Judge Sabraw: here’s something you didn’t know about the DPT shot…
by Jon Rappoport
I’ll repeat myself a bit here, in case you missed my last article. Then I’ll get into something else, something dangerous that a Federal Judge knows nothing about…
Federal Judge Dana Sabraw is overseeing a lawsuit against mandatory vaccination in California.
So far, Sabraw has denied a petition to suspend mandatory vaccination for school children while the case moves forward.
He believes tradition and history are on the side of forced vaccinations. That’s because he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Or he’s just making it up out of thin air.
As the LA Times reports: “U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw in San Diego wrote that state Legislatures have ‘a long history of requiring children to be vaccinated as a condition to school enrollment, and for as many years, both state and federal courts have upheld those requirements against constitutional challenge’.”
I don’t see how Judge Sabraw’s opinion could be more ridiculous.
Why? Because ‘the long history’ he refers to is quite different.
The states have always upheld exemptions from vaccination on several grounds: medical waiver, religious objection, philosophical objection. Hello? THAT’S the tradition.
SB277, the new CA law, goes against the tradition, to say the very least. SB277 breaks new ground in allowing the state to operate as a medical fascist in the area of vaccinations.
So…let’s look at one of the mandatory vaccines that’ll be injected into children in California, whether their parents agree or not. I’m talking about the DTP shot—diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough). Let’s give Judge Sabraw a history lesson. You know: actual history.
Buckle up.
“Assistant Secretary of Health Edward Brandt, Jr., MD, testifying before the U.S. Senate Committee