Biggest #Scam in the #World (Must Watch) - Mayor #Engaño del #Mundo (Deber Mirarse)

Para nuestros lectores de habla hispana se les recomienda traducir el video ya que es de suma importancia para entender como nos engañan y nosotros permanecemos inmutables ante estos sinvergunezas.

#Ecuador: #Desnudar al #Oligarca

percy-francisco.blogspot,com

Después de protagonizar violentas demostraciones contra el gobierno de Rafael Correa, principalmente en Quito, la oposición ultraderechista ha convertido a Guayaquil en escenario de sus iracundas demostraciones, con la singularidad de que sus máximos gestores son dos encumbradas estrellas de la oligarquía porteña (y nacional, claro): el Alcalde Jaime Nebot Saadi y el banquero Guillermo Lasso. El primero, saltando de su conocida condición de ‘líder cantonal’ al plano de presidenciable a la fuerza, y el segundo como presidenciable a tiempo completo, sin que nadie lo llame. 

La movilización decretada por el Alcalde se compondrá, en buena medida, de empleados y policías municipales, sin que se descarte una importante participación de elementos populares, que irán detrás de conocidos caballeros y matronas que, por ahora, vestirán trajes modestos a fin de ocultar su faz de pelucones. Y claro ocultarán las banderas y camisas negras del fascismo que representan para lucir camisetas con la benévola imagen del Papa Francisco. Todo vivamente calculado. Lo que no podrán esconder es el odio que destilan contra las propuestas de cambio de la Revolución Ciudadana, en particular contra cualquier intento de tocarles el bolsillo, donde guardan dineros legítimos y fortunas mal habidas. 

Como quiera que sea, la manipulación alcaldicia tendrá algún éxito, aumentado en forma gigante por la complicidad de los medios privados, que comen en la misma mesa de la oligarquía. Así tendremos que si Nebot reúne 20 mil seguidores, los medios gritarán ¡50 mil!, y si congrega 30 mil, los medios clamarán ¡100 mil! Y la masa, predispuesta al engaño, les creerá. 

Pero bien. Vamos a otro punto. El relativo éxito de estas manifestaciones sus capos deben agradecerle a Alianza País, cuyo despiste, desorganización e inoperancia son proverbiales y demuestran que no aprendió nada de las clamorosas derrotas de febrero 2014, ocasionadas por el oportunismo, la ceguera política y el sectarismo. Sus personeros, además de lanzar en forma inoportuna la consigna de la reelección presidencial, proclamaron como meta luminosa la carnetización de un millón de adherentes. Ahora surgen las preguntas: ¿llegaron siquiera a medio millón en más de un año? Y cualquier número de miles que hubieren carnetizado, ¿dónde están? 

Reconozcamos la verdad. Si no fuera por la propia acción del presidente Correa (sabatinas, inauguración de obras, entrevistas, exitoso reconocimiento internacional, etc.), no se sabría de la existencia de Alianza País. 

Frente a esta realidad se impone con urgencia que tanto el gobierno como todo lo que sea recuperable de la organización política se movilicen para mostrar a la ciudadanía, con pelos y señales, con nombres propios y ubicación concreta, qué es la oligarquía, quiénes son los oligarcas, cuánta fortuna han acumulado y porqué medios, cuáles son sus vínculos con los grandes medios, con la banca internacional, con la Chevron y otras multinacionales. 

Una demostración de esta naturaleza, publicitada a los cuatro vientos a través de les medios públicos y de toda clase de iniciativas, le quitaría piso a la falaz y engañosa propaganda de la restauración conservadora. 

Por su parte, en cada provincia, en cada ciudad los jóvenes revolucionarios podrían y deberían hacer un ejercicio público concreto: desnudar al oligarca. Que en todas partes hay ejemplos. Esto mientras se implementan medidas y acciones para que la patria avance, teniendo como bandera decisiva los cambios sociales, retomando las propias tesis del Presidente, como aquella de que “sin Revolución Agraria, no hay Revolución Ciudadana”.

Desde la sombra: Las logias masónicas (E46)

Desde la sombra: Las logias masónicas. Una fantasmagoría viva (E46)

Imagínense un club donde los presidentes, primeros ministros y banqueros se mezclan entre sí, donde la realeza está presente para asegurarse de que todo el mundo se lleva bien, donde la gente poderosa, que desata guerras, influye en los mercados y dicta a Europa entera sus órdenes, dice lo que nunca se ha atrevido a decir en público. En este episodio Daniel Estulin les invita a las sesiones de la logia masónica. ¡Bienvenidos a la P2!

Bankers Taking over the World / Los banqueros se toman el mundo

El Verídico Nuevo Orden Mundial. Los Banqueros se Toman el Mundo

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-real-new-world-order-bankers-taking-over-the-world/5322085

The Real New World Order. Bankers Taking over the World

By John Kozy

How quickly best laid plans become passé. New world orders come, it seems, as frequently as eclipses.

The old world order (ancien régime), along with 16 million people, died during the Great European War which began on June 28, 1914 when the Austrian heir to the throne, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, was assassinated by a Serb nationalist, Gavrilo Princip, in Sarajevo. (Today he would be called a terrorist.) This assassination sent nations that had no desire to go to war into the most destructive war the world had yet experienced.

Europe at the beginning of 1914 consisted of six major empires and an assortment of minor states that the major empires didn’t care much about. The six major empires, (the Austro-Hungarian, French, German, British, Ottoman, and Russian) were ensnared in military alliances (much like the US is today) which were formed to keep the peace. The diplomats, like those today, believed that forming alliances that balanced the powers of different groups would keep them from attacking each other. The Central Powers consisted of Austro-Hungary, Germany, and the Ottoman Empire; the Triple Entente consisted of the other three. Peace, the diplomats thought was assured. What happened?

When the archduke was assassinated, the Austrians, confident in their military prowess (as Americans are today), decided to punish Serbia which was attacked on July 28. But the Serbs ambushed the Austrians at the battles of Cer and Kolubara. The Austrians were thrown back with heavy losses. Russia came to the aid of its ethnically related Serbs, and Germany invaded France through Belgium and Luxembourg. Britain came to the defense of France and the Ottoman Empire joined the war in the Balkans on the side of the Central Powers. The alliances that were to ensure the peace changed a single assassination into a massive war. When it was over, the Austro-Hungarian, the German, the Ottoman, and the Russian Empires had vanished and the United States, which joined the war late on the side of the Triple Entente had become a world player. The old world order was gone!

Woodrow Wilson, the American President, sought to create a new old world order by proposing his Fourteen Points. Wilson wanted to create separate nations out of former colonies and ensure the peace by creating a League of Nations (another peace by treaty scheme). Territorial reductions were made to Germany and Austria, a slew of new and revived nations were created in Eastern Europe, while France and Britain carved up the Ottoman Empire to suit themselves. The new old world order was just a reconfigured old world order. It didn’t last and it didn’t ensure the peace. So much for the best laid plans of diplomats.

Germany was reborn in 1933 when Adolph Hitler became Chancellor. He, too, sought to create a new world order, one dominated by a Thousand Year Reich (Empire). To that end, his policies were aimed at seizing Lebensraum (living space) for the German people by extending Germany’s borders. Austria and parts of Czechoslovakia were annexed and Poland was invaded. But alas, Poland had a mutual defense treaty (another alliance formed to ensure the peach) with Great Britain and France, so the invasion of Poland started World War II.

When it was over, Germany again was destroyed and Great Britain and France, for the most part, had had their empires diminished. The United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (Russia) found themselves at the top of another new old world order.

The victorious powers, the US, the USSR, China, Great Britain, and France tried again to ensure the peace by creating the United Nations which they attempted to keep firmly in their control by making themselves rulers of the Security Council which had a veto on all UN Activities all five nations didn’t give unanimous approval to. That was to be the new old world order. But it began to come unglued immediately. China was not represented by mainland China which had become Communist but by “Nationalist” China whose government had fled to Taiwan. Communist China soon took the Chinese seat and the two Communist nations formed a bloc while the remaining three Capitalist nations formed another. The United Nations became the Disunited Nations and has remained so to this day. This new old world order was stillborn.

Sometime after 1950 (because of secrecy, the exact date is unknown) the Bilderbergers, realizing that the old world ancient régime and all of these new old world orders were founded on nation states that kept going to war with each other, began an attempt to create a truly new world order. David Rockefeller writes,

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. . . . It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it”

If there were no nation states, no wars could erupt between them!

Some believe that these international bankers have succeeded in taking over the world, but it has never succeeded in abolishing nation states. In fact, there is some evidence that nation states may be disintegrating into smaller ones. Scotland is going to hold a referendum on withdrawing from England, Catalonia is talking about withdrawing from Spain, Czechoslovakia has broken up into the Czech and Slovak republics, there is talk again of secession in the US, and no one quite knows what is really happening in the Arab world. A new world order ruled by one government? Not hardly!

But things began to break down in the 1950s. Until then, wars were fought between armies supported by nation states, and their endings were foreseeable. A war ended when one army, either voluntarily or on command, surrendered. That era appears to have ended. Old world order warfare appears to have become passé.

When the second world war ended, the Korean Peninsula was partitioned into Northern and Southern sections occupied by the Russians and Americans respectively. Elections for unification were to be held in 1948 but were not; the Americans were unsure the result would favor the South. Open warfare broke out when North Korean forces invaded South Korea in June, 1950. Because the Soviet Union was boycotting the United Nations Security Council at the time, the United States and other countries passed a Security Council resolution authorizing military intervention. The war’s progress favored each side from time to time and continued until July, 1953 when an armistice was signed. Officially, the war still goes on today. The US provided 88% of the 341,000 international soldiers which aided South Korea. The Russians and the People’s Republic of China aided North Korea. The West’s army was international, and the era of never ending, wars may have begun.

After a short pause, the American hubris led the US to play one-upmanship with France. Since the end of World War II, the French had been trying to maintain its hold on its Southeastern Asian colony of Vietnam. But at the Battle of Dien Bien Phu, the French were soundly defeated and decided to give up the fight. American hubris about its military prowess made American diplomats believe that the US could do what the French could not and began to use American military resources to keep South Vietnam from being united with the North.

The Pentagon’s military minds viewed this conflict as a traditional two-nation-state one and believed that America’s military only had to defeat a primitive North Vietnamese army to succeed. They were wrong, and after twenty years of fighting, 58,000 Americans, millions of Vietnamese had died, and the Americans fled. But this war marked another first: the army that won all the battles lost the war. That had never before happened in history. Today, winning battles does not win wars. Truly a new era in warfare has begun. What the Pentagon’s commanders failed to realize was that the war was not a two state war. It was a war between an invading army and an indigenous people who could only be defeated by total annihilation. No possible way existed for Americans (or any other nation-state) to “win” this war.

But Americans are hard learners and they learned nothing from Korea and Vietnam, so after two misadventures that appeared to be successful (Grenada and the 1st Gulf War), the US led another multinational force into Iraq and Afghanistan. After eight years in Iraq and the installation of a new government, the US withdrew without achieving its goals, leaving Iraq in disarray. And after more than a decade in Afghanistan a similar outcome seems to be imminent. Like Vietnam, these wars too are not two-state wars.

They amount to invading armies battling indigenous peoples who themselves are not united and not under the control of any government, group, or commander. No surrendering army in either country will ever be found. But now there’s a new twist. The forces facing the invaders do not merely consist of local peoples. Those peoples are assisted by non-state but similarly minded multi-state actors. The people opposing the West in Afghanistan are the same groups opposing the West in Libya, Algeria, Syria, Yemen, Mali, Somalia, the Sudan, and elsewhere. People who have been subjugated and exploited by the West have begun an undeclared war on the West and westerners everywhere, and winning this war will require not their defeat but their annihilation. The West cannot do that without annihilating itself in the process.

The real new world order has emerged–the world’s downtrodden against the West and its puppet, surrogate colonial governments. These non-state but similarly minded actors will determine the course of future world history. There is now a new world order that the West cannot control, that military force cannot subdue, and that concessions cannot placate. Ancien régimes relied on military power to influence events. The true new world order renders military power effete. All it can now accomplish is kill for killing’s sake. Pure barbarity is what the promise of Western Civilization has been reduced to. What a wonderful world we have made! 

 

JPMorgan Chase

¿Pensarán así todos los banqueros de nuestros países? Por supuesto que si.  

JP Morgan’s Jamie Dimon says you don’t need to know how banking works

Jamie Dimon (current chairman, president and chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase) in Davos Switzerland today explaining why people don’t need to know what’s going on in the banking world. It’s too “complex.” Just know that their fee comes from managing this ball of financial confusion. And that’s all you need to know.

There, don’t you feel better? I mean it’s not like the world bailed out the whole banking system or anything. We should have faith. 

Jamie Dimon de JP Morgan dice que no necesitamos saber como funciona la banca

Jamie Dimon (actual presidente, director general y CEO de JPMorgan Chase) hoy en Davos Suiza explicando por qué la gente no necesita saber lo que pasa dentro del mundo de la banca. Es demasiado “complejo”. Sólo sepan que sus honorarios provienen del manejo de esta complicada confusión financiera. Y eso es todo lo que necesitamos saber.

Con esto ¿No se sienten mejor? Quiero decir que no es como que el mundo rescató el sistema bancario en su conjunto ni nada por el estilo. Debemos tener fe.

http://www.infowars.com/jamie-dimon-says-you-dont-need-to-know-how-banking-works-its-like-an-airliner-engine-too-complex-to-explain/