How The #Spanish #American #War Changed The #World

Teddy Roosevelt's mythical horseback charge up San Juan Hill 

catapulted him to national prominence.

tomatobubble,com

High School history fables taught us that the Spanish-American War of 1898 was a meaningless war instigated by the Yellow Journalist William Randolph Hearst. Here's a typical history-book sample of the retarded drivel that is still being spoon-fed to captive audiences of dumbed down students:

"It is arguable that the Spanish-American War was perhaps the most pointless war in the history of the United States. Although it was not known at the time, the war was not truly fought for territory, for markets, for principle, or even for honor. Rather, it began because William Randolph Hearst, editor of the popular New York Journal sought sensational material to print."

Certainly, Hearst and his Jewish rival at the New York World, Joseph Pulitzer, helped to poison the public mind towards Spain. But this idiotic and incomplete analysis ignores the "big picture" of the Globalist hand which moves the chess pieces. The Spanish-American War was neither "pointless", nor insignificant. To the contrary, without the precedent-setting features, tactical acquisitions, and adverse side-effects of this unjust war, and the prolonged US-Philippines War which grew out of it, World War I, the Bolshevik Revolution, World War II and all the other horror stories of the past 100 + years would not have been possible.

Intrigued? Keep reading.

1- As outrageous and essential as their propaganda was, the belief that a newspaper circulation rivalry between Hearst and Pulitzer caused the war, as the first cartoon above suggests, is just as moronic.

2- The shocking claim of Spaniards strip-searching American women was false.

As the turn of the century approached, America was strong, independent, and what the Globalists would call "isolationist" - a stupid propaganda term used to mock the desire to maintain peaceful commerce and neutral relations with foreign countries. The very thought of picking a fight overseas was as foreign to the American psyche as homosexual "marriage" or government housing.

The Globo-Zionist crime gang was not nearly as entrenched among the American elite as it is today, but the pernicious influence of the New World Order was growing. Money Masters such as Jacob

How The #Spanish #American #War Changed The #World

Teddy Roosevelt's mythical horseback charge up San Juan Hill 

catapulted him to national prominence.

tomatobubble,com

High School history fables taught us that the Spanish-American War of 1898 was a meaningless war instigated by the Yellow Journalist William Randolph Hearst. Here's a typical history-book sample of the retarded drivel that is still being spoon-fed to captive audiences of dumbed down students:

"It is arguable that the Spanish-American War was perhaps the most pointless war in the history of the United States. Although it was not known at the time, the war was not truly fought for territory, for markets, for principle, or even for honor. Rather, it began because William Randolph Hearst, editor of the popular New York Journal sought sensational material to print."

Certainly, Hearst and his Jewish rival at the New York World, Joseph Pulitzer, helped to poison the public mind towards Spain. But this idiotic and incomplete analysis ignores the "big picture" of the Globalist hand which moves the chess pieces. The Spanish-American War was neither "pointless", nor insignificant. To the contrary, without the precedent-setting features, tactical acquisitions, and adverse side-effects of this unjust war, and the prolonged US-Philippines War which grew out of it, World War I, the Bolshevik Revolution, World War II and all the other horror stories of the past 100 + years would not have been possible.

Intrigued? Keep reading.

1- As outrageous and essential as their propaganda was, the belief that a newspaper circulation rivalry between Hearst and Pulitzer caused the war, as the first cartoon above suggests, is just as moronic.

2- The shocking claim of Spaniards strip-searching American women was false.

As the turn of the century approached, America was strong, independent, and what the Globalists would call "isolationist" - a stupid propaganda term used to mock the desire to maintain peaceful commerce and neutral relations with foreign countries. The very thought of picking a fight overseas was as foreign to the American psyche as homosexual "marriage" or government housing.

The Globo-Zionist crime gang was not nearly as entrenched among the American elite as it is today, but the pernicious influence of the New World Order was growing. Money Masters such as Jacob Schiff, John Rockefeller, JP Morgan and others were already on board with the Globalist movement; as were media moguls like Adolph Ochs(NY Times), and the aforementioned Hearst and Pulitzer. America's potential as a global 'hit-man' for the NWO was not lost upon these One Worlders, particularly in regard to establishing a menacing naval presence from which the emerging U.S. bully could influence the affairs of Asia. Thus was born the idea for the first "Asian pivot" - the theft of the Spanish colonies of Guam and the Philippines.

The "problem" of overcoming American "isolationism" posed a challenge for the Globalists. Americans wanted as much to do with the affairs of Asia as they did of Mars or Venus. Besides, Spain wasn't about to give away territories which it had benevolently ruled for more than three centuries. Concurrent with the desire to take Guam and the Philippines was a movement to annex Hawaii and make it an American territory. But in 1897, the annexation movement stalled due to the strong opposition of native Hawaiians and the inability of supporters to win a 2/3 majority in the U.S. Senate. What's a Globalist to do?

Dear Fellow American: Do You Remember Iraq? Syria? ANYTHING?

WashingtonsBlog

How Can Americans Fall for Pro-War Propaganda So Soon After Learning of the Deceptions In Selling the Iraq and Syria Wars?

Dear fellow American:

Do you remember that our government lied us into a war in Iraq?

Do you remember that that didn’t turn out very well?

Do you remember that the U.S. government came really close to lying us into a war in Syria?

Los intereses de los Rothschild ¿detrás del acoso a Irán?

RT – El deseo de controlar el sistema bancario de Irán podría ser una de las principales causas por las que Occidente e Israel han puesto a la república islámica en el punto de mira, según un artículo publicado por la web American Free Press.

La nación persa es uno de los tres países cuyos bancos centrales todavía no están bajo control de la familia Rothschild, señala el medio electrónico citando a unos investigadores. Los otros dos de esta lista son Cuba y Corea del Norte. Antes del 11-S la lista estaba integrada por nueve países. Además de los enumerados, figuraban Afganistán, Irak, Libia y Sudán.

No obstante, la intervención militar de EE.UU. en Irak y Afganistán ha permitido a los Rothschild extender su red hacia estas naciones. Lo mismo, pero más tarde, pasó con Sudán y Libia, según el sitio web.

Desde que los Rothschild llegaron a controlar el Banco de Inglaterra alrededor del año 1815, han estado apoderándose de los bancos de todo el mundo. Su método consistía, según el medio electrónico, en hacer que los políticos corruptos del país aceptasen un préstamo importante que nunca podrían pagar y de este modo dejarlos endeudados con el sistema bancario de la familia. Si este método no funcionaba, recurrían a otros instrumentos para conseguir sus objetivos, a una invasión, por ejemplo, que finalmente permitía establecer en la nación un banco que obedeciese las reglas establecidas por la todopoderosa familia.

De acuerdo con American Free Press, el clan de banqueros británicos controla el Banco de Inglaterra, la Reserva Federal, el Banco Central Europeo, el Fondo Monetario Internacional, el Banco Mundial y el Banco de Pagos Internacionales. Se estima que los Rothschild poseen más de la mitad de las riquezas del planeta: su fortuna se calcula en 231 billones de dólares, según la compañía de servicios financieros Credit Suisse.

Teniendo en cuenta este panorama, no sería sorprendente que detrás del acoso a Irán estuviera el insaciable apetito de los Rothschild.