Jim Stone
The Speaker of the US House of Representatives has sharply condemned Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump for predicting riots if he is denied the party's nomination for president.
"Nobody should say such things in my opinion because to even address or hint at violence is unacceptable," said Paul Ryan, a Republican who represents Wisconsin's 1st congressional district.
MY COMMENT: "to even address or hint at violence is unacceptable" ??!!?? Oh, you mean like when you used the military to commit mass violence against now proven innocents in Iraq? Or how about setting up the death of god knows how many Syrians? What about Libya? Seems to me like violence is great as long as you are not the one receiving it.
Try to tell me, dear Paul, how Syria, Iraq, or Libya ever threatened you, yet you applauded as they were murdered in cold blood. You and your cronies are the masters of violence, and only stand against it when you are a little worried it might be directed at you.
I remember a laundromat owned by the descendants of refugees from Ukraine, where Paul's ilk murdered more than 30 million in cold blood. They posted in all the windows the full reality of what happened there, and I patiently read it all. The Jews started out with a campaign against violence, and made every ukranian believe that violence was wrong, so they did nothing as their fields were burned, and they were set up for destruction. The Jews moved into the finer homes, ousting the rightful occupants by force. They sat there and supervised the death of the Ukranian people with countless armed guards outside the best homes, to protect them just in case there was any "violence", and sat there and watched as millions died around them from starvation, a totally non violent death.
The Jews enforced a non violent end to millions, with a threat of violence if anyone did anything to stop them. If they did not know violence was an effective balance against tyranny, they would have
never had guarded homes. When it comes to violence, the Jew is the master of its efficient use.
If people actually believe violence is always wrong, they will get eaten by the wolves in a totally non violent way. They will be destroyed by a non violent GMO, tainted vaccine, drug, or whatever other "non violent" perversion the masters of violence dream up, and when the masters of violence decide the time is right, they use it un checked, as Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya prove absolutely. They have it nailed from all sides, and are quickly proving that having their own violence returned to them is the only answer.
Violence is acceptable when elections get stolen. In that case, violence is the ONLY ANSWER.
Violence is acceptable when the bonds of slavery must be broken. In that case, violence is the ONLY ANSWER.
Violence is acceptable when a system is in place that enforces tyranny on the people, and only violence will overthrow that tyranny, - case in point - when the peaceful process is rendered irrelevant by a rigged vote.
I am sick of scamming kikes saying violence is always wrong, when they use it in abundance both passively and aggressively on a nearly constant basis, and when direct violence is the reality they themselves created as the only solution to the current problem they caused.
ONCE AGAIN TRUMP IS RIGHT WHEN HE AT LEAST INDIRECTLY STATED THE PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO VIOLENCE, WHAT ELSE COULD POSSIBLY BE THE ANSWER THIS TIME?
And I pray to God that if there is violence, it gets directed at the proper recipient, and not Bob's hardware store.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario