NY Times: Russian Groups Crowdfund the War in Ukraine
By JO BECKER and STEVEN LEE MYERS
Several groups are running online campaigns to brazenly raise money for rebels in eastern Ukraine, helping succor a conflict that has killed thousands.
REBUTTAL BY
THE ANTI-NEW YORK TIMES
The breathless tone of this self-proclaimed, self-important piece of "investigative journalism" is designed to excite the gullible readers who kneel in Sulzberger's seditious cesspool each day. Note the drama:
"An examination by The New York Times of the groups’ websites, social media postings and other records found more than a dozen groups in Russia that are raising money for the separatists..."
Ooooh. Imagine that. The Slimes' sleuths have discovered that private citizens in Russia are sending donations to their besieged brothers in Donbass (eastern Ukraine). Wow! Who would have ever imagined such a thing? Give those Slimes reporters a Pulitzer Prize!
"....aiding a conflict that has killed more than 6,400 people and plunged Russia’s relations with the West to depths not seen since the Cold War."
Liars! It wasn't "the conflict" that "plunged Russia's relations with the West to depths not seen since the Cold War". It was the New World Order's violent overthrow of the elected government in Kiev that so angered the Russian Crimeans and Russian-speaking east Ukrainians. More than ninety percent of the people in Donbass voted for President Yanukovich; the guy who was forced to flee Kiev for his life.
Just days after Yanukovich fled, Washington's new vassal-gansters in charge decreed an end to the policy of recognizing Russian one of the official languages of eastern Ukraine. Those are among the justifable reasons why Donbass rebelled. Putin's Russia had nothing to do with it!
1- December, 2013: US Senator John 'Insane' McCain incites the Kiev mob to overthrow the duly-elected government
2- Under-Secretary of State Vicky Nuland poses with her hand-picked puppets - the so-called "opposition"
Continued:
"The groups have relied on social media — including YouTube and the Russian version of Facebook — to direct donations through state-owned banks in Russia and through a private system of payment terminals owned by a company called QIWI that is affiliated with Visa and traded on the Nasdaq."
We see the real game here. The Slimes is trying to "shame" You Tube and Visa into cutting off Russian videos and donations to Donbass.
"These organizations are part of an online campaign that is brazenly raising money for the war in eastern Ukraine."
"Brazenly"? Why such a loaded word? From Websters Dictionary:
Brazen: acting or done in a very open and shocking way without shame or embarrassment.
What would donors to east Ukrainian groups have to be "ashamed" of to begin with? What is so "shocking" or "embarrassing" about helping your oppressed Russian brothers? Speaking of "brazen", let us not forget that the U.S. government "brazenly" poured 5 Billion of our tax dollars into Ukraine for the purpose of "promoting democracy" (buying puppets). Vicki Nuland (Nudelman) Kagan "brazenly" admitted as such. By the way, this wretched wench is the wife of Robert Kagan; a high ranking Zionist neo-con who, in 1999, joined other neo-cons in "brazenly" stating that a "new Pearl Harbor" (here) was needed to kick-start the U.S. war machine.
More recently, the broke U.S. has been "brazenly" giving taxpayer money to its terrorist thug-puppet Porky Poroshenko in Kiev, while "brazenly" positioning troops and missile bases in eastern Europe.
At a Chevron event, neo-con Nuland-Kagan "brazenly" admitted:
"Since Ukraine’s independence in 1991, the United States has supported Ukrainians as they build democratic skills and institutions, as they promote civic participation and good governance, all of which are preconditions for Ukraine to achieve its European aspirations. We’ve invested over $5 billion to assist Ukraine in these and other goals that will ensure a secure and prosperous and democratic Ukraine."
More:
"The network features a disparate yet overlapping cast of characters that includes a mustachioed former Russian military intelligence officer credited with starting the uprising, Igor Girkin, who uses the nom de guerre Igor Strelkov".
Double wow! One of the "cast of characters" from this aid "network" has a mustache, and a code name of "Igor" - just like the notorious sidekicks who assisted Dr. Frankenstein and Count Dracula!
A "mustachioed" ex-spook code-named "Igor" is said to be running this operation. Be afraid, America. Be very afraid!
More:
"On April 20, a group called Batman noted on its social media page that all but its Sberbank account had been blocked. But by May 18, it had updated the page to include a new QIWI account number and a plea: “Donbass needs your help!”
Now Batman is hooked up with the Rooskies too?!
Holy Russian Rubles Batman!
Your historical researcher here at The Anti-New York Times has spent many hours analyzing the pre-World War II propaganda found in old issues of Sulzberger's Slimes. It is most interesting to observe that the distortions of 1936-1939 were nowhere near as ridiculous as what Sulzberger's spoiled-rotten grandkids are pumping out today. Indeed, some of those old articles are remarkably objective and even useful, all things considered.
Back then, the pre-war spin was subtle, almost undetectable at times. Evidently, today's swallowers of Sulzbergerian slime are so dumbed-down that subtlety is no longer needed. There is nothing subtle, at all, about so many of today's anti-Russia and anti-China hit-pieces. To the contrary, propaganda poop-pies such as this article are, well, a bit "brazen", and actually a bit funny too.
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in The New York Times today that people in Russia are brazenly funneling terror money through a spooky separatist with a mustache. And, get this, his name is Igor!
Boobus Americanus 2: Igor? Wow. That's very intriguing. It almost sounds like a Hollywood movie script.
"It isss a movie script, dumbasss!"
