When "Trusted Sources" Mislead: YouTube, WHO, and the Thyroid Cancer Epidemic

Posted on: Sunday, May 5th 2024 at 3:00 am

Written By: 

GreenMedInfo Research Group

In a startling twist, YouTube's latest crackdown on medical misinformation, guided by the World Health Organization, may be inadvertently promoting one of the most pervasive and harmful forms of medical misinformation today: the overdiagnosis of thyroid cancer.

YouTube's new medical misinformation policy, which relies on WHO guidelines, could amplify the overdiagnosis of thyroid cancer by silencing critical voices that question the conventional wisdom. A recent study reveals that a significant proportion of YouTube videos by medical professionals endorse excessive thyroid cancer screening, potentially leading to overdiagnosis and unnecessary treatments. This inversion of the common narrative suggests that the real threat of medical misinformation may sometimes come from within the conventional medical establishment itself.

In a world where "misinformation" has become a buzzword, social media giants like YouTube are increasingly taking on the role of arbiter of truth. Their latest policy update, which expands the platform's power to remove content that contradicts World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, is a prime example of this trend.1 However, a closer examination reveals that this well-intentioned effort could inadvertently amplify one of the most pervasive forms of medical misinformation today: the overdiagnosis of thyroid cancer.

Globalists Plot Worldwide Genocide Via WHO Pandemic Treaty

 

Globalists Plot Worldwide Genocide Via WHO Pandemic Treaty By Richard C. Cook With all the trouble in today’s world, including the completely pointless American-instigated war in Ukraine, Israel’s loathsome genocidal onslaught against the Palestinians in Gaza, and militant U.S. threats to China over Taiwan, perhaps we should be asking whether the escalation in tensions threatening massive global conflict is really a carefully-crafted Globalist “false-flag” concealing something even more sinister. Read here

Canada’s Online Harms Act Bill C-63: Life in Prison for Thought Criminals By Rick Thomas Bill C-63, otherwise known as the Online Harms Act, is the most dangerous piece of legislation ever foisted on Canadians, and possibly the most dangerous piece of legislation currently on the books anywhere in the world. Read here

‘Genocide Joe’ Suffers Another Mortifying Slap-Down at the United Nations By Mike Whitney In a clear rejection of US policies and leadership in the Middle East, the UN general assembly voted overwhelmingly to back the Palestinian bid for full UN membership. The western media have mostly ignored Friday’s balloting since the widely-anticipated results represent another black eye for Washington. Read here

Top vaccine researcher REVEALS disturbing pandemic scenario, the risk versus benefit

by: Sara Middleton, staff writer | March 21, 2021

(NaturalHealth365) Recently, several countries in Europe made headlines when public officials decided to suspend the rollout of the AstraZeneca COVID vaccine due to concerns over post-vaccination blood clots.  The backlash is hardly unexpected, and both mainstream media and the World Health Organization (WHO) have wasted no time in condemning these countries’ precautionary actions and doing some serious PR damage control to quell the “panic” and urge countries like Germany, France, Spain, and Italy to continue administering the shot.

One might wonder why acting with an abundance of caution over the mass rollout of an unapproved investigational drug is considered unwarranted rather than logically and ethically prudent.  Many are also skeptical about why the WHO and other organizations so hastily deny any evidence of COVID vaccine deaths.  But perhaps, say some experts, we should be asking another question altogether: are the potential benefits of creating a so-called “vaccine” in the middle of an active pandemic even worth the risks?

Here’s why it makes no sense to accept a “Big pharma solution” in the middle of a pandemic, according to a prominent vaccine developer

The WHO Confirms that the Covid-19 PCR Test is Flawed: Estimates of “Positive Cases” are Meaningless. The Lockdown Has No Scientific Basis

 By Prof Michel Chossudovsky

The Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) test was adopted by the WHO on January 23, 2020 as a means to detecting the  SARS-COV-2 virus, following the recommendations of  a Virology research group (based at Charité University Hospital, Berlin), supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (For Further details see the Drosten Study)

Exactly one year later on January 20th, 2021, the WHO retracts. They don’t say “We Made a Mistake”. The retraction is carefully formulated. 

While the WHO does not deny the validity of their misleading January 2020 guidelines, they nonetheless recommend “Re-testing” (which everybody knows is an impossibility).

The contentious issue pertains to the number of amplification threshold cycles (Ct). According to Pieter Borger, et al

The number of amplification cycles [should be] less than 35; preferably 25-30 cycles. In case of virus detection, >35 cycles only detects signals which do not correlate with infectious virus as determined by isolation in cell culture…(Critique of Drosten Study)

The World Health Organization (WHO) tacitly admits one year later that ALL PCR tests conducted at a 35 cycle amplification threshold (Ct) or higher are INVALID. But that is what they recommended in January 2020, in consultation with the virology team at Charité Hospital in Berlin.

If the test is conducted at a 35 Ct threshold or above (which was recommended by the WHO), segments of the SARS-CoV-2 virus cannot be detected, which means that ALL the so-called confirmed “positive cases” tabulated in the course of the last 14 months are invalid.

According to Pieter Borger, Bobby Rajesh Malhotra, Michael Yeadon, et al, the Ct > 35 has been the norm “in most laboratories in Europe & the US”.

The WHO’s Mea Culpa

The #WHO and #BigPharma #Rejected by #Tanzania

The Relationship Between Income and Wealth Disparities and Negative Real Interest Rates

By Prof Rodrigue Tremblay, February 10 2021

Has a forty-year trend reached an apex? Indeed, official measures of economic disparities are at an all-time high. A question that begs to be answered is: to what extent can such a record inequality be traced back, at least partly, to the public policies that have been followed over the last forty years?

The WHO and Big Pharma Rejected by Tanzania: President John Magufuli Says COVID-19 Vaccines Are “Dangerous and Unnecessary” By Timothy Alexander Guzman, February 10 2021 There is a glimmer of hope in Africa in regards to the Covid-19 world-wide pandemic where there are no lockdowns, no mandatory facemasks and no required vaccines.

UK Bans China’s CGTN for Being Too Much Like the BBC By Brian Berletic, February 10 2021

The #SecondWave: #Testing, Testing, “#Covid is on the #Rise”

Video: The Second Wave: Testing, Testing, “Covid is on the Rise”. The Lockdown

By Peter Koenig and Prof Michel Chossudovsky, November 03 2020

Peter Koenig and Prof. Michel Chossudovsky discuss “The Second Wave” in a new GRTV video interview.

COVID and Its Man-Made Gigantic Collateral Damage: The Great Reset – A Call for Civil Disobedience By Peter Koenig, November 03 2020 According to the various associations of Doctors for the Truth, concluded based on their experience, more than 50% of the so-called RT-PCM deliver “false positives”.

It’s Only a Lawn Sign; Well, Perhaps Far More. How Being ‘a Minority’ Feels By Barbara Nimri Aziz, November 03 2020

Most Popular #Articles On #GlobalResearch.ca

 This Week's Most Popular Articles

Belgian Health Experts Demand Full Investigation into WHO for Faking COVID-19 Pandemic Ethan Huff, October 13 , 2020

Medical Doctor Warns that “Bacterial Pneumonias Are on the Rise” from Mask Wearing John C. A. Manley, October 6 , 2020

Video: "Crimes Against Humanity": The German Corona Investigation. "The PCR Pandemic" Reiner Fuellmich, October 7 , 2020

Thailand Protests Are Anti-Chinese, Not “Pro-Democracy”

The #Covid19 #Numbers #Game: The “#SecondWave” is #Based on #Fake #Statistics

 
Image CTV report, September

“Red zones”, travel bans, quarantines, “red lists”. A “Second Wave” has been announced. 

The fear campaign has gone into overdrive. Millions of people are lining up for Covid-19 testing.

Drastic state measures are contemplated, including restrictions on social gatherings, marriages, funerals, the closing down of restaurants and bars, the outright paralysis of civil society. 

Coming to the rescue of our citizens. What is the justification? 

This article focusses on the “Numbers Game”.  How statistics and “estimates” are used by politicians to justify the closure of the national economy and the derogation of fundamental civil rights.  

From the onset of the Covid crisis in January 2020, far-reaching decisions taken by the WHO and national governments have been justified by citing “estimates” of the Covid-19 disease as well “statistics” pointing to a  Worldwide spread of a new deadly coronavirus originating in Wuhan, China. 

Scientific analysis confirms that these estimates of “confirmed cases” tabulated by the WHO and the CDC are flawed. The tests do not detect or identify the virus. The figures are often manipulated to justify political decisions. Moreover, official studies confirming the identify of the SARS-CoV-2 virus have not been released. 

Both the concepts as well as the test results do not point to the existence of a Worldwide Covid-19 pandemic. Nor do they justify social distancing, the face mask and the closing down of the global economy.

Corruption prevails at the highest levels of government as well within the upper echelons of the United Nations system. The entire state apparatus as well as inter-governmental organizations are controlled by powerful financial interests. 

Millions of people are now being tested which contributes to increasing the number of so-called

The #True #Disturbing #Meaning of #WAP by #CardiB

Cardi B’s “WAP” is considered to be a “cultural phenomenon” and is described by mass media as “empowering” and “sex-positive”. However, when one understands the meaning behind the symbolism of the video, “WAP” takes a dark meaning that is at the exact opposite of “empowerment”. 

By Vigilant Citizen 

It doesn’t take a rap historian to know that WAP is not the first raunchy song in rap history. Over 30 years ago, 2 Live Crew released the highly explicit single Me So Horny which became a massive hit with teens across America. Soon after, major controversy ensued and, for the first time ever, a U.S. district court judge ruled this recording “obscene”.

The album was banned from sale in Florida and a lengthy legal battle ensued over the song’s lyrics. The decision to ban the album was later overturned on appeal. This final ruling – which was upheld by the US Supreme Court – was deemed as a victory for free speech. In the following years, the rap world saw a constant flow of raunchy songs, many of which were performed by female rappers. And nobody really batted an eye.

Fast-forward in 2020: WAP is unleashed onto the world. And everybody loses their minds. And, because it is 2020, people found a way to make this song about moist female genitals political and divisive. On one side, mass media gushed over the song (pun intended) with unlimited praise. Complex magazine called the song “the epitome of female empowerment” while the Los Angeles Times wrote

#Gates-#funded #poliovaccine causing #polioviruses, #WHO #admits

by: Sara Middleton, staff writer | September 11, 2020

 

(NaturalHealth365) When mainstream media has its way, any criticism of billionaire computer geek – turned so-called global health expert – Bill Gates is quickly quashed with accusations of “conspiratorial arrogance.”  But when even the World Health Organization (WHO) is forced to acknowledge that a polio vaccine funded by Gates is responsible for a polio outbreak, it’s nearly impossible not to feel alarmed by the billionaire’s huge presence in the worldwide medical sphere.

The outbreak in Africa is one of at least two dozen confirmed episodes of vaccine-derived polio outbreaks throughout the world over the past five years, affecting countries ranging from the Phillippines to Ukraine … and despite this news, we’re supposed to depend on a Bill Gates-backed COVID vaccine (rushed to market) – which “hopefully” restores life as usual after the coronavirus pandemic?!

Over a dozen cases: Polio outbreak in Africa linked to polio vaccine funded by Bill Gates

On September 1, 2020, the WHO announced on their website that just one month prior, the Federal

131 Ways For An #Infant to #Die

Posted on:

Tuesday, September 8th 2020 at 12:00 pm

 

Written By:

Neil Z. Miller

There are 130 official ways for an infant to die (as categorized in the ICD), and one unofficial way for an infant to die: following an adverse reaction to one or more vaccines.

There are 130 official ways for an infant to die. These official categories of death, sanctioned by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO), are published in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD).^1-3 When a baby dies, coroners must choose from among these 130 categories.

The official causes of death listed in the ICD include nearly every imaginable — and tragic — possibility. However, there is NO category for infant deaths caused by vaccines.⁴ This is odd because the federal government is aware that vaccines permanently disable and kill some babies — the very reason Congress established a "death and disability" tax on childhood vaccines more than 25 years ago when the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-660) created the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).

Many parents don't realize that when they purchase vaccines for their babies, the cost is taxed and the

#WorldHealthOrganization scrambling to save #credibility: Recants admission that #asymptomatic spread of #COVID19 is “very rare”

by: Sara Middleton, staff writer | June 22, 2020

(NaturalHealth365) Here’s a reasonable assumption: if it’s unlikely for an asymptomatic carrier of COVID-19 to spread the viral infection, then the measures made in response to the current pandemic outbreak – like business closures, mass surveillance, and compulsory face masks – were probably overblown at best, and at worst a serious infringement on the public’s unalienable right to pursue life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Of course, all along we’ve been made to believe by some officials that asymptomatic spread is a major force driving behind the pandemic disease.  So, it’s a hard pill to swallow when the beleaguered World Health Organization (WHO) recently admitted – then later, with their tail between their legs, changed their mind on the matter – that asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 is rare.

Oops: After admitting asymptomatic spread is rare, WHO backtracks and tries to water down their stance

On June 8 2020, the WHO held one of their weekly virtual press conferences (a transcript is available (online).  During the conference, the WHO’s technical lead Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove admitted that

#Taiwan: No #Lockdowns, Non #WHO Member, Unaffected by #COVID19

TAIWAN: No Lockdowns, No Closed Businesses, Non-WHO Member, and Relatively Unaffected by COVID-19

Posted on:

Saturday, May 2nd 2020 at 3:15 pm

Written By:

Brian Shilhavy

 

Originally published on www.healthimpactnews.com

Johns Hopkins University had predicted that Taiwan would have the second most COVID-19 cases in the world, due to its close proximity to Mainland China.

But astonishingly, in spite of being only 80 miles from the coast of China with over 400,000 of its 24 million citizens working in China, as of mid-April, the country only had 400 cases of COVID-19, and only 6 deaths. And the vast majority of their 400 cases came into the country from abroad.

All of this has happened without shutting down the country with lock downs, and with almost all of its businesses continuing to operate. Is Taiwan doing something else the rest of the world is largely missing?

This question will no doubt be asked for months or even years into the future, but it is a question well

The #TrueAgenda of the #WHO: A #NewWorldOrder #Modeled After #China

The WHO has been handling the COVID-19 outbreak in a specific matter. It went from downplaying the virus and lobbying against travel bans from China to pushing for the constant lockdown of the world and its economy. There’s a method behind the madness: The WHO is using the pandemic to move towards a New World Order that is modeled after China’s oppressive regime.
 

April 29, 2020
By Vigilant Citizen

Since the outbreak of COVID-19 outside of China, the World Health Organization (WHO) has taken a prominent role in the handling of the pandemic on a global level. The unquestioned power and influence of this organization created by the United Nations lead most governments around the world to shape their policies and pandemic response according to the WHO’s data and guidelines. In other words, nations enabled a global (and non-democratic) entity to dictate decisions that are taken on a national and local level.

The result of this direct pipeline between the WHO and national governments has been profound and far-reaching. Fueled by apocalyptic models and projections, governments were urged to confine their entire population while shutting down their entire economies for several months. The devasting consequences of this global lockdown are still difficult to quantify. However, a prediction made in my article COVID-19 Lockdown: A Global Human Experiment quickly came to fruition: Billions of dollars were funneled from the working class towards the elite.

A Fast Company headline about the financial elite profiting from the pandemic.

So why is the WHO giving orders to nations and their democratically elected governments? Is it due to its proven track record and educated advice? Clearly not. Because the organization’s response to the pandemic at its earliest and most critical stages was nothing less than disastrous. Some might