Busca en Nuestros Archivos

Busca en Nuestro Blog

Translate / Traducir

03 enero, 2020

Who #Murdered #England?

By Mike King

NY Times: ‘This Is All We Can Afford’: Shrinking Lives in the English Countryside
In Cumbria, a bucolic landscape masks growing poverty and isolation.

REBUTTAL BY

Poor Unjolly Old England. It wasn't all that long ago that this island seat of a vast global empire -- upon which "the sun never set" -- for all its heavy handedness and exploitation -- brought stability, civilization and progress to much of the Turd World. But today, the conquerer is now the conquered -- a pathetic captive province of the communistic European Union (3 & 1/2 bloody long years since the "Brexit" vote and still no escape!) mired in moral degeneracy, weighed down with crushing levels of debt; taxation and regulation: and, as a result, plagued with deepening poverty rates for many of its Aryan natives.

Of course, the article describes the deepening despair of the featured English townspeople as the result of "austerity" budget cuts put in place by England's "Conservative" Party. But a close reading between the lines of this sad story about the sad lives of the mostly older rural residents of the northwest county of Cumbria offers us a hint of the related true "root causes" ™ of the decline of Cumbria and greater England as a whole, namely, an aging population (due to decades of low birth rates) and no jobs -- the standard rotten social and economic fruits of Marxism / libtardism. 

 
Scenic Cumbria County, England -- no place for old or young men.

More and more, modern England, much like the rest of the dying West, is beginning to resemble the England of George Orwell's "Oceania" from his classic 1949 novel titled, "1984." Orwell's nightmarish vision of the future depicts a sick society in which the ruling elites acclimate the impoverished masses ("proles") to their wretched state by the deliberate promotion of immorality, alcoholism and unremitting propaganda. Orwell's spooky foresight was either one of great intuition -- or, perhaps, he knew the playbook in advance? At a time when the English were still famed for being "prim and proper" -- Orwell, in Part 1, Chapter 7, prophesied the following for how the "proles" of "Oceania" would be dumbed-down, demoralized and controlled.

"Left to themselves, like cattle turned loose upon the plains of Argentina, they (the proles) had reverted to a style of life that appeared to be natural to them, a sort of ancestral pattern... They were born, they grew up in the gutters... petty quarrels with neighbours, films, football, beer, and above all, gambling, filled up the horizon of their minds.

To keep them in control was not difficult. A few agents of the Thought Police moved always among them, ... marking down and eliminating the few individuals who were judged capable of becoming dangerous; but no attempt was made to indoctrinate them with the ideology of the Party. It was not desirable that the proles should have strong political feelings. All that was required of them was a primitive patriotism which could be appealed to whenever it was necessary.

And even when they became discontented, as they sometimes did, their discontent led nowhere, because being without general ideas, they could only focus it on petty specific grievances. The larger evils invariably escaped their notice. .... Even the civil police interfered with them very little. There was a vast amount of criminality in London, a whole world-within-a-world of thieves, bandits, prostitutes, drug-peddlers, and racketeers of every description; but since it all happened among the proles themselves, it was of no importance. In all questions of morals they were allowed to follow their ancestral code."

Mr. Orwell nailed it, didn't he? 



1. Football fanatics // 2. Slutty, slovenly, drunken, childless "ladettes" of England // 3. A nasty Globalist Party wench of a "Prime Minister" who cared more about "migrants" than impoverished Englishmen.

No analysis of the sorry state of Not-So-Great Britain is complete without again revisiting one of the main historical themes of TomatoBubble.com -- World War II, aka "The Bad War." You see, by being on the "winning" side of an expensive and bloody conflict imposed upon innocent Germany by the Jewish bankers and their worldwide henchmen (Churchill being foremost among them) -- Britain, by design, soon found itself broke and internationalized under the oppressive leftist yoke of a regionalized tyranny which later became the European Union.

Ironically, it was The Great One (that's Hitler for all you newbies & normies) who stood firmly in opposition to this Globalist scheme. And that is why, in spite of his repeated and sincere offers of peace, friendship and even a protective alliance with the UK, the traitors of Britain -- that drunken, closet homo-pedo-sexual swine Churchill first and foremost among them -- in service to the true masters (cough cough), drove the British Empire into war, bankruptcy, dissolution and slavery.

Let's allow the great protagonists, The Great One and The British Mad Dog, to confirm this historical reality in their own respective words:

The Great One (1940):
"Yes, the German people used to live in a democracy, and had been plundered and squeezed dry. No, what does democracy or authoritarian state mean for these international hyenas? They’re not interested in either! They are interested in only one thing: Is anyone willing to let themselves be plundered, yes or no? Is anyone stupid enough to keep quiet in the process, yes or no? And when a democracy is stupid enough to keep quiet, then it is good! And when an authoritarian government declares: “You do not plunder our people any longer, neither from the inside or outside!” then that is bad."

The British Mad Dog (1949, same year as Orwell's book):

"We must recreate the European family in a regional structure called it may be the United States of Europe. ... If at first, all the states of Europe are not willing or able to join the union, we must nevertheless proceed assemble and combine those who will and those who can. .... "This indispensable structure of regional groupings is coming into being. ... In this way alone, can the skeletal structure of world government be clothed with the flesh and blood of a living organism and the acts of state be confirmed by the passionate heartbeats of millions of men."

Unfortunately, the "international hyenas," which The Great One warned about and fought against, ultimately prevailed in that horrible war -- and that, dear reader, is why the people of Cumbria County, England are suffering today. And it is also why "The Bad War" (by yours truly) and The British Mad Dog (also by yours truly) were both banned by Amazon after several years of strong sales.

During World War II, the great American ex-pat poet and "traitor," Ezra Pound, then based in Italy, issued a warning the British:


“Your enemy is not Germany, your enemy is money on loan. Your infamy is bound up with Judaea. You can not touch a sore or a shame in your empire but you find a Mond, a Sassoon, or a Goldsmid. No Sassoon is an Englishman, racially. No Rothschild is English, no Strakosch is English, no Roosevelt is English, no Morgenthau, Cohen, Lehman, Warburg, Kuhn, Khan, Baruch, Schiff, Sieff or Solomon was ever yet born Anglo-Saxon. And it is for this filth that you fight. It is for this filth that you have murdered your empire."

After the war, the American government kept Pound in a mental institution for 12 years.

*

Both banned by Amazon, but still available at TomatoBubble
Paperback versions: -- HERE 
Pdf versions below 

Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today about how -- because of Conservative Party budget cuts -- things are getting really bad in some areas of England
Boobus Americanus 2: Conservatives --- bad.


*

St. Sugar: Editor: The frickin' commiess and their libtard dupess always blame their own failures on "conservativess."Editor: In Europe, "conservatives" are actually junior Marxists. It's all part of the show put on for the "proles."

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario