#Vaccine - #Vacuna

15-Miinute Video: 

Vaccinations as Good for you as Wars, Banksters, Corporate Media!

Wars cause peace, especially our wars, especially now. More wars cause even more peace, so obviously bigger wars are better for peace. The very best war, therefore, is global nuclear World War III.

Banks that create what we use for money as ever-increasing total debt must be “bailed-out” and “bailed-in” because debt causes prosperity. The more debt created by banks, the more prosperous we all are. Obviously, therefore, our best condition is to only have debt with all assets owned by bank oligarchs. Another benefit of serfdom is peacefulness; second only to war.

History shows empires use media propaganda to mask “Big Lie” crimes centered in war and money. But, here and now, the US is not an empire, and Americans receive truthful media. The evidence is self-obvious in light of constant reporting of peaceful wars, prosperous debt, and continuous sports/entertainment.

Because we rightfully trust US leaders with war, money, and honesty, we should absolutely trust vaccinations; especially that all children get all required ~70 shots (here, here).

Ken Anton reports on this resource page with videos:

Syria: Media Disinformation and Corporate Media’s “Independent Bloggers”

Syria: 

Media Disinformation, War Propaganda 

and the Corporate Media’s “Independent Bloggers”

By Phil Greaves

A glaring example of one of the major pitfalls emerging in supposed “new media” has arisen during the conflict in Syria. Most notably in the form of YouTube blogger, and self-proclaimed weapons expert Eliot Higgins, aka “Brown Moses”. The clique of highly ideological analysts, think-tankers and journalists Higgins’ regularly works with and consults – alongside the dubiously funded western NGO’s he receives payment from – provide a stark indication as to the factions within the corporate media circus this supposedly independent blogger is operating in unison with.

Higgins has provided the western corporate media apparatus the opportunity to present its war-propaganda as having a “new media” facade of impartial legitimacy. Yet it is the same capitalistic “old media” apparatus endlessly promoting his work – consisting of scouring Jihadist war-porn and agitprop on YouTube for tidbits that may bolster corporate media narratives – as an invaluable tool in tracking human rights abuses, arms trafficking, and risk-free coverage of fast evolving conflicts. Yet contrary to the innocuous portrayal of an unemployed YouTube addict in Leicester becoming a credible analyst of a conflict in the Middle East; Higgins’ blog has been thrust into the foreground not through the benefit of impartiality or public appraisals, but through corporate “benefactors” with vested interest operating alongside the same “old media” organisations and stenographers.