#Complex #Integration: The #Fatal #Flaw Of #Evolution

By Mike King

The great and the good of the “intelligentsia” assure us that all “educated” people accept Charles Darwin’s Evolution as a indisputable fact of science that is "not open for debate." Now those superstitious "straw-men" bible-thumpers portrayed in the propaganda film Inherit the Wind may have a hard time accepting it; but even the slightest doubt can never be tolerated within the elite confines of the academic cool-kids club. Woodrow Wilson Warmonger of World War I fame, a former pointy-headed Princeton professor himself, put it this way:

“Of course, like every other man of intelligence and education I do believe in organic evolution. It surprises me that at this late date such questions should be raised.”

And yet, neither Darwin, nor Wilson, nor the Communist ACLU Attorney Clarence Darrow (played by Spencer Tracy), nor any other “scientist” (bow your head in solemn reverence when you say that word) has ever adequately addressed the gaping holes of Darwin’s Dogma. The best rebuttal the "smart people" can muster consists of scorn, ridicule, charges of "stupidity" and even government force -- but never any true scientific or philosophical substance. Many of these holes are blown wide-open in the book: “God vs Darwin: The Logical Supremacy of Intelligent Design Creationism” (by yours truly). But for this particular piece, let us focus on what is perhaps the single biggest flaw of all

#ComplexIntegration: The #Fatal #Flaw of #Evolution

tomatobubble, com

The great and the good of the “intelligentsia” assure us that all “educated” people accept Darwin’s Evolution as a indisputable fact of science that is "not open for debate." Oh those superstitious "straw-men" bible-thumpers portrayed in the propaganda film Inherit the Wind may have a hard time accepting it, but even the slightest doubt can never be tolerated within the elite confines of the academic cool-kids club. Woodrow Wilson Warmonger of World War I fame, a former Princeton professor himself, put it this way:

“Of course, like every other man of intelligence and education I do believe in organic evolution. It surprises me that at this late date such questions should be raised.”

And yet, neither Darwin, nor Wilson, nor Spencer Tracy, nor any other “scientist” has ever adequately addressed the gaping holes of Darwin’s Dogma. The best rebuttal the "smart people" can muster consists of scorn, ridicule, charges of "stupidity" and even government force -- but never any real scientific substance. Many of these holes are blown wide-open in the book: “God vs Darwin: The Logical Supremacy of Intelligent Design Creationism” (by

#ApeMen Never #Existed - #HombreMono Nunca #Existió

EL HOMBRE MONO (APE MAN) NUNCA EXISTIÓ!

 atlanteanconspiracy,com

 

One of the first frauds in the history of Darwinism, known as “recapitulation theory,” and heralded as undeniable “proof of evolution,” was an idea proposed and propagated by a racist eugenicist Professor named Ernst Haeckel in the late 19th century.  A contemporary and friend of Charles Darwin and Thomas “Bulldog” Huxley, Haeckel postulated that human (and other animal) embryos experience a miniature form of the entire evolutionary impulse during their development in the womb, displaying first characteristics of fish, then reptile, and lastly mammalian or human.  It has long been eliminated from scientific literature, but many people and popular sources still unknowingly quote and believe in Haeckel’s fraudulent work.  Several popular

#Evolution is a #Lie - #IntelligentDesign is the #Truth

atlanteanconspiracy,com

The popular modern scientific-materialist-atheist worldview propagated by NASA, the mainstream media and the public education system is that you are here because nothingness for no reason exploded and created everything!  Before time, space, matter, consciousness, intelligence, and life, there was nothing.  Then the nothingness exploded, and instead of destroying things like every other explosion ever, this explosion created things, created everything!  The nothingness explosion somehow created space, time and all matter in the universe in an instant and for no reason at all.  Then all the creationary explosive debris flying outwards at over 670

#Destrucción #Global de la #Familia, los #Planes de la #ONU

Descubriendo el Veneno de la Ideología de Género 

¿El Plan? Destrucción GLOBAL DE LA FAMILIA 

Ex-Funcionaria Desvela los Planes de la ONU 

 angel2840148089.wordpress,com

PLAN GLOBAL DE Destrucción DE LA FAMILIA

Intentemos ponernos en el lugar de un globalista que busca un control absoluto del individuo (lo que él considera su siervo, su vasallo, su esclavo). ¿Cuál será la última oposición que encontrará en su psicópata ambición de controlar a los pueblos? Todo individuo miembro de cualquier comunidad humana tiene un sano y natural mecanismo de defensa en su familia: si te atreves a atacar, por ejemplo, a un gitano, tienes que saber que después de agredirle tendrás que derribar también a sus primos, a sus tíos, a sus cuñados, a los vecinos… Si llevamos esto a un nivel más amplio, comprendemos que el proceso globalizador tiene como mayor enemigo a la unidad familiar: si el individuo no tiene familia, queda indefenso a cualquier ataque gubernamental; si el individuo no tiene padre que le infunda coraje y osadía, estará sin defensa ante el adoctrinamiento secular del Establishment; si un individuo no tiene madre que le dé cariño y protección, el poder político podrá “criar” a esa persona al antojo de sus intereses. En palabras claras: sin tu papi y sin tu mami, el Gran Hermano tiene vía libre para devorarte. 

Adam WEISSHAUPT Los Iluminados de Baviera dijo: 

“se buscará la destrucción de la familia” 

Charles Darwin dijo una vez: “si podemos motivar a las mujeres a ir 

#Darwinian #Evolution Fails The #Scientific #Method

Here at TomatoBubble.com; we love all of our readers, including the Atheist / Evolutionists. From time to time an E-mail that reads something like the following will arrive in the inbox:

"Mike. I love your work but you really need to stick to history and current events. You do not understand the science behind Evolution and are only harming your credibility when you attack Darwin."

Though this type of feedback is certainly more cordial and tolerable than the occasional, "You are a stupid ignorant deranged 'Nazi' extremist who believes that a giant spaghetti monster created the universe in 7 days. Ha ha ha" - it is still a variation of the condescending you-do-not-understand-science ad hominem logical fallacy that Evolutionists always resort to. This rhetorical device is a weaponized trick that we shall now disarm. 

First of all, the lack of any extensive "scientific background" does not necessarily disqualify a logical thinker from expressing an opinion on Evolution or any other matter related to science. If a man observes a rapidly darkening sky on a brutally hot and humid summer afternoon; followed by a sudden temperature drop and distant rumbles of thunder; would his lack of a "background in meteorology" invalidate his opinion that rain is forthcoming?

If a man opts to take the elevator downstairs instead of simply jumping out of a 40th floor window and into his waiting convertible; would his lack of a "background in physics" invalidate his fear of jumping out of skyscrapers?

It doesn't take a scientist to discern the obvious.

This idea that any matters pertaining to science, or alleging to pertain to science, can only be discussed by those with the right "qualifications" is a clear example of another classic logical fallacy; the 'Appeal to Authority'. Every great philosopher from Buddha, to Confucius, to Plato, to Socrates, to Marcus Aurelius, to Jesus, to Schopenhauer and so many others specifically warned against the inherent errors associated with this type of boot-licking, group-thinking worship of authority figures. Buddha expressed the key to right thinking very well when he stated:

"Do not go by reports, by legends, by traditions, by scripture, by logical conjecture, by inference, by analogies, by agreement through pondering views, by probability, or by the thought."
 
In other words, "Don't assume things; and to hell with those diploma-decorated fools who think they know it all. Use your own reason and observation!"  And with that, let us dispense with this puffed-up patronizing rubbish about "lack of a scientific background" once and for all. You see, it doesn't take a "scientific background" to understand the basic and timeless principles of what is known as "The Scientific Method". Ironically, it is the hallowed Scientific Method which dooms the "theoretical science" of Darwinian Evolution to the toilet bowl of pseudo-scientific error.

 

Had Darwin studied Greek or Buddhist philosophy, he would never have made such a monkey of himself.

What is the Scientific Method?
The Scientific Method consists of the flow-chart steps shown in the following chart:

Charles #Darwin era de la #LunarSociety #Illuminati

DARWIN FUE UN OSCURO MASÓN DE LA LUNAR SOCIETY


QUE EXCRETÓ UNA TEORÍA FASCISTA AFÍN A LAS ÉLITES 

contraperiodismomatrix,com

(Editado y abreviado por O.R.)

NO HAY PRUEBAS FÓSILES



La insistencia en la selección natural, la ley de la selva, la eugenesia y el materialismo ateo justificaba otros dogmas culturales de las élites. Darwin era un magufo charlatán, un sinverguenza que fusiló todo a Wallace y era teólogo prestamista.

La Mafia X no pierde el tiempo, y no ha mantenido sus zarpas alejadas de la ciencia, de este modo se ha desarrollado la pseudociencia que rampla entre las aulas universitarias ante una multitud de anestesiados estudiantes.

La Teoria de la Evolucion Darwinista, falsamente científica, se basa en premisas teológicas imposibles de reproducir en ambientes experimentales y por ello nunca ha sido propia del campo de la ciencia sino de la teología, campo que Darwin conocía bien al ser un SUBGRADUADO EN TEOLOGÍA el único título que lo avala. De esta manera resulta mas sencillo comprender el debate Creacionismo/Darwinismo que se disfraza de científico en los medios propagandísticos.

No es posible reproducir la supuesta Selección Natural en un laboratorio porque es un ente inespecífico y todopoderoso que, como la mano invisible de Adam Smith en el Capitalismo, mueve a todo bicho viviente hacia la perfección por medio del comportamiento egoísta y competitivo de sus individuos…¿te suena? Algo huele a que Darwin había leido a Malthus.

El genetista T.H. Morgan dijo hace un siglo que la evolución significa “hacer cosas nuevas que no tengan que ver con las ya existentes”. Casi toda la teoría de Darwin es incompleta. No explica el origen de la mente

The #Darwinian #Fallacy Of The ' #SuperRat '

tomatobubble,com

We have all heard of the "Super Rats" - those "miracles of #Evolution TM" that have "mutated" into indestructible creatures immune to even the deadliest of rat poisons. With breathless enthusiasm the disciples of #Darwin hail these creatures as smoking gun evidence of "evolution on steroids". How pathetic that the 'Super Rats' phenomenon is the best "evidence" the Evolutionists can muster in support of Darwin's 'simple first cell - to amoeba - to fish - to amphibian - to ape - to man' delusion. Here is a typical example, from the London Telegraph, of the type of twisted tommy-rot that passes for "science", and "journalism" these days:

New 'Super Rats' Evolve Resistance to Poison

Rats across Britain are evolving a resistance to poison that makes them almost impossible to kill, scientists have warned.

"Genetic mutations have produced a new breed of "super rat" with DNA that protects the vermin from standard toxins, according to Professor Robert Smith at the University of Huddersfield."

And this from PBS (Propaganda - Bullshit -Sophistry):

Pesticide Resistance

"The chemical arsenal we have developed in an attempt to rid our homes of rodents and our crops of insects is losing its power. We have simply caused pest populations to evolve, unintentionally applying artificial selection in the form of pesticides. Individuals with a higher tolerance for our poisons survive and breed, and soon resistant individuals outnumber the ones we can control."

"Shhhh! Please don't rat me out as a fraud!"

And on and on the fallacy goes; promoted by the press, taught in the schools, enforced by the state, never questioned and never challenged. The most frustrating feature of this big lie is that is so simple to debunk. All it takes is a bit of thought and some common sense, yet the lie rolls on and on. Now you might say, "Wait a minute Mike. The Super Rat phenomenom is very real. The rats without immunity die. Those rats lucky enough to have the immunity survive, and the offspring of those survivors inherit the immunity. What's so hard to understand about that?"

Well, there is nothing hard to understand about that; and nobody disputes the existence of Super Rats. But the phenomenon only demonstrates natural selection (or, in this case, artificially-induced natural selection). But the rat remains a rat! Nothing changed. Nothing "evolved TM". Nothing "mutated". Not a single additional line of complex genetic code was added to the overall rat gene pool that wasn't already there to begin with. The surviving rats were already genetically immune to the poison. The dead ones were not. What type of insane "scientist" would make the galactic leap-of-faith from this common-sense example of natural selection, all the way to the 'simple first cell - to amoeba - to fish - to amphibian - to ape - to man' scenario?

The bottom line remains: trans-species evolution TM- let alone trans-genus, trans-family, trans-order, trans-class, trans-phylum, trans-kingdom - has never been observed; neither in the fossil record, nor in the current natural world. And anyone who tries to use the 'Super Rats' as a means to circumvent this Darwinian difficulty is either a criminal, an insane person, or just someone who hasn't given the matter much thought.

 Atheistic Evolutionists have yet to prove a single case of trans-species Evolution TM, yet, on the basis of 'Super-Rats', we are expected to jump all the way up the biological classification ladder to trans-Kingdom Evolution TM - which holds that both the lovely woman above and the inanimate rose that she is smelling have the same great grandmother [x]. 

"Fish become ape? Darwin stupid!"

To better dispel the Super Rat Fallacy, for the sake of those who still don't see through the scam, let make an analogy to biological weapons. The technology for engineering race-specific biological weapons does indeed exist. Let us all hope and pray that the weapons themselves do not exist in some secret laboratory! But suppose that some evil clandestine group were to poison the reservoirs and springs of Japan with a biological weapon that was lethal to people with a certain gene specific to Asiatics. (that's the analogy to the rat posion).

What would happen? Obviously, all of the Asiatic inhabitants of Japan would die after drinking the poisoned water. But what about the tiny minority of White expatriates, tourists, missionaries etc, present in Japan at the time of the great poisoning? The biological weapon wouldn't kill them. The "Whites of Japan" would survive, unchanged, and pass on their genetic immunity to the bio-weapon on to their offspring. (the analogy to the Super-Rat). One hundred years later, Japan could be a thriving island nation of 10 million White people, all speaking English too.

Now, what type of deranged crackpot mad-scientist would then dare to hypothesize, no, declare, that the Asiatics of Japan "mutated" into White people? See my point? And yet, this is exactly the type of madness that the great and the good of Academia are shoving down our throats as they denounce doubters as "uneducated" and "anti-science". Dirty rats!

In the bio-weapon analogy to 'Super Rats', the predominately Asiatic group on the left "mutates" into the totally White group on the right only because a dash of certain "White genes" are already present among a few of the population (girl on far left). That is NOT 'Evolution' TM.

Don't fall for Evolutionist Tricks!

READ THE GOD OF LOGIC

The #Darwinian #Myth Of 'The #Simple #Cell'

tomatobubble,com

Once upon a time, the Evolutionists assure us, a “simple single-cell life form” spontaneously emerged out of a protein-rich “primordial soup”, which, they assure us, also existed. Through the process of binary fission, single bacterial cells divided into multi-cellular organisms. Over billions of years, the family tree branched out to include all living things; from blades of grass, to maggots, to Marilyn Monroe. It’s amazing what a “simple” cell can do!

Charles Darwin had proposed that the very first cell, the universal common ancestor of all life forms, could have formed "in some warm little pond." One of Darwin's supporters, the German biologist (and proven forger) Ernst Haeckel, examined a mixture of mud removed from the sea bed and claimed that this was a nonliving substance that turned into a living one. This so-called "mud that comes to life," is an indication of just how simple life was thought to be by the founders of "The Theory of Evolution" (bow your head in solemn reverence as you say that).

Shhh! Please don't tell anyone that Haeckel and I are frauds."

By invoking the simplicity of that original simple cell, Evolution is made to sound somewhat plausible, at least to the easily impressed. The mispresentation of the original simple cell, slowly “evolving” into more complex cells, and then into actual creatures over time, is the only way that the Evolutionists can even begin to sell their junk-science. So, let’s attack the theory at its very root, "the simple cell".

Los #Gatos un Regalo a los #Egipcios

Los Gatos son GPS´s Alien, Regalo Anunnaki a los Egipcios

EL MAGUFO DARWIN NO PUEDE DEMOSTRAR QUE VENGAN DE LOS MIACIS

FUERON TRAÍDOS Y MODIFICADOS GENÉTICAMENTE DE NIBIRU A LA TIERRA

 

La misteriosa Gata Uti, el color de los ojos es así, no está trucado con Photoshop.

contraperiodismomatrix,com

(Editado y Abreviado por AntiNomEc)

ETERNO GUARDIÁN DE FRECUENCIAS

No parece de este mundo, porque sencillamente NO LO ES. Si hay un animal y mascota raro raro y enigmático es el gato, que inspiró muchos poemas del gran Baudelaire. En youtube en internet los vídeos más populares, por extraño que parezca, son los de gatos. Son únicos, misteriosos, indescriptibles y tienen “gato encerrado”, tesoro encerrado.

En Egipto los adoraban como Dioses y cuidaban los templos. ¿Por qué ? Porque son extraterrestres, los trajeron los anunnaki de Nibiru, por eso son tan raros y tienen características fisiológicas muy anormales, como su visión nócturna, ronroneo, resistencia a la muerte, su inteligencia, placidez y su caracter depredador, ya que estos animales fueron modificados genéticamente para cazar para los anunaki, como los guepardos, que no pueden retrare las garras como el resto de especies felinas.

Borges decía ” el gato es eterno, pues para él, el tiempo no existe”. Fíjate en un gato y verás su tranquilidad y calma. No tienen prisa. Pueden estar solos y no ser sociables y estar en casa sin salir. Relajados, tumbados, sin presión, disfrutando siempre de posturas cómodas de estética suprema y como los políticos y el Rey, siendo maestros en el don “de pasar el tiempo sin dar golpe”. En el Islam se hace el culto al Gato, se dice que el clon de Mahoma era un superfan de gatos. El Gato es guardián por Naturaleza, guarda las casas y las frecuencias y elimina las energías negativas que absorbe. Por ejmplo, el Maneki-neko o “gato de la suerte” es muy popular en la cultura japonesa. Los canalizadores o médiums a veces ven gatos que funcionan como “cables de transmisión de información esotérica telepática”. Son GPS´s alien.

LOS GATOS SON DEMASIADO LISTOS Y RAROS

PARA SER SÓLO ANIMALES

GATO VIENE DEL SIRIACO ANUNNAKI

La palabra gato viene del siriaco, de Siria, zona anunnaki total, donde ahora vuelven con guerrras falsas a robar y recuperar sus ooparts (artefactos fuera del tiempo).  Del siriaco pasó al egipcio una forma como “caute”. No viene del latín cautus o cattus como se dice.

Los anunnaki también crearon gatos que modificaron de sus felinos de Nibiru. En Nibiru los gatos son

El Darwinismo al Servicio de las Transnacionales

Desde la sombra (E66)

El darwinismo al servicio de las transnacionales

La cuestionada teoría de Darwin sobre el origen del hombre se emplea para reconstruir la propia concepción de la especie humana: desde un ser cognitivo semejante al Creador, a una criatura con instintos básicos. En esta ocasión, Daniel Estulin afirma que hoy la teoría de Darwin se utiliza para justificar todo, desde la ideología de la explotación brutal de poblaciones, hasta la creación del movimiento eugenésico, que en un momento histórico tocó su máximo en la purificación racial de Hitler.