Aquí reposa la verdadera historia reciente del ser humano, desde el año 2013 hasta nuestros días, historia que será ocultada a las futuras generaciones.
Here lies the true recent history of humans, from 2013 to present day, a history that will be hidden from future generations.
With the official government
narrative of the 9/11 attack filled with a plethora of lies that have
since been subsequently exposed, the next biggest “war on terror” event
on US soil that the feds failed to stop was the April 2013 Boston
Marathon bombings. And now the lone living suspect from that horrific
crime that killed three people, left 17 limbless and injured 264 victims (though that number’s been accused of being purposely inflated)
has now been found guilty of all 30 counts after the jury’s 11 hour
deliberation earlier this week. As we mark the second anniversary of
this tragic event and the second and final phase of the trial beginning
on Monday that will decide the fate of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev – whether he’ll
live out the rest of his life in prison or be put to death, a critical
review of preceding events and developments surrounding his high
profile, extremely significant case seems both timely and much needed.
Despite Dzhokhar Tsarnaev pleading not guilty to the 30 counts (17
carrying the death penalty) he was charged within a week after the April
15th bombings last year, his lead defense attorney Judy Clark several days ago conceded to the jury that her client was guilty in
her closing argument. Apparently blaming the dead brother whose due
process was denied became Dzhokhar’s only defense strategy. The defense
team insisted
Last week, after almost four months of silence, I published a 2400-word initial account about what’s been learned about the man who became a daily fixture on cable and network news when his nephews were accused in the Boston attack. Ruslan Tsarni is also—and not coincidentally—an unacknowledged spook with ties to the CIA.
On a personal note, I figured the astonishing news would let my four-month absence here pass unnoticed. I was wrong. Major scandals and jaw-dropping disclosures no longer pack the wallop they once did. After last week’s story I received expressions of concern—”Daniel, I was getting worried that we’d lost you!”— and more pointed questions as well: “Where have you been?”
So that—the personal note—is mostly what this story is about. That, along with a few observations about the extraordinary world of Ruslan Tsarn, filled with people who run the gamut from fugitive billionaire bankers to England’s Prince Andrew, from what a Judge in London called an “international network of criminals,” to Chechen terrorists.
Former top CIA official Graham Fuller lied in a press interview about his former son-in-law, Ruslan Tsarni, the uncle of “The Brothers Tsarnaev,” Tamerlan, now dead, and Dzhokhar, soon to go on trial in Boston for allegedly planting a homemade pressure-cooker bomb packed with shrapnel near the finish line of the Boston Marathon.
“A story on the Internet implying possible connections between Ruslan (Tsarni) and the Agency through me is absurd,” Fuller said in an Apr 27 2013 story headlined “Former CIA officer: ‘Absurd’ to link uncle of Boston suspects, Agency,” in Washington-D.C.-based Al-Monitor, which bills itself as the “Pulse of the Middle East.”
Fuller was responding to an exclusive report published here headlined “Was Boston Bombers ‘Uncle Ruslan’ with the CIA?”,which he and reporter Laura Rosen churlishly refused to credit, calling it merely a “story on the Internet” even as they labored to debunk it. Yet it was reported and re-published so widely in the aftermath of the Boston Marathon terror attack that Fuller felt compelled to respond.
Well, compelled to respond may be a little strong. Still, respond he did, in an interview which marshalled arguments to indicate questioning whether Ruslan Tsarni’s connection with the CIA had been through his famous former father-in-law were not just an exercise in futility. They were absurd.
Just to be clear, there is zero evidence to indicate either Uncle Ruslan Tsarni or the CIA hired the Tsarnaev Brothers to blow up Boston. There is, however, abundant evidence that elements of the U.S. Government have been playing footsie with Chechen terrorists, presumably to divert Russia from committing the kind of rash Neo-Communist Gangster stuff they’d be doing already unless we’re very very careful.
Here’s a troubling question: If it was blow-back from that campaign which blew up in Boston—throwing covert U.S. support at Chechen terrorists—do you think anyone in the U.S. Government is eager to let the American people in on that no-doubt classified-for-reasons-of-national-security secret?
Why, the very idea seems—to use Mr. Fuller’s word—absurd.
Uncle Ruslan meets ‘the boys’
In his interview, Graham Fuller admitted that a second bombshell disclosure in an exclusive Apr 26, 2013, report headlined Boston bombers’ uncle married daughter of top CIA official, also was true: The Tsarnaev Brothers’ uncle, Ruslan Tsarni, was his former son-in-law.
Tsarni was married toGraham Fuller’s daughter Samantha between 1994 and sometime near the dawn of the millenium, Fuller grudgingly admitted. Still, he insisted,without explanation, that suggestions that law enforcement should be checking to see if Ruslan Tsarni had “hooked up” with the CIA through Fuller were “absurd.”
The Gestapo-like tactics that were implemented in Boston last week by the military-style police forces are just a small sign of things to come in America… including a large spike in military-style drones flying over — and spying on — American cities as well as a new influx of high definition security cameras in major U.S. cities.
As we expected, the power hungry elites in Washington are using the Boston bombings to force a false choice on the American “sheeple”.
And they are using the corporate-controlled media to spread their delusional attempts at a massive power grab.
Todo estaba perfectamente planificado, el auto-atentado de Boston se hacía en honor al auto-atentado de Sandy Hook perpetrado por Adam Lanza. El fin es quitar todas las libertades al ciudadano, quitar las armas para que la población quede indefensa en caso de una toma de poder abrupta por parte del gobierno. Todo está interconectado, todos los atentados son similares, sino revisemos el 11M (11!), Sandy Hook que lo hemos detallado en nuestras anteriores entradas. Pero para todo esto ya existe un culpable, un genio qué realizó todo esto sin ser detectado (o ya lo tenían visto). Han encontrado ya a su cabeza de turco, al pobre gil que pagará todos los pecados. ¿Habrán encontrado su pasaporte entre los escombros?
El corredor Ali Stevenson dijo que vio perros buscando
bombas antes de las explosiones
Todo lo sucedido es una continuación de la masacre de Sandy Hook ocurrida el 14 de diciembre de 2012. Dentro de los muertos se encontraba la madre del perpetrador Nancy Lanza, además de 20 niños y 6 adultos. Teniendo todo montado aprovecharon para preparar otro cerca de la zona, se valieron de un evento deportivo masivo clave.
Uno como persona normal no puede entender todo esto de golpe, por eso para poder visualizar y comprender tenemos que pensar como el Consejo de los 13, como agentes de la CIA, que preparan todo esto en nombre del Nuevo Orden Mundial.
Cada paso es medido, primero nadie sabe quién lo hizo (por ejemplo en el atentado de Oklahoma), pero ya dicen que es ataque terrorista. Las bombas eran ollas de presión, artefactos utilizados por la CIA-Mossad-MI6 para inculpar al inexistente grupo Al-Qaeda.
Ordo Ab Caos
Estas no son teorías de conspiración, son Teorías de la Verdad. Todo está diseñado para crear el caos. Los Illuminati utilizan este lema alquímico a menudo “Ordo ab Caos”, el orden a través del caos. Con este tipo de atentados generan miedo, terror, caos, luego se inventan guerras, leyes, y la población sedienta de “justicia” dejan que esto pase.
Family Guy
Al poco tiempo de presentadas las explosiones un video recorrió el Internet diciendo que el programa de televisión Family Guy (Padre de Familia) predecía el auto-atentado en Boston. Luego se comprobó que esto era una mentira, que alguien había editado dos capítulos distintos y había montado todo este espectáculo. Los Illuminati de Fox retiraron el video de Internet.
Thomas Menino
El actual alcalde de Boston es un Illuminati así como el antiguo alcalde Ray Flynn. Menino fue embajador de EE.UU. en la Santa Sede. Apareció en la Conferencia de Prensa sentado en una silla de ruedas, al igual que en el video de Family Guy, junto al ganador de la maratón. Menino es un asiduo defensor del control de armas, diciendo que toda arma ilegal debe salir de las calles, al mismo tiempo no es amigo de los homosexuales. Menino es parte de todo este macabro plan. Ya hacia campaña a favor del control de armas antes de la tragedia de Sandy Hook, él sabía todo lo que se estaba tramando.
Como ya lo dijimos, la maratón era el evento perfecto para un atentado así, 42km de recorrido, fácil planificación de las detonaciones, fácil huida, todo. Sorprendentemente ese mismo día realizaban pruebas sobre explosivos y sobre un nuevo sistema anti-masacres de defensa anti-terrorista. Recordemos que lo mismo ocurrió durante el 9/11 y el 11M, justos esos días, se realizaban pruebas de entrenamiento para defensa de la nación.
El templo masón satánico
EL TEMPLO MASÓN SATÁNICO OLD SOUTH CHURCH DE FONDO
EL RELOJ MARCA 11,11: NO ERA DE LONDRES, SINO DE BOSTON
Las Imágenes
Todo esto es preparado, testigos relatan que no se habían enterado de nada hasta que vieron la bendita televisión. Todas las imágenes son manipuladas, tiene que crear el pánico y meter miedo utilizando macabras imágenes, esta es una técnica conocida, la inventó el Instituto Tavistock de Londres para el control mental. Estas imágenes quedan en el cerebro, lo golpean, dejan una huella permanente, sino recordemos las espeluznantes imágenes de la matanza al líder libio Mu'ammar al-Qaḏḏāfī, no son coincidencia, esas imágenes tiene que salir para crear el pánico, para asustar a la gente, esto es control mental puro.
Logo de la Maratón
El logo de la maratón tiene el color azul y amarillo masón, además el unicornio MK-Ultra. El unicornio se utiliza para la programación cerebral MK-Ultra Beta de prostitutas y Delta de asesinos, representa el trance sexual y el sacrificio alquímico. El FBI delimitó la zona con cinta amarilla (la zona ritual), el color amarillo también es MK-Ultra como podemos apreciar en la cinta El Mago de OZ. (En otra ocasión escribiré detenidamente del Mago de Oz). El maratón es organizado por un grupo de masones de Boston.
El comic Blackjack
Este comic trata sobre los atentados, aunque no ocurrieron en 2012 si se hablaba de Boston y otras ciudades, el mundo entraría en una alerta nuclear, como ha sucedido luego de la crisis en Corea del Norte.
En el comic estos ataques se contestan con guerras a Irán, Siria y China. Habla sobre implementar la fase 3 de alerta: “hay que traer a nuestra gente -avisa un militar- hemos escogido a Boston y nuestro enviado se está colocando en posición”
“LA MENTIRA MÁS GRANDE EN LA HISTORIA DEL MUNDO”
POLICÍAS ENCUENTRAN BOMBA EN BOSTON …Y FUE FABRICADA EN LA UNA (ONU)
Un militar dice: “hemos sido engañados por una mentira monstruosa”…. “Pruebas en la bomba de Boston muestran que no venía ni de China, Irán o Siria….. pero sí de la misma unión norteamericana lo que demuestra es que nuestro gobierno es corrupto…Y todo se va al infierno”.
Todas estas cosas salen en comics, videojuegos y Hollywood. Dejan avisos de la agenda psicópata Illuminati. Lo hacen porque no tienen que hacer, tienen mucho tiempo libre y no saben en qué gastar todo su dinero. Se divierten con nosotros.
Como lo he venido diciendo, el mundo en el que vivimos es solamente un reflejo del mundo real. La elite dominante nos vende lo que quieren que creamos, nosotros aceptamos lo que nos conviene y cada cual vive feliz en un mundo ilusorio. Todo lo demás permanece oculto y la maquinaria de destrucción continúa su labor como uno de los famosos relojes suizos. Como curiosidad, ¿ustedes sabían que en Suiza es obligatorio por ley que los propietarios de inmuebles y todos los nuevos edificios habitables tengan un búnker atómico?
Nuevamente recurriremos al escritor español Luis Carlos Campos (LCC) para desentrañar todo está patraña denominada “Atentado Terrorista en Boston” y esclarecer muchos asuntos incomprensibles para
After the bombings that killed and maimed so horribly at the Boston Marathon, our country’s politics and mass media are awash in heartfelt compassion — and reflexive “doublethink,” which George Orwell described as willingness “to forget any fact that has become inconvenient.”
In sync with media outlets across the country, the New York Times put a chilling headline on Wednesday’s front page: “Boston Bombs Were Loaded to Maim, Officials Say.” The story reported that nails and ball bearings were stuffed into pressure cookers, “rigged to shoot sharp bits of shrapnel into anyone within reach of their blast.”
Much less crude and weighing in at 1,000 pounds, CBU-87/B warheads were in the category of “combined effects munitions” when put to use 14 years ago by a bomber named Uncle Sam. The U.S. media coverage was brief and fleeting.
One Friday, at noontime, U.S.-led NATO forces dropped cluster bombs on the city of Nis, in the vicinity of a vegetable market. “The bombs struck next to the hospital complex and near the market, bringing death and destruction, peppering the streets of Serbia’s third-largest city with shrapnel,” a dispatch in the San Francisco Chronicle reported on May 8, 1999.
And: “In a street leading from the market, dismembered bodies were strewn among carrots and other vegetables in pools of blood. A dead woman, her body covered with a sheet, was still clutching a shopping bag filled with carrots.”
Pointing out that cluster bombs “explode in the air and hurl shards of shrapnel over a wide radius,” BBC correspondent John Simpson wrote in the Sunday Telegraph: “Used against human beings, cluster bombs are some of the most savage weapons of modern warfare.”
Savage did not preclude usage. As a matter of fact, to Commander in Chief Bill Clinton and the prevailing military minds in Washington, savage was bound up in the positive attributes of cluster bombs. Each one could send up to 60,000 pieces of jagged steel shrapnel into what the weapon’s maker described as “soft targets.”
An unusually diligent reporter, Paul Watson of the Los Angeles Times, reported from Pristina, Yugoslavia: “During five weeks of airstrikes, witnesses here say, NATO warplanes have dropped cluster bombs that scatter smaller munitions over wide areas. In military jargon, the smaller munitions are bomblets. Dr. Rade Grbic, a surgeon and director of Pristina’s main hospital, sees proof every day that the almost benign term bomblet masks a tragic impact. Grbic, who saved the lives of two ethnic Albanian boys wounded while other boys played with a cluster bomb found Saturday, said he had never done so many amputations.”
The LA Times article quoted Dr. Grbic: “I have been an orthopedist for 15 years now, working in a crisis region where we often have injuries, but neither I nor my colleagues have ever seen such horrific wounds as those caused by cluster bombs.” He added: “They are wounds that lead to disabilities to a great extent. The limbs are so crushed that the only remaining option is amputation. It’s awful, awful.”
The newspaper account went on: “Pristina’s hospital alone has treated 300 to 400 people wounded by cluster bombs since NATO’s air war began March 24, Grbic said. Roughly half of those victims were civilians, he said. Because that number doesn’t include those killed by cluster bombs and doesn’t account for those wounded in other regions of Yugoslavia, the casualty toll probably is much higher, he said. ‘Most people are victims of the time-activated cluster bombs that explode some time after they fall,’ he said.”
Later, during invasions and initial periods of occupation, the U.S. military dropped cluster bombs in Afghanistan and fired cluster munitions in Iraq.
Today, the U.S. State Department remains opposed to outlawing those weapons, declaring on its official website: “Cluster munitions have demonstrated military utility. Their elimination from U.S. stockpiles would put the lives of its soldiers and those of its coalition partners at risk.”
The State Department position statement adds: “Moreover, cluster munitions can often result in much less collateral damage than unitary weapons, such as a larger bomb or larger artillery shell would cause, if used for the same mission.” Perhaps the bomber(s) who stuffed nails and ball bearings into pressure cookers for use in Boston had a similarly twisted rationale.
But don’t expect explorations of such matters from the USA’s daily papers or commercial networks — or from the likes of NPR’s “Morning Edition” and “All Things Considered,” or the PBS “NewsHour.” When the subject is killing and maiming, such news outlets take as a given the presumptive moral high ground of the U.S. government.
In his novel 1984, Orwell wrote about the conditioned reflex of “stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought . . . and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction.”
The doublethink — continually reinforced by mass media — remains within an irony-free zone that would amount to mere self-satire if not so damaging to intellectual and moral coherence.
Every news report about the children killed and injured at the finish line in Boston, every account of the horrific loss of limbs, makes me think of a little girl named Guljumma. She was seven years old when I met her at an Afghan refugee camp one day in the summer of 2009.
At the time, I wrote: “Guljumma talked about what happened one morning last year when she was sleeping at home in southern Afghanistan’s Helmand Valley. At about 5 a.m., bombs exploded. Some people in her family died. She lost an arm.”
In the refugee camp on the outskirts of Kabul, where several hundred families were living in squalid conditions, the U.S. government was providing no help. The last time Guljumma and her father had meaningful contact with the U.S. government was when it bombed them.
War thrives on abstractions, but Guljumma was no abstraction. She was no more or less of an abstraction than the children whose lives have been forever wrecked by the bombing at the Boston finish line.
But the same U.S. news media that are conveying the preciousness of children so terribly harmed in Boston are scarcely interested in children like Guljumma.
I thought of her again when seeing news reports and a chilling photo on April 7, soon after 11 children in eastern Afghanistan were even more unlucky than she was. Those children died from a U.S./NATO air strike. For mainline American journalists, it wasn’t much of a story; for American officials, it was no big deal.
“Circus dogs jump when the trainer cracks his whip,” Orwell observed, “but the really well-trained dog is the one that turns his somersault when there is no whip.”
