500,000 "#CovidDeaths" -- 100% #FAKE!

 

It began with a single dot.

500,000 FAKE DEATHS!

FEBRUARY 23, 2021

NY Times: U.S. Virus Deaths Near 500,000

 

 

REBUTTAL BY

Oh the bloody front-page drama! 500,000 little dots to keep the dumb-as-dirt normies frightened and compliant. The Slimes ought to do a similar graphic for all of the innocent people killed in the never-ending wars which (((they))) have cheer-leaded for. Evidently, some "dots" matter more than others.

About 9 months ago, the “Editorial Board” of The Anti-New York Times warned its readership that because there is a constant fresh supply of dead bodies from various causes -- 2.9 million per year in the United States to be precise -- "deaths" attributed to phony “flares-ups,” ™ “second waves” ™ and "variants" ™ of Stupid-19 would be about as easy to conjure up as the opening or closing of a water spigot. Now, exactly one year into the great Globalist Scamdemic, the felonious faucet of fatality has pumped up the “national death toll” ™ to 500,000, and counting. How was this sickening sleight of hand achieved? The methods were surprisingly simple.

Before we review the magic tricks behind these fake numbers, let us note that even if one were to accept, purely for argument’s sake, this phony 500,000 number as absolute truth --- that in a nation of

UK to spend £650,000 providing Syrian rebel fighters with hoods that protect against chemical weapons

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/uk-to-spend-650000-providing-syrian-rebel-fighters-with-hoods-that-protect-against-chemical-weapons-8711036.html

Cost of the non-lethal assistance would be met from the Government's conflict pool fund.

William Hague said the so-called escape hoods would be sent to "moderate forces" within the opposition, along with tablets that combat the symptoms of nerve agents and a type of paper that can detect chemical weapons.

The Foreign Secretary said the hoods protected against Sarin attacks for up to 20 minutes, meaning those wearing are able to move away from an affected area but cannot continue to fight. The tablets also provide those under a chemical weapons attack enough time to get to a medical centre to receive atropine, the drug needed to overcome Sarin.

In a written ministerial statement to MPs, Mr Hague said the assistance would be offered to the Supreme Military Council and the Syrian National Coalition.

The £656,800 cost of the non-lethal assistance would be met from the Government's conflict pool fund.

Mr Hague said the Government needed to "gift" the Syrian opposition fighters the equipment without going through the proper parliamentary procedures because it was "a matter of special urgency" as there was evidence Syrian President Bashar Assad was using chemical weapons in the conflict.

He said: "We have to be prepared to do more to save lives. There is evidence of attacks using chemical weapons in Syria - including Sarin.

"We believe that the use of chemical weapons is sanctioned and ordered by the Assad regime."

Mr Hague added: "We plan to equip the moderate armed opposition with 5,000 escape hoods, nerve-agent pre-treatment tablets (NAPs) and chemical weapons detector paper.

"Escape hoods protect against Sarin gas for approximately 20 minutes, allowing a person to move away from an affected area but not enabling them to continue to fight.

"They do not require fitting or extensive training to be effective. Pre-treatment with NAPs gives a person who is exposed to a nerve agent (including Sarin) a greater chance of reaching a place where atropine can be administered under medical supervision.

"Chemical weapons detector paper enables the basic detection of chemical weapons agents. The capability to detect quickly whether chemical weapons agents are present will inform decisions on whether or not to remain in an area and so potentially save lives."

Last week, MPs passed a Commons motion calling on the Government to seek the "explicit" consent of Parliament before deciding to arm rebel fighters in Syria.

The motion - that "this House believes no lethal support should be provided to anti-government forces in Syria without the explicit prior consent of Parliament" - was passed by 114 votes to one.

It had been tabled by Tory MP John Baron and was also supported by a number of high profile MPs, including Labour former minister Peter Hain and Tory former leadership candidate David Davis.

The vote came after Foreign Secretary William Hague told MPs they would be given a say on a substantive motion, which could in theory bind the Government to the decision, before rebels in Syria received military support from the UK.But speaking after the G8 summit last month, Mr Cameron told the Commons there were certain circumstances where the Government reserved the right to intervene if it felt UK national interests were threatened

 

5 Proven Reasons to Stop Trusting the Government Right Now

Anthony Gucciardi

Infowars.com

From injecting citizens with plutonium just to see what happens to funneling your taxpayer dollars into mega banks that fund the illegal drug trade, here’s 5 openly admitted and proven reasons not to trust the United States government.

REASON 1: US GOVT PROGRAM SECRETLY INJECTED CITIZENS WITH PLUTONIUM

I write a lot about our disappearing civil liberties and the flagrant abuse of the Constitution by corrupt politicians, but the disturbing reality is that the crimes against the people at the hands of the United States government go much deeper. Coming from a long line of horrific human experimentation carried out by government heads, one of the most appalling acts centered around the injection of plutonium into unknowing citizens of the United States. Yes, the very people that politicians are supposed to ‘protect’.

What’s most nefarious, and I mean downright out of the pits of Satan, is that they carried out the injections on people who were seeking treatment in the hospital for broken bones and certain diseases. One example is a nuclear facility employee Ebb Cade, who went into the hospital with a broken arm and leg seeking treatment after he had some form of an accident. Doctors at the hospital, as instructed by the government, secretly injected the fifty-three-year-old man with 4.7 micrograms of plutonium on April 10th of 1945.

After injecting the innocent man who suffered from broken bones, they watched as Cade was blasted with extreme amounts of Plutonium. But that’s not all. Afterwards, they cut out a piece of his bone for sampling, pulled fifteen teeth in order to test the effects, and the torture was so bad that Cade escaped the hospital in the middle of the night. And while he did escape from the prolonged torture that was being directed from the US government, he eventually died of heart failure several years after the harsh experiments that left him with devastated health.

Cade was not the only victim. And it’s all openly admitted in released information. This is not conspiracy theory, the United States government authorized this and are likely conducting similar and far worse operations today. There is a deep history of medical testing by the US government, including one Obama was somewhat recently forced to go public over surrounding the purposeful infection of hundreds in Guatemala with sexually-transmitted diseases.

REASON 2: 45 YEAR US GOVT EUGENICS PROGRAM FORCIBLY STERILIZED 60,000

Here’s another piece of forgotten history that absolutely no one dares to discuss despite being 100% on the record and undisputed. From 1929 to 1974, the United States government ran a sterilization program that went around forcibly sterilizing those deemed to be ‘unfit’ to breed. We’re talking ‘break down your door’ sterilizations for anyone deemed mentally disabled, those with a criminal record, women who were raped, and minority groups that politicians said were ‘unfit’ to breed.

During the 45 year sterilization program that affected 60,000 people nationwide, black women were specifically targeted by insane minions on government orders to silence their ability to reproduce. Even the Associated Press writers that the program had direct ties to the eugenics movement of Nazi Germany, specifically when it came to the extremely harsh sterilization protocol of North Carolina. AP reports:

“North Carolina’s program stood out because it ramped up sterilizations after World War II despite associations between eugenics and Nazi Germany.”

REASON 3: DHS HAS DECLARED PORTION OF US ‘CONSTITUTION FREE ZONE’

It’s not a joke, it’s not a conspiracy theory, it’s just plain reality that is not covered by the talking head script readers on MSNBC or CNN. The Department of Homeland Security has decided to override the United States Constitution for 197 million US citizens, declaring that anywhere within 100 miles of a US ‘border’ (oceans included, of course) is living in a Fourth Amendment free area. I addressed it in my article ‘Are You Living In A Fourth Amendment Free Zone‘ article, and the most amazing thing happened.

At first, the comments came rolling in criticizing me for ‘making it up’ and promoting ‘sensationalism’. Then, they actually clicked the links. They actually went to the ACLU website and read the documentation and saw the Wired article on the subject. Then, activism sprouted up and the article has several tens of thousands of shares on various social media platforms and has even been involved in a campaign to blast the media with the news. Once people realize these topics aren’t based in ‘conspiracy’ but all openly admitted, some amazing things happen.

REASON 4: OBAMA PROMISED TO STOP SPYING ON US IN 2007

It was of course the campaigning Obama who said in a 2007 speech, which became a staple push of his campaign, that he would immediately end the spying on US citizens that the Bush administration had been running with the Patriot Act. Here’s exactly what he said:

“This Administration also puts forward a false choice between the liberties we cherish and the security we demand…
That means no more illegal wire-tapping of American citizens. No more national security letters to spy on citizens who are not suspected of a crime. No more tracking citizens who do nothing more than protest a misguided war. No more ignoring the law when it is inconvenient. That is not who we are. And it is not what is necessary to defeat the terrorists… We will again set an example for the world that the law is not subject to the whims of stubborn rulers, and that justice is not arbitrary.”

If you want literal lies from your government, lies from your President who was apparently elected by a majority of voters who felt he was the man for the job (not that Romney was any better of course), there you have it. Obama has now gone on to rally for the exposed NSA spying that records all of your online chats, phone calls, and just about every online activity you can dream of.

REASON 5: US GOVT FUNDS MEGA BANKS WHO FINANCE DRUG TRADE, TERROR CELLS

Thanks to the taxpayers and the government’s complete backing of the mega banks that strip the economy raw, these mega banks are now generating $83 billion per year. But what are these bankers doing with their $83 in taxpayer-based greenbacks? Well for one thing, they’re funding known terror cells and the Mexican drug trade. But don’t believe me (after all, I’m not the honorable US government), just look at the 2012 NBC report on the subject that no one happened to noticed.

In the report, it details how not only were mega banks going in and literally fueling with Mexican drug trade that ends with countless innocent deaths each year and absolutely breeds violence for Mexico and the US combined, but they were also aiding known terror cells. As it turns out, that apparently does not warrant reconsideration of the $83 billion we allow them to rake in per year through taxpayer assistance.

Bill Gates Will Give You $100,000 to Build a Better Condom

http://mashable.com/2013/03/23/bill-gates-condom/

Alex Fitzpatrick

Condoms are recognized and used by an estimated 750 million people across the world and reduce both unwanted pregnancy and the spread of sexually-transmitted infections. However, unlike most other technologies, they haven't changed much in the last half-century. So isn't it about time for something new?

Yes, says the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which is offering $100,000 of initial funding with up to $1 million of possible continued funding to whoever designs the "next generation of condoms." What might such a futuristic prophylactic look like?

"The primary drawback from the male perspective is that condoms decrease pleasure as compared to no condom," says the Foundation's description of the challenge.

"The primary drawback from the male perspective is that condoms decrease pleasure as compared to no condom," says the Foundation's description of the challenge. So a "next-generation" condom would, perhaps, find some way to increase sensation as to get men to wear them more often — purely in the name of global health, of course.

Female condoms, meanwhile, "suffer from some of the same liabilities as male condoms, require proper insertion training and are substantially more expensive than their male counterparts," says the Foundation. So a cheaper, simpler female condom might also help reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies and spread of STIs, including HIV/AIDS.

Got an idea for building a better condom? Proposals sent to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation must have a "testable hypothesis, include an associated plan for how the idea would be tested or validated and yield interpretable and unambiguous data" to receive continued funding toward development. Ideas that prove too expensive for widespread use in the developing world, or those that don't do the job of preventing pregnancy or disease transmission will be dismissed right off the bat.

The next-generation condom challenge is part of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's "Grand Challenges Explorations," a continuing initiative to fund programs geared toward improving the lot of the world's poorest citizens.

"To overcome persistent health and development problems, we need new, game-changing ideas," said Chris Wilson, Director of Global Health Discovery & Translational Science at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, in a statement. "Inspiration can come from anywhere and we are hopeful that this new round of Grand Challenges Explorations will uncover innovative approaches to improve lives around the world."

Ideas for a better condom and other global health innovations are being accepted at GrandChallenges.org. How would you build a better condom? Share your thoughts in the comments.

Iraq war killed 120,000, cost U.S. $800 billion

 http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/03/16/world/iraq-war-killed-120000-cost-u-s-800-billion/#.UUaUmTeBqSp

  

Civilian tragedy: Shams Karim, 7, who was blinded and scarred by the bomb that killed her mother six years ago, cuddles up to her grandmother in Baghdad. She takes tranquilizers to control outbursts of crying and screaming. | AP

At least 116,000 Iraqi civilians and more than 4,800 coalition troops died in Iraq between the outbreak of war in 2003 and the U.S. withdrawal in 2011, researchers estimated Friday.

Its involvement in Iraq has so far cost the United States $810 billion and could eventually reach $3 trillion, they added.

The estimates come from two U.S. professors of public health, reporting in the British peer-reviewed journal The Lancet.

They base the figures on published studies in journals and on reports by government agencies, international organizations and the news media.

“We conclude that at least 116,903 Iraqi noncombatants and more than 4,800 coalition military personnel died over the eight-year course” of the war from 2003 to 2011, they said.

“Many Iraqi civilians were injured or became ill because of damage to the health-supporting infrastructure of the country, and about 5 million were displaced.

“More than 31,000 U.S. military personnel were injured and a substantial percentage of those deployed suffered posttraumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, and other neuropsychological disorders and their concomitant psychosocial problems.”

Citing figures from the website costofwar.com, which looks at funding allocated by Congress, the study said that as of Jan. 15 this year, the Iraq war had cost the United States about $810 billion, “not including interest on debt.”

“The ultimate cost of the war to the USA could be $3 trillion,” it said. “Clearly, this money could have been spent instead on domestic and global programs to improve health. The diversion of human resources was also substantial, in Iraq, the USA, and other coalition countries.”

The paper was authored by Barry Levy of Tufts University School of Medicine in Boston and Victor Sidel of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York.

It appears in a package of investigations into the health consequences of the Iraq war, published by The Lancet to mark the 10th anniversary of the start of the conflict.

In 2006, estimates by researchers at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, also published in The Lancet, said 655,000 people had died in the first 40 months of the conflict. That figure was widely contested.

In 2008, a study by the Iraqi government and World Health Organization said between 104,000 and 223,000 Iraqis had died violent deaths between March 2003 and June 2006.