Ty Bollinger: Talk a little bit about homeopathy. I know you’re a homeopath.
Dr. Keith Scott-Mumby:
Indeed, and I’m on a homeopathic advisory board back in Europe. The
only thing is I can’t talk a “little bit” about homopathy. I can run out
the camera batteries…
Ty Bollinger: I’m sure you could.
Dr. Keith Scott-Mumby:
No, seriously, I’ll try hack it down. Okay, first of all it’s important
to understand the model because a lot of people have probably heard the
word and they’re probably seeing all the scoffing and derision, and
there’s nothing in it. You know we proved there are no chemicals in it,
therefore it’s a fraud and think well it must be a fraud when, in fact,
it’s one of the
most healing, restorative modalities I know.
The thing is it’s not based on the amount of stuff. It’s based on an energetic signal; an information signal,
if you like. So this is homeopathy in two or three sentences. You pick a
substance that copies the illness. Not one that opposes it, but one
that copies it. For example, if someone has scarlet fever you chose
belladonna, because if you take belladonna your face goes all bright red
and your throat’s sore, hectic temperature, you feel ghastly. Taking
belladonna is like having scarlet fever, so it’s a good remedy for
scarlet fever.
It’s called “like cures like.” So you’re looking for a mimic of the disease. A conventional doctor would take an antagonist, so you take your aspirin to lower temperature. Different kinds of opposing ideas.
This
is, first of all, identify something that copies your illness. Then you
dilute it. Now this is the weird part that doctors and scientists can’t
get a hold of. It’s called potentization. And you can dilute it one in
ten, one in ten, one in ten, one in ten, one in ten. And after 12
dilutions you’ve passed the Avogadro number so we know there is no
belladonna left.
Well, interestingly, if you hitch it up to a spectrographic transmitter you find that the more you dilute it the more it starts transmitting energies.
And now you can’t argue with a spectrograph. It’s the most exquisitely
sensitive scientific instrument we have. That’s what tells you there’s
manganese on a star that’s a thousand billion light years away. You
can’t argue with a spectrograph. And yet the homeopathic remedies
actually start to broadcast the more you dilute them.
There’s
another series that goes a hundred by a hundred, by a hundred, by a
hundred. That’s called a C series. So you’ve got the D or ten series, or
the C/100 series. So get rid of any concern that you’ve removed the
substance. That’s true, you have. But, of course, what’s happened is
that you’ve imprinted the signal in each dilution and it gets
re-imprinted on the water.
That’s the third point of homeopathy.
It’s “like cures like,” then the dilutions, and then what we call
“succussion.” In making the dilutions the homeopath will bang it on his
hand like that a few times. Then do the next dilution into plain water,
bang it on his hand. That’s called succussion and it enhances the
transmission of the signal from each substance.
And although you’ll read all over the place that homeopathy has been proven not to work… First of all, you can’t prove anything doesn’t work. You can only fail to prove it does work. There are a thousand studies showing it’s highly effective. In fact there’s a very good one that was published in The Lancet in 1994. They did it three times because they couldn’t believe it was working. Three times it performed better than placebo.
Want to be notified when other awesome interviews or articles are added? Click here for our free weekly digest. You’ll be glad you did.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario