Garland Shooting Involved Troupe of Practiced War Propagandists and Patsies Long on the FBI's Watch List
ABC News confirms that one of the suspects of the Garland Texas
shooting incident, featuring professional war propagandists of the
so-called “American Freedom Defense Intitiative” (AFDI), has been under
FBI surveillance and investigation since at least as early as 2007.
Their report, “Garland Shooting Suspect Elton Simpson’s Father: ‘My Son Made a Bad Choice’,” states:
Followers of ISIS had been sending messages about the event in Texas for more than a week, calling for attacks. One referenced January’s Charlie Hebdo massacre in France and said it was time for “brothers” in the United States to do their part.
Simpson was well known to the FBI. Five years ago he was convicted for lying to federal agents about his plans to travel to Africa where investigators alleged he planned to join a terror group.
The investigation into Simpson reached back to July 2007, when he was recorded saying of fighting with Islamists, “I know we can do it, man. But you got to find the right people that… Gotta have connects.”
Despite the event allegedly increasing chatter amongst “Islamic
State” (ISIS) groups online, and despite the suspect Elton Simpson being
long under FBI surveillance and even sentenced to 3 years of probation
resulting from a terror-related investigation, he was still able to
conveniently conspire and carry out an attack on a highly provocative
propaganda stunt in the state of Texas.
Garland Shooting Fits Pattern of Larger Staged Terror Campaign
As with all other staged provocations, including similar shootings in
Paris, France, Copenhagen, Denmark, and Sydney, Australia, the suspects
were well known to state security agencies for years, but allowed to
conspire and carry out predictable, deadly, and politically highly
convenient attacks. All of this echos the similar and long-since exposed
staged provocations of the notorious “Operation Gladio,” carried out by
NATO.
In Paris, France, the suspects in the so-called “Charlie Hebdo Shooting” were under the watch of security forces for years,
were in and out of jail specifically for terrorism, were known to have
left
France to join terrorists fighting with Western-backing in Syria
and return, only to be left “unwatched” for precisely the 6 months they
would need to plan, assemble the weapons for, and prepare to execute the
attack.
In Copenhagen, an assailant who attacked
a synagogue killing 2, was also well known to security agencies. The
Washington Post would report in their article, “Danish attacks echo France,” that:
The assailant in this weekend’s attacks was well known to Danish intelligence, Madsen said. In November 2013, Hussein stabbed a teenager in the thigh while aboard a commuter train, and according to Danish media, he had recently been released from prison following his conviction.
But it was unclear whether this weekend’s assailant was under surveillance and, if so, how he managed to slip free long enough to plan an attack with an assault rifle.
Once again, suspects under surveillance and even arrested and
imprisoned as violent offenders or as terrorists, managed to
conveniently “slip free” of security agencies just in time to carry out
attacks that just so happen to help the West continue its
extraterritorial wars raging abroad, and continue building an abhorrent
police state back at home.
Finally, in Australia, a suspect who held up a cafe in a deadly
hostage crisis, was literally brought to Australia from Iran for the
purpose of waging a propaganda war on Iran. When this failed to
materialize,the “shape-shifting sheik”
would morph to fit the villain necessary to match whatever narrative
was currently being floated around the Western media. His final
performance would help bolster the illusion that ISIS is an enemy of the
West, rather than a creation and perpetuation of it, and to this day
serving as the West’s extraterritorial mercenary forces in nations like
Syria and Iraq.
A Modern Day Gladio
NATO’s Operation Gladio, and its larger “stay behind” networks
established after World War II across Europe and at the center of
multiple grisly assassinations, mass shootings, and terrorist bombings
designed to demonize the Soviet Union as well as criminalize and crush
support for left-leaning political parties growing in popularity in
Western Europe. It would be determined that NATO’s own covert militant
groups were killing innocent Western Europeans in order to effect a
“strategy of tension” used to instill fear, obedience, and control over
Western populations.
A similar campaign of staged terror has been and is still being
carried out not only across Europe but also now in the Americas - including in Canada.
The purpose of this campaign is to divide society socially and
politically, while helping to radicalize young people to join the ranks
of US-British-Saudi armed and funded mercenary groups abroad in nations
like Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Egypt, and Libya, and then return to commit
staged provocations to inspire fear, hatred, and obedience at home.
It is a conflict of which both sides are controlled by the same
criminal special interests. While it is clear that Western security
forces maintain a large pool of potential terrorists they intentionally
allow to roam free until needed, it may not be clear to many of what the
backgrounds are of those who organized the event in Garland, Texas that
allegedly provoked this most recent attack.
Neo-Con Propagandists Are Hiding Behind Freedom of Speech, Not Defending It
The supposed trigger for this provocation was a “draw Mohammad”
contest organized by the American Freedom Defense Intitiative (AFDI), a
performing Neo-Conservative propaganda troupe consisting
of the Bush-era US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton, full-time
propagandist Pamela Gellar and Robert Spencer, and Dutch politician
Geert Wilders.
Their debut performance was in 2010, where they came out to protest
the so-called “Ground Zero Mosque” supposedly to be built near the ruins
of the destroyed World Trade Center in New York City. The mosque was
never actually built, not because of the public backlash, but because
the entire controversy was manufactured. The “imam” allegedly behind the
mosque, was in fact a member of the Council of Foreign Relations,
funded and backed by the very same corporate-funded think tanks that set
out to protest against the planned “mosque.” In other words, the entire
scandal was manufactured on both sides by the same special interests for the purpose of manipulating the public.
Since then, with little success, AFDI and its various affiliates in
North America and Europe have attempted to stoke hatred not toward
“radical Islam,” terrorists, or the US-backed regimes arming and funding
them, but against all Muslims. Dutch politician Geert Wilders, for his
part, while claiming to be defending “free speech” in Texas, has been
busy trying to infringe on the rights of Muslims back in his home
country.
He has even gone as far as calling for the complete censorship of the Qu’ran. The Telegraph in their article, “Ban Koran like Mein Kampf, says Dutch MP,“ would report:
The Koran should be banned as a “fascist book” alongside Mein Kampf because it urges Muslims to kill non-believers, says Dutch populist MP Geert Wilders.
Wilders and the rest of AFDI are not exercising free speech, but are
in fact attempting to inspire fear, suspicion, hatred, and tangible
violence against not just “terrorists,” but all 1 billion plus
practitioners of the Islamic faith, many of whom are fighting and dying
this very moment battling real terrorists, ironically armed, funded, and
fully backed by the very Neo-Cons that have assembled AFDI.
Not only does AFDI hold freedom of speech in contempt and actively
set out to destroy it for others, they are now hiding behind it to
further strip the rights, peace, and stability away from people both in
the West and abroad. The so-called “War on Terror” that AFDI’s rhetoric
actively supports has served as the impetus to do everything from
expanding warrantless surveillance and an ever expanding police state at
home, to help garner support for wars of geopolitical conquest abroad.
Not About “Free Speech”
With these facts in mind, it is clear that “free speech” is a canard
used by both the “left” and “right” to distract from the real purpose of
the Garland shooting, and other acts of provocation like it. It
distracts from the fact that all of
the perpetrators have been well-known to security agencies for years,
even sentenced and/or imprisoned by various courts, as well as
investigated and kept under surveillance. It distracts from the fact
that the event at the center of the attacks was organized and carried
out by those who themselves have actively sought to curtail the freedoms
of others, not to mention foster wars that have ended or otherwise
destroyed the lives of millions. It distracts from the fact that the
very Neo-Cons telling the world to fear “Islam” represent the same
special interests arming and funding literal Al Qaeda and ISIS
terrorists across North Africa, the Middle East, and even Central and
East Asia.
The AFDI represents one insidious arm of a larger criminal conspiracy
that has verifiably helped end the lives of tens of thousands in Syria,
Iraq, Libya, Egypt, and Yemen since 2011. It also represents the same
special interests that lied to the world to justify invading Iraq in
2003, ending the lives of some 1 million people and leaving the country,
to this very day, in constant deadly chaos.
The Garland shooting is not about freedom of speech, but rather about
criminal special interests playing both sides of a manufactured
strategy of tension to achieve further bloodshed, death, and conquest
abroad, while inviting fear, division, and a growing police state
stripping us all of our rights here at home.
Neither the AFDI nor the patsies involved in the shooting deserve the
public’s sympathy or defense. Rather, they both demand the scrutiny and
vigilance required to break the rhetorical back of this conspiracy, and
strip away the support it receives from both sides of a
mass-manipulated public.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario