All #Power to the #Banks! The #Winners-Take-All #Regime of #EmmanuelMacron

By Diana Johnstone

A ghost of the past was the real winner of the French presidential election. Emmanuel Macron won only because a majority felt they had to vote against the ghost of “fascism” allegedly embodied by his opponent, Marine Le Pen. Whether out of panic or out of the need to feel respectable, the French voted two to one in favor of a man whose program most of them either ignored or disliked. Now they are stuck with him for five years.

If people had voted on the issues, the majority would never have elected a man representing the trans-Atlantic elite totally committed to “globalization”, using whatever is left of the power of national governments to weaken them still further, turning over decision-making to “the markets” – that is, to international capital, managed by the major banks and financial institutions, notably those located in the United States, such as Goldman-Sachs.

The significance of this election is so widely misrepresented that clarification requires a fairly thorough explanation, not only of the Macron project, but also of what the (impossible) election of Marine Le Pen would have meant.

From a Two Party to a Single Party System
Despite the multiparty nature of French elections, for the past generation France has been essentially ruled by a two-party system, with government power alternating between the Socialist Party, roughly the equivalent of the U.S. Democratic Party, and a party inherited from the Gaullist tradition which has gone through various name changes before recently settling on calling itself Les Républicains (LR),in obvious imitation of the United States. For decades, there has been nothing “socialist” about the Socialist Party and nothing Gaullist about The Republicans. In reality, both have adopted

#Vaccine - #Vacuna

15-Miinute Video: 

Vaccinations as Good for you as Wars, Banksters, Corporate Media!

Wars cause peace, especially our wars, especially now. More wars cause even more peace, so obviously bigger wars are better for peace. The very best war, therefore, is global nuclear World War III.

Banks that create what we use for money as ever-increasing total debt must be “bailed-out” and “bailed-in” because debt causes prosperity. The more debt created by banks, the more prosperous we all are. Obviously, therefore, our best condition is to only have debt with all assets owned by bank oligarchs. Another benefit of serfdom is peacefulness; second only to war.

History shows empires use media propaganda to mask “Big Lie” crimes centered in war and money. But, here and now, the US is not an empire, and Americans receive truthful media. The evidence is self-obvious in light of constant reporting of peaceful wars, prosperous debt, and continuous sports/entertainment.

Because we rightfully trust US leaders with war, money, and honesty, we should absolutely trust vaccinations; especially that all children get all required ~70 shots (here, here).

Ken Anton reports on this resource page with videos:

Suicides of Bank Executives

Suicides of Bank Executives, Fraud, Financial Manipulation: 

JPMorgan Chase Advisor Tony Blair is Not Involved

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
 

JPMorgan Chase is the unspoken architect of fraud, corruption, not to mention the establishment of the largest Ponzi scheme in World history. The agenda is to steal and appropriate wealth through market manipulation:

“Just last month, JPMorgan Chase acknowledged that it facilitated the largest Ponzi scheme in history, looking the other way as Bernie Madoff brazenly turned his business bank account at JPMorgan Chase into an unprecedented money laundering operation that would have set off bells, whistles and sirens at any other bank.

The U.S. Justice Department allowed JPMorgan to pay $1.7 billion and sign a deferred prosecution agreement, meaning no one goes to jail at JPMorgan — again. The largest question that no one can or will answer is how the compliance, legal and anti-money laundering personnel at JPMorgan ignored for years hundreds of transfers and billions of dollars in round trip maneuvers between Madoff and the account of Norman Levy. Even one such maneuver should set off an investigation. (Levy is now deceased and the Trustee for Madoff’s victims has settled with his estate.)” Pam Martens, Russ Martens, JPMorgan Vice President’s Death Shines Light on Bank’s Close Ties to the CIA, WallStreetParade.com, February 12, 2014

Ireland vs the Banksters

Irish bankers face criminal charges; kleptocrats caught joking about own misdeeds

By Ronald L. Ray

The Icelandic way of dealing with financial fraud committed by bank executives is spreading to other countries of Europe, including now Ireland.

The Nordic island was the first country in decades to expel or imprison corrupt moneylenders oppressing the people, with incredibly positive results. A handful of other nations, notably Hungary, also have gone after the debt slavers. But add Ireland to the growing list of those which have found the courage to confront the problem of bankers conspiring to deprive honest citizens of their hard-earned wealth. After four years of investigations and public outrage, the Irish republic has charged six top financiers with crimes related to the collapse of Anglo Irish Bank (AIB) in 2008.

Although a number of financial institutions became insolvent and were nationalized in the collapse of 2008, AIB outdid them all. The bailouts for this company alone totaled €30 billion—around twice that in U.S. dollars at the time—and it still failed, saddling 4.5 million Irish citizens with the massive debt, about $13,000 per person. That was too much for the people, who demanded justice.

Finally, in July 2012, police arrested three former Anglo Irish executives and charged them with 16 offenses. They are accused of illegally lending the bank’s money to the “Maple 10,” a group of millionaire developers, states Irish Voice Reporter. The “10” were then to purchase stock in the bank to prop up the share price and convince depositors the bank remained sound.

This was brought on by then-CEO David Drumm making bad bets with his own stock in the organization. If he had then sold the shares, it would have led to an investor panic. Drumm fled to Massachusetts, possibly to avoid potential prosecution. The trial of the other three begins this month.

Even more sensationally, three additional high-ranking bankers were arrested in December 2013 and charged with crimes, including fraud, related to deceiving investors and the Irish government about the financial status of AIB. Conversations by John Bowe, Denis Casey and Peter Fitzpatrick were recorded by the bank’s security system—incredibly, with the men’s knowledge. They can be heard to joke and laugh about deliberately misleading the Irish government in 2008 and choosing a too-low figure of €7 billion for a requested bailout, in order to lure the government into committing larger sums later.

“[Y]ou get them to write a big check, and they have to keep—they have to support their money,” said John Bowe, former head of capital markets for AIB. The €7 billion was presented as a temporary bridge, “until we can pay you back. Which is never.”

According to the Irish Independent, Bowe’s lawyer had the chutzpah to claim, “[It] was not a case of self-enrichment and the prosecution was in the context of the banking system.” These three men appear next in court on March 12.

RT.com reports that a spokesman for the Sinn Fein party told Financial Times, “that the people must be prosecuted for their roles in collapsing the Irish economy,” in which the failure of AIB was a major factor.