Jon Rappoport
Ferocious vaccine manufacturers are constantly on the move, looking
for new “demographics” to shoot with vaccines. If they could stick a
needle into a rock and get paid for it, they would find a reason to do
it.
But in this case, we’re talking about pregnant women.
Protection, protection, protection—that’s the cover the government keeps pushing.
Meanwhile, the vaccines they’re foisting on pregnant women have a track record of damage.
Barbara Loe Fisher, head of the National Vaccine Information Center, has the story, so I’ll let her tell it. These are excerpts from her testimony before the Nov. 13, 2015 “meeting
of the FDA Vaccines & Related Biological Products Advisory
Committee (VRBPAC) on proposed changes to FDA requirements for licensure
of vaccines intended for use during pregnancy”:
Fisher (“FDA Prepares to Fast Track New Vaccines Targeting Pregnant Women,” 11/17/2016):
“In 2006, CDC officials directed doctors to give all pregnant women a
flu shot and, in 2011, a Tdap shot during every pregnancy, no matter
how little time has elapsed between pregnancies. Prior to FDA
licensure, influenza, diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccines [Tdap
and flu shots] were not
tested in or proven safe and effective for
pregnant women in large clinical trials when given during every
pregnancy either singly or simultaneously.”
“Categorized by FDA as Pregnancy Category B and C biologicals because
it is not known whether the vaccines are genotoxic and can cause fetal
harm or can affect maternal fertility and reproduction, administering
influenza and Tdap vaccines to pregnant women is an off-label use of
these vaccines. It is a policy that assumes maternal vaccination is
necessary, safe and effective without proving it.”
“…pertussis containing vaccine [Tdap] injuries and deaths are the
most compensated claim in the federal vaccine injury compensation
program (VICP) for infants and children, while influenza vaccine-related
injuries and deaths are the most compensated claim for adults. And
yet, in the absence of credible biological mechanism and epidemiologic
evidence pre-licensure proving these vaccines are safe for all pregnant
women, their fetuses and newborns, female health care workers are being
fired for refusing to be injected with them while they are pregnant.”
“The National Vaccine Information Center is opposed to FDA
retroactively licensing influenza and Tdap vaccines for use in pregnant
women and fast tracking RSV [respiratory syncytial virus] and group
strep B vaccines to licensure…”
No evidence of safety, but so what? Reports of injuries and deaths, but so what?
Pregnant women are a “lucrative market,” and that’s all that counts.
Need a terrific target for further disabling the population? Pregnant women are ideal.
The FDA and its army of allies will assure you that these untested
and off-label uses for vaccines are perfectly safe, because all vaccines
are safe.
The FDA speaks for the pharmaceutical industry. Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.
It might be tempting to say the FDA is careless, is overlooking important factors—but it’s much, much worse than that.
Here are excerpts from a 2012 piece of mine about an FDA drug
reviewer, and what happened to him when he went against the grain, and
opposed his bosses on judgments about what was safe medicine and what
was dangerous medicine:
—In a stunning interview with Truthout’s Martha Rosenberg, former FDA
drug reviewer, Ronald Kavanagh, exposes the FDA as a relentless
criminal mafia protecting its client, Big Pharma, with a host of mob
strategies (“Former FDA Reviewer Speaks Out About Intimidation, Retaliation and Marginalizing of Safety,” 7/29/2012).
Kavanagh: “…widespread [FDA] racketeering, including witness tampering and witness retaliation.”
“I was threatened with prison.”
“One [FDA] manager threatened my children…I was afraid that I could
be killed for talking to Congress and criminal investigators.”
Kavanagh reviewed new drug applications made to the FDA by
pharmaceutical companies. He was one of the holdouts at the Agency who
insisted that the drugs had to be safe and effective before being
released to the public.
But honest appraisal wasn’t part of the FDA culture, and Kavanagh
swam against the tide, until he realized his life and the lives of his
children were on the line.
What was his secret task at the FDA? “Drug reviewers were clearly
told not to question drug companies and that our job was to approve
drugs.” In other words, rubber stamp them. Say the drugs were safe and
effective when they were not.
Kavanagh’s revelations are stunning. He recalls a meeting where a
drug-company representative flat-out stated that his company had paid
the FDA for a new-drug approval. Paid for it. As in bribe.
***Kavanagh remarks that the drug pyridostigmine, given to US troops
to prevent the later effects of nerve gas, “actually increased the
lethality” of certain nerve agents.
Kavanagh recalls being given records of safety data on a drug—and
then his bosses told him which sections not to read. Obviously, they
knew the drug was dangerous and they knew exactly where, in the reports,
that fact would be revealed.
—end of excerpt—
Women have to know what is waiting for them, in vials of vaccines,
when they become pregnant. Waiting for them and their unborn children.
Huxley’s Brave New World portrayed a nation of docile
citizens. But there, at least, the drug of choice was Soma, a compound
that stimulated pleasure centers.
Here, we’re talking about docility and obedience in the face of suffering, pain, neurological damage, and death.
Doctors don’t want to know about this. They don’t want to know the
true story about vaccines. If they did, they’d suddenly remember the
body count they’ve been responsible for.
So instead, they polish their act, designed to invoke credibility and, above all, authority.
Invent a mountaintop, stand on it, and sell, sell, sell.
That’s their vaccine motto.
What’s yours?
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario