Perfectly
Played
HISTORICAL FLASHBACK
JANUARY 29, 1913
How the Rothschild Fortune of $2,000,000,000 Was
Made
Rebuttal by ANTI-NEW YORK TIMES
Whilst wading through the cesspool that is the invaluable archive of very old issues of The New York Slimes -- through its "Times Machine" feature which your generous reader support helps to pay for (hint, hint) -- your roving reporter here, guided by the powerful scent and immortal spirit of the late great St. Sugar the Conspiracy Cat, chanced upon this STUNNING full-page illustrated article about the mighty Rothschilds.
It's not "stunning" for its revelations (which we "antisemitic" ™ "conspiracy theorists" ™ were already well acquainted with) -- but rather, for the fact that such a spread actually appeared in the Jewish-owned (since 1896) "paper of record." Evidently, during those pre-"politically correct" / pre-"woke" days of the early 20th Century, even Arthur Ochs (maternal-side patriarch of the Sulzberger Dynasty) could not completely censor the "goy" journalists of his staff.
This one is a
real gem which should prove highly useful in approaching the normies in our
midst who automatically slip into full reactionary retard mode the moment they
hear the name "Rothschild." A piece like this -- coming from the
oh-so-prestigious and Jewish-owned "paper of record"-- will go a
long, long way in opening up minds to the reality of this foul generational
crime syndicate. Excerpts and analysis of this article to follow.
Link to full pdf of
1913 article
NY Times (1913): A passion for old coins and skill as a chess player formed the basis for the most colossal fortune ever conceived or recorded among the factsof history.
Analysis: "The most colossal fortune ever conceived or recorded." -- Ya hear dat, normie?
NY Times: So writes Ignatius Balla in "The Romance of the Rothschilds," a book which the great bankers whose name adorns its title-page are endeavoring to suppress in England...
Analysis: So, not only was the wealth of the Rothschilds the "most colossal ever recorded" -- the clan apparently had enough influence to "endeavor to suppress" books written about them in England.
NY Times: ... and which shortly will be published in this country by G.P. Putnam's Sons.
Analysis: In 1913, the major U.S. publishers were owned by White Gentiles. Such a book could NEVER be published by any of the majors today.
NY Times: How the Rothschilds amassed their fortune, how for a century they wielded an irresistible power in the affairs of Europe, and have more than once shaped the destiny of nations, has before now occupied the attention of both historian and journalist.
Analysis: Aw come on now, NY Times! Not that old "canard" ™ about the Rothschilds "wielding irresistible power" and "shaping the destiny of nations." That's been "debunked" ™ and "fact-checked" a million times, donctha' know?
NY Times: But the Rothschild secret has been hard to pierce.
Analysis: A "secret," eh? You mean, like a "conspiracy theory" ™, right? Right? Shame on The Times!
NY Times: Maier Amschel became a clerk in a banking house and before his death this "obscure child of the Frankfurt ghetto" had founded the House of Rothschild, whose fortune today is estimated at $2,000,000,000.
Analysis: According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, $2 Billion in 1913 would be the equivalent of $64 Billion today. However, the Bureau uses a ridiculously underestimated average annual rate of compounding inflation of 3.1%. We estimate -- based on 1913 Gold at $20 per ounce vs 2025 Gold at $3000 per ounce (artificially suppressed) -- that those 1913 dollars would actually be worth about 500 Billion dollars today. And when you factor in "paper market" suppression of Gold and Silver PLUS the appreciation of theirhard assets and equities -- we're talking about an extended family fortune in the Trillions.
NY Times: Neither Rockefeller, nor Carnegie nor Astor, nor any other transatlantic prince of finance has a capital equal to the Rothschilds. It increases daily. It would be bound to increase even if they never engaged in another transaction. As invested in interest of not more than 4%, their capital would yield more than $80,000,000 yearly (1913 dollars).
Analysis: Oh the "anti-Semitism" ™ of it all! Make it stop! In the "paper of record" of all places! Now mind you, the privately owned Federal Reserve System had not even been established yet. That came in December of that same year, 1913. So, just imagine how their money-machine got supercharged after that event. Maybe 10T? ... 15T? ... 20T of hidden net worth? And yet, none of these Satanic sons of bitches appear on any lists of the world's richest.
Parasitic filth
-- spawned exponentially across Europe from the five banker sons of loan shark
Maier Amschel Rothschild.
NY Times: Frankfurt, Vienna, Naples, London and Paris were the five cities in which the sons of Maier Amschel were originally stationed.
Analysis: The famous "five sons" branching out all across Europe. Not that "antisemitic canard" again! This sounds a lot like what yours truly wrote in Planet Rothschild -- which was banned from Amazon. Maybe it's time to ban the New York Times archives as well?
NY Times: It should be added, also, that the "House of Rothschild" is far richer and more prosperous today than ever before in its remarkable history.
Analysis: Ha ha ha ha. Very funny NY Times. Yeah, right, sure. Next The Times will be telling us that "da Jews" control the media, or academia, or Hollywood, or the music industry, or the porn business, or the art world, or Wall Street, or the World Economic Forum --- ha ha ha ha ha.
NY Times: The genius, shown by the founder of the London House, Nathan Rothschild...... It was Nathan who figured in the speculation on the result of the Battle of Waterloo, the story of which, as related in "The Romance of the Rothschilds," has aroused the anger of the British branch of the family, and which has been denounced as a falsehood.
Analysis: The story of how that no good dirty rat bastard Nathan Rothschild deliberately crashed the market in 1815 by spreading false rumors of a Napoleon victory at Waterloo (Belgium) -- and then, through his secret agents on the floor of the Exchange -- buying it up on-the-cheap evidently struck a raw nerve with the 1913 clan. According to the book review, Rothschild had advance knowledge because he was at Waterloo.The moment that Nathan Rothschild was satisfied that the much-hated Napoleon -- who was anti-money-lending and wanted to "Frenchify" the Jews out of their race cult -- would be defeated, he raced back to London in the fastest carriage and boat that money could buy and then pulled off the greatestdump & pump market heist in world history.
NY Times: Rothschild changed London from being merely the largest money center in Europe into the emporium of the markets of the world.
Analysis:
World financial domination, eh? Oy vey. The "paper of record" in
1913, in so hatefully dignifying this book, sounded exactly like The Protocols
of the Learned Elder of Zion! It's a good thing that the Anti-Defamation League
(ADL) was founded about eight months after this article appeared. Nothing
likeit has been published ever since.*What a find this item is. -- Thanks
Sulzberger! Please share this story far and wide.
The wretched
swine conquered both France and Britain within 24 hours!
FROM THE NEW
YORK TIMES! --- Image and excerpt above describe the scene in 1815 in which
sneaky blood-soaked Nathan (armed with early knowledge of Waterloo) ruined so
many others while buying upthe whole market that he had just secretly crashed.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario