peddling to his fanboys. Hoffman's Twitter diatribe against both Q and SoF is truly horrifying -- so bad, in fact, that a moderately suspicious mind has got to wonder if this seemingly erudite character is perhaps "projecting" when he cynically insinuates that SoF is part of a government conspiracy to mislead us. The pretext for his attacks, which include Caviezel, are spelled out in a long litany of what the film did not present about the involvement of "elites" in child sex trafficking -- as if newbies and normies are intellectually and psychologically prepared to digest the whole story at once -- delivered in just 2 & 1/2 hours! Hoffman is evidently unaware (or pretends to be) of the fact that Caviezel has indeed, in several interviews, stated that the CIA is deeply involved in this nasty business. (here ya go, Hoffman)

RHC replied to Hoffman's nonsensical Black Pill toxin as follows:

"I'm willing to bet that Hoffman never even read, let alone analyzed, any of the 5000 Q Posts. His trashing of this film is astonishing & reveals his ignorance. The film is a door-opener for newbies, but MH wanted the makers to "go all the way" and thus not even get into theaters!

If Hoffman were a school principal, he'd condemn the first-grade math teacher for only teaching the number line, and not mentioning quadratic equations. What a dope!"
*

Hoffman (who hates Hitler, by the way) also ridicules stories of adrenochrome blood-harvesting as psyop tales planted by the Deep State in order to discredit us.

Some lesser known "far right" ass-clowns -- whose names I'd rather not even give free publicity to -- almost make Half-Ass Hoffman seem reasonable by comparison. They are actually claiming now that SoF is part of a Trump / "Hollywood" plot (it's not even a Hollywood film!) to frighten American parents into having their children micro-chipped for the New World Order! (palm to face, shaking my head, sighing) If that were the case, then why feature children from remote regions of Latin America? Would it not have made more sense to show American kids being snatched out of their safe suburban cul de sacs? Dopes!

If, in the coming days and weeks, SoF breaks out of our Truther Echo Chamber and starts to really take off within the population at large -- expect more dishonest attacks aimed at beating down the film's audience numbers. Do not forget the names of these dubious detractors.



1. Hoffman properly debunks the Holohoax (sheep-dipping himself?) ... // 2. But then dumps irrational filth on Hitler at every turn. I had to straighten his ass out back in 2020. // 3. Hoffman's vicious and illogical attacks "from the right" upon SoF, Caviezel and Q / Q Anon align him with the adversarial position of Fake News --- and now arouse suspicion.

MIKE'S BANNED BOOKs & PDFs

Tip the Writer