#COVID “#DetentionCamps?” #StateGovernment #Proposal Revealed

by: Sara Middleton, staff writer | January 9, 2021

(NaturalHealth365) It’s been over a year since the COVID-19 pandemic began.  Now, even as lockdowns and curfews persist and the vaccine rollout continues across America, we continue to find ourselves surprised by the troubling, if not creative ways, that government officials attempt to squeeze more control out of the situation.

The latest harrowing example is a New York State-sponsored proposal that demands detention camp for anyone identified as a “case, contact or carrier” of a contagious disease.  It’s a harrowing revelation – and would be so even if there weren’t already serious questions about the COVID-19 testing accuracy and false-positive rates.

COVID “camps” on the horizon?  Disturbing details about how free citizens should be forcibly detained

The New York State Assembly bill in question is called Bill A416 and is sponsored by a Democratic member of the New York State Assembly, N. Nick Perry.  As of January 4, 2021, the bill has been introduced to the 2021-2022 Legislative Session and is currently in front of the Assembly Health Committee.

Bill A416, in summary, “[r]elates to the removal of cases, contacts, and carriers of communicable

#ShockingVideo: #FaceShields will NOT Effectively Stop the #SpreadOfCOVID19

by: Joy Jensen, staff writer | December 26, 2020

(NaturalHealth365) One of the popular alternatives to face masks through the COVID-19 pandemic has been plastic face shields.  Many people prefer them because they’re less restrictive, and they also allow the mouth to be seen, something that’s useful when speaking to individuals who may have difficulty hearing. But do face shields really keep you safe from the spread of COVID-19?

One shocking new video revealed that a face shield doesn’t keep you protected from the coronavirus.  In fact, the research behind the video – published in the Physics of Fluids journal, showed face shields could not protect from the vortex rings that are generated when someone sneezes.

Face shields proven ineffective by researchers

To find out how effective face shields are at protecting wearers from COVID-19, Japanese researchers at Fukuoka University investigated what happens to the airflow around a face shield when someone standing a meter away sneezes. They simulated the situation using a computer-generated model, specifically looking at sneezes because they produce “vortex rings” that are generated when fluids are instantaneously ejected from the mouth and nose.

These vortex rings capture the aerosols in the sneeze, transporting them to the bottom and top edges of face shields where they may enter the area and get into the wearer’s nose. Simply inhale at that moment, and you’ll end up inhaling those aerosols. These results led researchers to conclude that wearing a face shield is not highly effective at preventing coronavirus infection.

Improving the effectiveness of face masks?

The Global Elite Want to Forever Change the Way You Live with “The Great Reset” Agenda

by: Sara Middleton, staff writer | November 21, 2020

(NaturalHealth365) It’s hard not to feel wary about economic initiatives that value big business over human well-being and autonomy.  But with so much influence over society among the world’s corporate leaders, critics can be easily overpowered.  Just consider the latest initiative from a collaboration of business leaders called The Great Reset.

Spearheaded by the World Economic Forum, this reset pledges to promote widespread economic change to the direct “benefit” of the global population. But reading between the lines, many are calling into question just who exactly will benefit most.

World Economic Forum proposes new initiative that pledges to drive down food scarcity, hunger – but many question its globalist, industry-focused approach

Dr. Blaylock: #FaceMasks Pose Serious #Risks to the #Healthy

Posted on:

Saturday, May 16th 2020 at 10:00 am

Written By:

Dr. Russell Blaylock

Originally published on www.technocracy.news

Dr. Russell Blaylock warns that not only do face masks fail to protect the healthy from getting sick, but they also create serious health risks to the wearer. The bottom line is that if you are not sick, you should not wear a face mask.

As businesses reopen, many are requiring shoppers and employees to wear a face mask. Costco, for instance, will not allow shoppers into the store without wearing a face mask. Many employers are requiring all employees to wear a face mask while at work. In some jurisdictions, all citizens must wear a face mask if they are outside of their own home.  ⁃ TN Editor

With the advent of the so-called COVID-19 pandemic, we have seen a number of medical practices that have little or no scientific support as regards reducing the spread of this infection. One of these measures is the wearing of facial masks, either a surgical-type mask, bandana or N95 respirator mask. When this pandemic began and we knew little about the virus itself or its epidemiologic behavior, it was assumed that it would behave, in terms of spread among communities, like other respiratory viruses. Little has presented itself after intense study of this virus and its behavior to change this perception.

This is somewhat of an unusual virus in that for the vast majority of people infected by the virus, one experiences either no illness (asymptomatic) or very little sickness. Only a very small number of people are at risk of a potentially serious outcome from the infection--mainly those with underlying serious medical conditions in conjunction with advanced age and frailty, those with immune compromising conditions and nursing home patients near the end of their lives. There is growing evidence that the treatment protocol issued to treating doctors by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), mainly intubation and use of a ventilator (respirator), may have contributed significantly to the high death rate in these select individuals.

By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.

Russell Blaylock, MD

As for the scientific support for the use of face mask, a recent careful examination of the literature, in

#BillGates #Funds Invisible #TattooID to #TrackPeople

by: Sara Middleton, staff writer | April 27, 2020

 

(NaturalHealth365) Should billionaire Bill Gates have a say in what goes into your body, or your children’s bodies? It certainly seems like that’s been his end goal ever since he started going on record about wanting to invent new vaccines as part of his push for population control.

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, many skeptical consumers are now wondering if the SARS-CoV-2 virus is actually a “blessing” for Bill Gates and his cronies. There’s even a clear paper trail connecting Gates to 2019 research that literally figured out a way to tattoo proof of vaccines onto children’s skin … and no – this is not science fiction.

Suspicion grows: Does Bill Gates, long hopeful that vaccines will help curb population growth, want global citizens to “prove” they get the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine with invisible tattoo?

The coronavirus scare is the perfect vehicle for Gates to complete his depraved plan of vaccinating everyone on the planet.

We already have multiple examples of the billionaire publicly stating that he wants vaccines, along with family planning policies and other interventions, to slow population growth and reduce the global population by 10 to 15 percent over the coming decades. (Here’s video proof, in his own words.)

And while fact checker websites like Snopes insist that Gates is pouring billions of dollars into vaccines as a way to “improve” people’s lives rather than act as an “agent of death,” many are deeply