FULL ARTICLE + PHOTOS
https://realnewsandhistory.com/anyt-08-29-25/
"The Crime of the Century"
NY Times: The Lindbergh Baby Kidnapping:
A Grisly Theory and a Renewed Debate
Rebuttal by THE ANTI-NEW YORK TIMES
On March 1, 1932, Charles Lindbergh Jr., the 20-month-old "baby" (a toddler, actually) of famed trans-Atlantic aviator Charles Augustus Lindbergh -- and grandson of anti-Federal Reserve / anti-World War I Congressman Charles August Lindbergh -- was abducted from his crib in the upper floor of the Lindbergh home in East Amwell, New Jersey. Two months later, the child's beaten corpse was discovered by the side of a nearby road. Two years later, a German immigrant named Bruno Richard Hauptmann was arrested for the ghastly crime.
In early 1935, Hauptmann, a young husband and father, was found guilty and sentenced to death. He continued to profess his innocence until all of his appeals failed. On April 3, 1936 -- (a time when the Jewish propaganda war against Hitler's Germany was intensifying) -- he was executed in the electric chair at the New Jersey State Prison. Questions as to the accuracy of the verdict -- issued at a time when the authorities were under intense pressure to solve the heinous crime -- have continued ever since.
But now, there is a new theory being put forth that has evidently been taken seriously by enough (((people))) that it merited mentioning in "the paper of record." Some (((people))) are now asserting that Lindbergh himself, as part of a "Nazi"-like "eugenics" experiment, killed his own son! From the article:
But now, there is a new theory being put forth that has evidently been taken seriously by enough (((people))) that it merited mentioning in "the paper of record." Some (((people))) are now asserting that Lindbergh himself, as part of a "Nazi"-like "eugenics" experiment, killed his own son! From the article:
"Lise Pearlman, a retired California judge, now speculates that Lindbergh was capable of something even more sinister: sacrificing his son for scientific experiments that led to the child’s death.
“I take advantage of the distance in time to treat the boy’s father as a potential suspect in his kidnap and murder; like all the others on the list, a fallible human being, not a demigod,” Ms. Pearlman wrote in a 2020 book, “The Lindbergh Kidnapping Suspect No. 1: The Man Who Got Away.”
Ms. Pearlman acknowledged that her findings were based on circumstantial, yet compelling, evidence about the crime scene, the condition of the boy’s remains and the research that Lindbergh was conducting at the time with Dr. Alexis Carrel, a Nobel Prize-winning surgeon and organ transplant pioneer. ... She speculates that Lindbergh colluded with Dr. Carrel, his friend to experiment on his son. (emphasis added)
*
Vile slanderous she-devil! The Yenta Pearlman (cough cough), supported in her absurd theory by lawyer / activist Barry Scheck (cough cough) --- no doubt still carries a multi-generational grudge over Lindbergh's acceptance of a medal from the "Nazi" regime as well as his "infamous" statement (in 1941) that Jews were one of the groups agitating for entry in World War II. These people are as sick as they are vindictive.
The irony of this Slimes article -- for "The Editorial Board" of the Anti-New York Times, that is -- is that we discover something which your favorite investigative journalist here had previously never learned in school nor ever heard on the tellie or even online. This one is a real stunner --- the payoff statements are highlighted in bold red:
"Ms. Pearlman worked with a New Jersey pathologist, Dr. Peter Speth, who evaluated records from the crime scene and autopsy, which showed that all the boy’s organs other than the heart and liver were missing. At the time, investigators deduced that foraging animals had mutilated the body as it lay in the woods.
Dr. Speth said the apparent absence of vermin on the boy’s remains — and clues suggesting the child’s face and one of his feet decayed more slowly than other parts of the body — indicated that the body had been dumped in the woods well after the abduction. “Bruno could not have conceived of it and could not have carried it out,” Dr. Speth said in an interview. He called Hauptmann’s execution “a terrible miscarriage of justice.”
* Organ removal? The boy killed not long before the blood-related "Holy Day" of Passover? We also learn of "a hole over the right ear." Oy vey! This sounds like a ritualistic Satanic killing of a child!
Had any of "youse guys" ever heard about the removal of organs from little Charles' body before? Thanks Ms. Pearlman! We're in agreement with the part about Hauptmann either being framed -- or perhaps being duped and manipulated into participating in something for which he did not know the "bigger picture" -- but this raises the question: Who would want to ritually murder the blonde-haired son of the "Nazi" Sympathizer Charles Lindbergh, and then frame and execute a German immigrant for the crime? Now there's a real brain-teaser for ya --- the stuff of Rubik's Cube. (rolling eyes)
It seems like the "usual suspects" got a "twofer" out of this deal -- eh, Ms. Pearlman?
Hauptmann framed? A certain inner Satanic sect of Judaism has been involved in this nasty business from time immemorial -- you know, the so-called "blood libel?"
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today about a theory that Charles Lindbergh may have sacrificed his own son for medical experiments.
Boobus Americanus 2: Interesting. Well, he was pro-Nazi.
*St Sugar: Why iss it never a "blood libel" when the frickin' &@%# make up the mosst outlandissh unssubsstantaited accussationss againsst uss goyim!
Editor: That's known as "projection." (((They))) do it 6,000,000 times a day
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario