.jpg)
Seven girls die and 230 suffer in a disputed program;
In the years 2009-10 a HPV vaccine project was implemented in Khammam district of Andhra Pradesh and Vadodara district of Gujarat, and other tribal regions, that injected 3 doses of the vaccines given in a six month period to around 24,000 tribal girls in the 10 to 13 year old age group with two HPV vaccines; 4-valent Gardasil by Merck (USA) and bivalent Cervarix by GSK (UK) who had provided the vaccines for free. The girls were vaccinated in schools, government residential hostels, and in remote tribal regions. The project, deceptively termed a demonstration project, funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) was implemented by PATH (USA), with the involvement of key Indian institutions ICMR, Department of Biotechnology, and the State Governments of Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat.
By the year 2010 the local media in Andhra Pradesh started reporting that deaths had occurred among the vaccine recipients and that families were burdened with girls that had suffered adverse effects. Alerted by the reports Dr Rukmini Rao of SAMA, a NGO dealing with women's health, Dr Mira Shiva, Dr Gagandeep Kang, representatives of the All India Drug Action Network (AIDAN), and the Jana Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) rushed to the area.
They came to know about the death of seven girls (two more deaths were discovered later but never considered) and could trace 200 to 230 girls that suffered from adverse effects. Notable among the adverse effects were allergies, neurological disorders, gastrointestinal issues, musculoskeletal problems, and menstrual problems like irregular periods, delayed menstrual cycles, and increased menstrual pain. The reports of the deaths of seven girls were inspected and the visiting teams noticed that there were irregularities like lack of adequate information and post mortem reports and yet ascribed to suicides, malaria, snake bite, drowning and seizure disorder. The media also reported that the families refused to accept the death diagnoses and insisted that the girls were healthy before vaccination and the deaths, post vaccination, were related to adverse effects they suffered.
As a very large population was vaccinated, the girls monitored, and data on safety and outcomes was being collected, the investigating civil society teams were of the opinion that an illegal clinical trial had been conducted without obtaining full clinical trial regulatory approval. The approval of the project was done in 2007, a year before HPV vaccines were licensed for use in India in 2008. Informed consent was not obtained as neither the girls nor their parents had understood the program. However these serious accusations were brushed away, just as the deaths were ruled to be unrelated to the vaccine by the adverse effect reporting system. This led to the realization that the international agencies involved were too powerful to be held accountable.
Indian Parliamentary Committee Files its Report;
Alerted by the hue and cry the Government of India suspended the program in 2010 and formed a Parliamentary Committee on Health and Family Welfare that submitted the 72nd Parliamentary Committee Report titled "Seventy Second Report on Alleged Irregularities in the Conduct of Studies using Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Vaccine by PATH in India" that was presented to Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha on 30th August 2013. The MP's of the Parliament expressed shock at the Report findings that "Children had been treated as guinea pigs". There were demands to protect tribal populations from medical research and concerns were expressed that foreign funded health projects were influencing India's public health policy. The MP's also criticized the regulatory lapses and were shocked by the lack of proper informed consent. The Report flayed the involvement of vaccine manufacturers that pointed towards the prospect of commercial gain.
Serious Irregularities Flagged by the Parliamentary Committee;
The 72nd Parliamentary Committee Report found that the allegations raised by the doctors and activists who first reported them, were majorly justifiable and that serious ethical and regulatory violations had occurred. The Report expressed surprise that a demonstration project involved vaccinating girls and tracking the outcomes and yet was categorized within existing regulatory frameworks. There were inconsistencies in the informed consent procedure with wardens signing the often incomplete forms instead of parents. There were inconsistencies in records; variations in reporting procedures and limited documentation in adverse effect reports. Follow up of the adverse effects were not fully documented. The institutions involved lacked coordination. There should have been greater clarity and oversight in regulatory and ethical approvals. The Committee noted that communication about the purpose and procedures of the program were not fully documented. The Report seriously criticized the agencies involved and also the existing deficient regulatory and ethical rules and regulations.
It should be noted that no action was ever taken on the agencies involved; international or national. There were a few internal review meetings and it ended with that. The powerful escaped without any punitive action.
The Supreme Court Case Still Lingers;
A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed in the Supreme Court of India on 7th January 2013 by Kalpana Mehta, Nalini Bhanot, and V. Rukmini Rao to hold PATH, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), and state governments accountable for violating ethical standards during the 2009 HPV vaccine "demonstration project" on over 24,000 girls in Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat and demanded for compensation. The case still drags, much to the dissatisfaction of the litigants, with the defendants initially refusing to admit the 72nd Parliamentary Committee Report as evidence, and the tone of the case has shifted from justice, accountability, and compensation/ protection, to strengthening the ethical and regulatory framework that is being touted as a success. The litigants have indicated they may not be able to carry on much further.
Can we Trust the System Again?
The lengthy narration above should set the tone for the rest of the discussion. The combined effort of the Government of India, a Parliamentary Committee on Health and Family Welfare, and powerful and technically qualified civil society organization members, aside from public and media protests failed to punish the guilty and protect the interests of those harmed despite recorded deaths and widespread adverse effects. Despite a lull, the HPV programs continued again with the State of Sikkim launching a full-fledged campaign in July 2018 and other States following suit.
On the 28th Of February 2026 the Government of India, that was so far unwilling to massively push the vaccine citing concern about adverse effects among others, has launched a nationwide program to vaccinate 2.3 crore 14 year old girls in two years with a one dose regime of Gardasil the 4-valent HPV vaccine produced by Merck that was at the root of the controversy in 2009-10. Interestingly this followed after a promise made to Bill Gates by the Indian Prime Minister on 29th March 2024 in New Delhi. Bill Gates referred to India as a "kind of laboratory to try things" during a podcast interview with LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, which gained significant attention and caused controversy in early December 2024. Experts are urging the activists to forget the 2009 scandal and participate wholeheartedly in making the program a success. Success for whom?
The Ominous Shadow of Bill Gates;
The shadow of Bill Gates in this program is obvious and ominous. In the recent Epstein file disclosures Bill Gates was found discussing a pandemic funding infrastructure with Jeffrey Epstein since 2011 that proceeded towards a detailed planning of the Covid program and statements like "can we pull it (the scam) off" in the revealed correspondence has alarmed the world. The duo also discussed eliminating the poor. While the BJP led Government of India terminated BMGF support to the public Health Foundation of India (PHFI) in 2017 and acted to reduce the influence of foreign donors on policy-making and addressed potential conflicts of interest, there was a turnaround with Bill Gates claiming in 2020 that he supervised the Covid response in India on daily basis and now he seems to be fully in charge of India's health policy. Can we allow this Epstein tainted personality to take health decisions influencing the health of women and girls of child bearing age in this country? Who decides, the people or entrenched interests?
It is not enough for this issue to remain within medical circles. The civil society organizations and groups, cutting across thematic areas and political affiliations must come together to confront the lobbyists, inform parents and protect the girls. The program, now limited to a single dose, and termed voluntary seems to be a ruse to gain acceptability. The manufacturer still recommends three doses and the health workers reveal that targets have been set; questioning the voluntary nature. They also hint at a future door to door campaign so that no child is left behind. Vaccinating adolescents and teenagers, who are in their formative years and undergoing hormonal changes, has always been termed risky and scandals involving medical interventions in vulnerable populations are too numerous to be ignored.
What is HPV? Is it Really So Deadly?
The Human Papilloma virus (HPV) is claimed to be behind 95% of cervical cancers that occur 20 to 30 years post infection. It is also claimed that cervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women in India, with approximately 123,907-127,526 new cases and 67,500-79,906 deaths annually. The vaccination is supposed to prevent 95% of the deaths.
How valid are these claims that are being advertised by lobbyists in all channels? The public is not being informed about the underlying facts. HPV infections rarely proceed to cervical cancer. 90% of them clear off on their own. The rest 10% can proceed to Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) that is a pre-cancerous condition caused by high-risk HPV, characterized by abnormal cell growth on the surface of the cervix, usually asymptomatic but detectable through pap smears. It is graded as CIN 1 (mild), CIN 2 (moderate), or CIN 3 (severe), with higher grades having a greater risk of progressing to invasive cancer. The HPV vaccine claims to prevent pre-cancerous lesions and not cervical cancer! The cancer prevention claim itself is dubious.
Even at the CIN stage the infection tends to fizzle out. 99% of those who are in CIN 1 stage are not at risk, 95% of those having CIN 2 are not at risk, and only 12% of those having CIN stage 3 are at risk! Moreover a three decade long study 1990-2019 (Singh M et al, BMC Cancer 2022, Feb 7) has shown that both cervical cancer incidence and mortality in India are declining rapidly. While incidence has declined > 21%, mortality has declined >32%. This decline is continuing and is ascribed to changes in sexual behavior, safe sex, better menstrual hygiene, stopping child marriages, and regular pap smear tests that detect HPV infection and warn the subject to undergo lifestyle and other changes. This decline is continuing and will be attributed to the HPV vaccine campaign in coming years. The public should understand how they are being taken for a ride.
Does HPV Really Cause Cancer?
What are the underlying factors that lead to cervical cancer? This is very interesting. The causal factors are sex work, having multiple sexual partners, a depleted immune system due to AIDS or chemotherapy, long term use of oral hormonal contraceptives/ morning after pills, teenage sex and pregnancy, child marriage, lack of menstrual hygiene etc. 54% of those who progress to cervical cancer suffer from AIDS or cancer. Sex workers practicing unprotected sex are most at risk. Thus preventing cervical cancer involves undergoing lifestyle changes. HPV infection seems secondary. Also there are 5% of cases that are observed without any HPV infection. What is strange is that the outcomes of these cancers are more alarming. This begs the question; is the HPV infection protecting subjects in any way?
HPV was earlier associated with genital warts and the association with cervical cancer was concluded by the award of a Noble Prize to the German Virologist Harald zur Hausen in 2008. His work and the award of the Noble Prize, we are told, sealed the debate and placed the whole emphasis on HPV vaccines as the only preventive tool. However the Noble Prize came under a cloud when it was revealed that a Nobel Assembly member had ties to AstraZeneca, a company that held patents on HPV vaccines and sponsored Nobel Media, leading to a Swedish police anticorruption inquiry. Bo Angelin, a member of the Nobel Assembly at the Karolinska Institutet, sat on the board of AstraZeneca, which held patent rights to HPV vaccines (Gardasil). AstraZeneca had also established a partnership with Nobel Media and Nobel Web to sponsor events and documentaries around the time of the prize, creating concerns about undue influence. Despite the controversy, no charges were filed. The Nobel committee stated that Angelin was not involved in the vaccine patent decisions. Everything thus comes under a cloud. Establishing a viral connection to cancers opens the door for vaccines and the resultant revenue.
There is more. A paper published by McCormack et al in Molecular Cytogenetics, "Individual karyotypes at the origins of cervical carcinomas" presents findings that negate the HPV = Cancer hypothesis and proves that a vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV) is extremely unlikely to protect against cervical cancer. According to this paper neither genetic predisposition nor HPV infections are necessary for the development of cervical cancer. All cervical cancer cells investigated during the course of this study contained new abnormal karyotypes. The clonality (genetic makeup) of these new abnormal karyotypes indicates the cervical cancers originated with these karyotypes - NOT from a virus. Karyotypes are a set of chromosomes.
These controversies and studies indicate that pharmaceutical interests and manipulations are behind the whole campaign.
The Dangers of the Vaccine;
There are many concerns regarding the Gardasil vaccine adverse effects that have created ripples worldwide. Prof Dr Amitav Bannerjee, MD speaking in a medical webinar has pointed out that deaths from cervical cancer are 9.2 per 100,000 women. In contrast the Indian experience in 2009 showed 7 deaths in 24000 girls (though hotly contested, two more deaths were not considered). Thus he suggests that India's health policy should not be dictated by the vaccine approach. Pap smears and counselling remain the best options, he says.
In terms of adverse effects the HPV vaccine trials have reflected up to 2.3% serious adverse effects. In the Indian comparative trial (Sharma H et al, Lancet Oncology, 2023, Dec 24) of the Serum Institute developed Cervavac and Gardasil showed a 1% serious adverse effects in both the groups. Is 1 to 2.3 serious events per 100 an acceptable solution considering the low incidence and falling mortality of cervical cancer observed worldwide, including India? These impacts, we should note, are on young girls brimming of life and who are the future of the country. Dr Bannerjee mentions there are more than 150 strains of HPV of which a few are said to infect. After the introduction of the vaccine a new strain; strain 58, has emerged requiring another vaccine Gardasil 9 to include it. This is known as strain shift and is known to occur after vaccination. Thus vaccination for viral diseases are known to be problematic.
The vaccines have led to deaths, hospitalizations, and permanent crippling diseases and disabilities (POI, POTS, CRPS) leading to protests in Japan (where it was temporarily halted after a Court verdict in 2013), USA, Australia, UK, Sweden, and Columbia. In countries where adverse effects are recorded HPV vaccine adverse effects are number one in incidence, far exceeding adverse effects reported from other vaccines.
A 30 minute documentary "Sacrificial Virgins" produced in the UK narrates the plight of the affected girls and women, and recorded how doctors were being warned against autopsy reports blaming the HPV vaccine for deaths. In the documentary Dr Peter Duesberg (UC Berkeley) says HPV found in tumors may be only a "passenger virus," not the cause of cancer. He claims the viral fragments detected in cancer cells are "fossils of HPV" from earlier infections rather than active causes of cancer. Dr Christian Fiala, Specialist in Obstetrics and Gynecology says, "No-one has shown that the HPV vaccine actually reduces the rate of cervical cancer." Because cervical cancer develops decades after infection, it will take many years before such proof exists. It is funny that the vaccines are expected to halt cancer occurring 20 to 30 year hence while manufacturers claim efficacy for 6 to 14 years! Can we believe in unsubstantiated projections!
The HPV vaccines contain an aluminum adjuvant (AAHS). Controversy surrounds the use of aluminum-based adjuvants in vaccines, particularly regarding their potential role in long-term, chronic, and autoimmune conditions. Christopher Exley a British bioinorganic chemist known for his extensive research on the biological effects of aluminum, criticizes the use of new aluminium adjuvants in HPV vaccines that have not been widely used before. Studies have suggested a link between aluminum adjuvants, Gulf War Illness (GWI), and other conditions, suggesting they may cause immune system dysfunction in genetically susceptible individuals.
There is also concern about DNA contamination and the use of Virus Like Particles (VLP) in the HPV vaccines that explain the peculiar adverse effects noted. While fainting after the HPV vaccine (widely noticed in India) is shrugged off as a minor side effect, experts hypothesize this "fainting" and the sudden drop in blood pressure noticed is due to an acute allergy-related response to the yeast associated components in the vaccine, which result in a massive histamine release from eosinophils and mast cells. This elevated histamine quickly dilated blood vessels, and appears to be the cause for the drop in blood pressure.
That the vaccine is causing a wide range of adverse effects can be checked by going through the CDC vaccine adverse effect reporting system and WHO Vigiaccess; post marketing safety database. Maintaining a silence on these adverse effects points towards collusion and complete disregard towards those vaccinated, injured and crying for help.
Why the Concerns Surrounding Infertility?
The HPV vaccine package inserts boldly state that the vaccines have not been tested on humans for their capacity to cause infertility, while declaring that it does not cause infertility in humans! Thus the attack against those who claim that the vaccine is intended to add to the infertility crisis is not justified. The presence of ingredients in the vaccines like AAHS, L-Hystidine, Sodium Borate, and Polysorbate 80 besides the fact that medicating/ vaccinating girls and boys at a sensitive rapidly growing age can affect the developing reproductive system should alarm anyone.
The vaccine adverse effects recorded include widespread menstrual irregularities and premature ovarian insufficiency. Primary Ovarian Insufficiency (POI), is a rare, severe condition involving the loss of ovarian function before age 40, characterized by amenorrhea, low estrogen, and infertility. Studies of US VAERS data between 1990 and 2018 identified 281 POF reports suspected of being associated with HPV vaccines, with a median patient age of 15. (Tatang, C., Arredondo Bisonó, T., Bergamasco, A. et al. Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Premature Ovarian Failure: A Disproportionality Analysis Using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Drugs - Real World Outcomes 9, 79-90 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-021-00271-6 ). Regarding uterine impact while most reports focused on ovarian dysfunction, some cases included findings of a "heterogeneous uterus" in pelvic sonograms.
Indian's have their own reasons to worry. The first birth control vaccine called the Talwar Vaccine after its inventor Dr Gursharan Talwar, has been developed in India. It is in the form of a tetanus vaccine as tetanus toxoid (TT) and diphtheria toxoid (DT) are considered highly effective carriers for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the development of anti-fertility vaccines. It works by inducing antibodies against Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG), a hormone crucial for maintaining pregnancy. This vaccine was administered in African nations, and 58 priority countries, by the WHO, Unicef and UNFPA on women of child bearing age (15 to 49 years). The Bishops of Kenya tested the vaccines in laboratories of Africa and India and found hCG in them. While the WHO denied the allegations, the laboratories did not lie.
What is alarming is that India has on 21st February 2026 launched an indigenous tetanus diphtheria vaccine and the campaign has a special provision for women of child bearing age (14 to 49 years). We should be wary of such drives. Our girls and women deserve protection from forces that have ulterior motives of their own. India is perceived as an overpopulated country, and those speaking of overpopulation in international platforms are recommending vaccines for "protecting lives".
Conclusion: What Lessons Did We Learn From Covid?
The whole world was deceived into accepting multiple doses of an injection that experts say was not a vaccine. Even the CDC changed its definition of vaccines after it was launched. Bill Gates, once again, had taken the lead stating that the vaccine would prevent infection, transmission, severe disease, and death. All the claims were proven to be false. Five billion people were vaccinated worldwide. Cases of heart attacks, brain strokes, and sudden deaths escalated and still continue. As per large international studies 7 to 15 million died, 29 - 60 million are permanently disabled, and 500 - 900 million are seriously injured. Dr Mark Trozzi, MD, while delivering these statistics warns of further disease campaigns aiming to vaccinate populations. In India the Supreme Court has directed the Centre to have a tax payer funded compensation program for those few who can prove that the Covid vaccines were responsible for their woes. This is a near impossible ask. The perpetrators of the crime stay scot free.
The public should not be fooled again. We should not endanger the health of our 14 year old girls and of other age groups into which this vaccine will steadily and surely intrude, based on the statements of a person who has publicly apologized for his sexual misadventures as revealed by the Epstein files. His own wife has abandoned him. He does not have moral authority or medical expertise to dictate what is injected into our women and children.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario