Secret Meeting in
London: Plotting to Wage War on Syria without UN Authorization
Britain’s
“Duplicity, treachery and infidelity.”
Felicity Arbuthnot
Somewhere between
being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize and the consolidating farce of the
presentation in Oslo yesterday, recipients were plotting another freedom and
democracy bringing “humanitarian intervention”, illegal regime change and the
destruction of a country in order to save it.
Remember Libya was
“not going to be another Iraq” disaster, “lessons have been learned”? Libya’s
ruined towns and social structure of course, chillingly resemble Iraq. Now, it
is Syria’s turn, but Syria will “not be another Libya”, yes mistakes were made,
but lessons have yet again been learned.
Today’s (London)
Independent cover story reports the: “plan for (the) international coalition to
provide air and naval support, plus military training for the opposition”,
commenting that :“Western intervention is now deemed necessary as civil war has
reached ‘tipping point’ “ and of course: “Britain, France and US agree ‘no
boots on the ground.’ “
This is the outcome
of a secret meeting in London recently, hosted by Sir David Richards, who heads
Britain’s armed forces. Participants in the scheming were: “the military chiefs
of France, Turkey, Jordan, Qatar, the UAE and” (surprise) “a three star
American General.” The paper records: “Strategy was discussed at length”, with
other UK government Ministries “and their counterparts in allied states” also
holding meetings – read plotting another overthrow of massive illegality,
of a sovereign leader and government.
“L’Angleterre, ah,
la perfide Angleterre …” is an expression regarding Britain believed to go back
as far as the 13th century relating to acts of “duplicity, treachery
and infidelity” in relations with other nation states, states Wiki neatly.
Prime Minister
Cameron is determined to involve Britain in more bloodshed, having learned
nothing from his disastrous involvement in Libya – sorry, he is: “ … determined
that more should be done by Britain to bring an end to the strife …” That would
be a first, and of course Foreign Secretary Hague (“I have been a
Conservative Friend of Israel since I was sixteen”) has long been stating that
Britain must arm the insurgents and pledging considerable sums to do so.
Seemingly it was
blithely decided at the meeting that since “boots on the ground” ie., another
illegal invasion is to be excluded (we’ll see) “training camps can be set up in
Turkey” for the terrorists.
The use of air power
and maritime forces, it was thought would be likely to lead to “charges that,
as in Libya, the West is carrying out regime change by force.” Quite.
“Mission creep” is
already writ large.
Further, a “senior
Whitehall official” is quoted as saying: “If this is worth doing , then it is
worth doing professionally; training the Free Syrian Army and providing them
with air and maritime support.”
The conclusion is
that another murderous intervention is: “now inevitable.” French military
advisers have apparently met insurgent groups in Lebanon and: “The US is said
to have stockpiled weapons retrieved in Libya for future supply” to the
insurgents.
The action, as Iraq,
is planned to go ahead without UN authorization, since that would in near
certainty be blocked by China and Russia on the Security Council.
One multi-million
dollar question remains, will Russia and China sit quietly on the sidelines and
allow another bloodbath and overthrow, having been so comprehensively duped
over Libya?
Oh, and will there
be another hapless Ambassador Christopher Stevens type, landing with a
contingency of US-armed thugs, from a cargo ship laden with weapons and
equipment, or have America’s “diplomats” been overcome with a derring-do
deficit after the terrible events of Benghazi on 11th September?
