The Two Contending Visions of World Government
U.S. President Barack Obama’s proposed ‘Trade’ deals are actually
about whether the world is heading toward a dictatorial world
government — a dictatorship by the hundred or so global super-rich who hold the controlling blocks of stock in the world’s largest international corporations —
or else toward a democratic world government, which will be a global
federation of free and independent states, much like the United States
was at its founding, but global in extent. These are two opposite
visions of world government; and Obama is clearly on the side of
fascism, an international mega-corporate dictatorship, as will be
documented here in the links, and explained in the discussion.
Also as a preliminary to the discussion here is the understanding
that if Obama wins Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority, then all of his
‘trade’ deals will be approved by Congress and then be able to be
considered seriously by other governments, and that if he fails to
receive this Authority, then none of them will.
“Fast Track,” as will be explained in depth here, is, indeed, the
“open Sesame” for Obama, on the entire matter. Without it, his deals
don’t stand even a chance of passage.
I previously wrote about why it’s the case that “‘Fast Track’ Violates the U.S. Constitution.” The
details of the case are presented there; but, to summarize it here:
“Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority,” which was introduced by the
imperial President Richard M. Nixon in the Trade Act of 1974, violates
the U.S. Constitution’s Treaty Clause — the clause that says “The
President … shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the
Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur.” (In other words:otherwise, the President simply doesn’t have that power,
the President cannot “make treaties.” Nixon wanted to make treaties
without his needing to have two-thirds of the Senate vote