Busca en Nuestros Archivos

Busca en Nuestro Blog

Translate / Traducir

Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Lyndon LaRouche. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Lyndon LaRouche. Mostrar todas las entradas

17 marzo, 2013

LaRouche: Stop the Coverup of Brit-Saudi Role in 9/11

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2013/4011coverup_9_11.html
by Nancy Spannaus
March 12—During his March 8 webcast, American statesman Lyndon LaRouche demanded immediate release of the crucial 28 pages in the Congressional Joint Inquiry into the 9/11 attack on the United States, which have been redacted to protect the collaboration between U.S. traitors and the Saudi monarchy, in perpetrating that history-changing crime.
The timeliness of LaRouche's demand is shown by fact that the Obama Administration is continuing the very alliance with the arm of the British Empire's Saudi kingdom that was operative with the Bush family in 9/11/2001—an alliance which could lead directly toward World War III. Specifically, Obama has given the green light to escalating Saudi support for terrorist groups fighting Syria's Assad government, and continues to protect, if not encourage, the Saudi-funded jihadis who are running amok in North Africa, and were the assassins of U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, among others.
At this point, where the Obama Administration is already reeling from the bipartisan revolt against its murderous drone policy, and Rep. Walter Jones (R-N.C.) has called for the release of the 28 pages, an escalation of political pressure could expose the traitorous coverup, and derail the war drive.
A Damning Indictment
The second question addressed to LaRouche at the March 8 webcast, took up 9/11/2001, in terms of how it laid the basis for the current killer-drone and global-war policy of first the Bush, and then the Obama administrations, by getting Congress to agree to the Authorization of the Use of Military Force (AUMF) on Sept. 14, 2001. That resolution—which, only now, some members of Congress are introducing legislation to repeal—authorized "the President to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons, he determines planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks ... or, who harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States...."
Bush used the AUMF to authorize the war in Afghanistan, the 2003 war in Iraq—in reality, a whole process of "global war" which Obama has not only continued, but expanded by his terror drone warfare around the world. Domestically, it was used to drastically increase police-state measures against American citizens and residents as well.
This was, indeed, the outcome which the real authors of 9/11—tools of the British monarchy such as then-Prime Minister Tony Blair, and the Saudi royal family—desired. But, to achieve it, they had to carry out a coverup of how 9/11 was actually run.
LaRouche and EIR have long exposed the British-Saudi role, with the complicity of de facto traitors like Bush and Obama, in 9/11 and its coverup which continues to this day. In his March 8 response, LaRouche insisted this coverup must end now.
"We know that the 9/11 operation, as it's been called, was organized by a trio of agencies: the British monarchy, the BAE military institution, and the Saudi government. And we also know that the ambassador of Saudi Arabia to the United States was involved in organizing the funding of the pilots who participated in those attacks. And we also know that the Bush Administration knew that this was this case, because it was the Bush Administration that organized the safe exit of those Saudi families which were tied to that part of Saudi business in the United States. The whole nation was shut down at that point; no one could fly in or out, except the Saudis, who were escorted out from Texas and other places where they had been, meeting with the Bush family, for example.
"So this whole operation then, was entirely that. But what's the significance? The significance is very simple: Who could get the United States, which had just suffered a major attack from Saudi and British forces, who were involved in this because the British institutions, the BAE, and the Saudi institutions, were all part of this operation? So, who could do that? We know exactly who did it: It was done by the British monarchy! The British monarchy set the whole thing up. That's the guilty party, and that's what the coverup is all about.
"Now, I think the simple thing is, I think the British monarchy should, shall we say, be restrained....
"And what we have, is we have people in the United States, in high positions of government, high positions of politics, and of business interests, of banking interests, of the kind that have swallowed everything up: That's where the enemy lies. And the point is, the United States has been betrayed by its own government, knowledgeably. Don't you think that they know what this thing is? Don't you think this is known? How can you suppress something without knowing what it is you're suppressing?
"No, this is the great crime, this is a great treason, by all of those officials of the government in the United States, who are complicit in the coverup! The evidence was there. Why, then, if the evidence is not there, why don't they just publish the 28 pages? Why don't they? Because they're covering it up. Because they're working for a foreign power against the people of the United States. That's the truth of the matter, and if the people of the United States realize what has been done to them, they will demand relief from the kind of crap they've been put through all of these years, especially since 2001."
Congress Has the Power
It is the U.S. Congress, which, as a body, has consistently shown the backbone of a worm for more than a decade, which has the responsibility, and power, to break the coverup. The CIA has responded to Freedom of Information requests for information on the Congressional report by saying that it is Congress, not the CIA, which alone has the authority to declassify the information.
Taking the lead, once again, in goading Congress to act is Rep. Walter Jones, who has worked across party lines from the time of the Clinton Administration on, against wars started by administrations without authorization from Congress, and other matters.
On Feb. 26, Jones posted on his website the following letter, calling for the release of the infamous redacted 28 pages of Congressional Joint Inquiry on 9/11. Dated Feb. 14, the letter is addressed to the Republican and Democratic leaders of the House Permanent Committee on Intelligence:
"Dear Chairman Rogers and Ranking Member Ruppersberger:
"I want to thank you for conducting the very important hearings last week on the killing of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and the three other State Department officials during the Benghazi attack on September 11, 2012.
"In light of those hearings, I urge you, as chairman and ranking member, to recommend a declassification of the 28 pages of the Congressional Joint Inquiry report describing what role the Saudi Arabian government had in the terrorist attack on 9/11. As you know, former Senator Bob Graham has conducted extensive research into this issue and has been nationally recognized and interviewed for his belief that these 28 pages should be declassified.
"The families of the victims of 9/11 have a right to this information, as do the American people. Since your committee has jurisdiction over this matter, I ask you and the ranking member to please review the attached correspondence from Mr. Mike Low, who lost a daughter on American Airlines flight 11 on that tragic day. As Mr. Low states, 'Our hope is that over time, history will have the total truth of all the events of 9/11.'
"Mr. Chairman, the American people have a right to know the truth. It is critical for the citizens of this country to have trust in their government. I hope that you will take this into consideration and I look forward to hearing back from you."

04 enero, 2013

Para detener la Tercera Guerra Mundial



Para detener la Tercera Guerra Mundial, saquen al Presidente Obama por su alianza con Al-Qaeda en Libia y en Siria

Mientras que viaja por el país y alrededor del mundo, reclamando el crédito por la muerte de Osama bin Laden, el Presidente Barack Obama ha venido forjando una alianza a fondo con Al-Qaeda para derrocar primero al gobierno de Libia y ahora al gobierno de Siria. La política insensata e ilícita de aliarse con los perpetradores del 11 de septiembre de 2001 y luego el 11 de septiembre de 2012, para emprender una guerra sin la autorización del Congreso en violación de la Constitución de Estados Unidos, es lo que lleva al peligro inmediato de desatar una guerra mundial, la cual ahora solo podría significar guerra termonuclear.
Este es "el elefante en la sala" que explica por qué el gobierno de Obama ha mentido y encubierto los hechos reales sobre los sucesos en Benghazi. La política de aliarse con Al-Qaeda y encubrir esa alianza y sus consecuencias, constituye en verdad una ofensa que amerita juicio político. La cuestión es si los miembros del Congreso tendrán el valor de luchar por la verdad y por la justicia a nombre de las victimas de esta política criminal.
Esta ficha actualizada presenta la evidencia disponible actualmente al dominio público. Una investigación seria del Congreso develaría mucho más. Aquí están los hechos conocidos hasta ahora:
En el caso de Libia, la evidencia es abrumadora. Bajo la guisa del intervencionismo humanitario, el Presidente Obama ordenó a las fuerzas armadas estadounidenses crear una zona de exclusión de vuelos para darle apoyo aéreo a las agrupaciones de Al-Qaeda a fin de derrocar a Muammar Gaddafi.
http://spanish.larouchepac.com/node/18212
 

12 noviembre, 2012

7 de noviembre de 2012: Un día que vivirá en la infamia

http://spanish.larouchepac.com/node/17910
Enseguida se reproducen los comentarios de Lyndon LaRouche al inicio del programa semanal LPAC Weekly Report de hoy, luego de que se anunciaron los resultados de las elecciones presidenciales de 2012. 
Un verdadero gran Presidente, el 7 de diciembre de 1941, declaró que ese día fue un “día de infamia”. Y lo mismo se puede decir del 7 de noviembre, ahora. 
Lo que sucedió obviamente que causó este resultado fue predeterminado en Florida, en el mentado último debate que ocurrió. Y en ese momento, en realidad, el candidato republicano capituló, de modo en que no me sorprendió que lo haya hecho, como ayer. Este es verdaderamente un “día de infamia”. 
Ahora bien, cuando nos enfrentamos a un día de infamia, como lo hizo Roosevelt con el del 7 de diciembre de 1941, un americano que sea líder de algún tipo, tiene que responder de cierto modo. Y como no tenemos un candidato presidencial creíble a la vista, incluyendo al que hemos puesto en el cargo de nuevo por ahora, yo tengo que decir algo al respecto. 
¿Qué sucedió? El candidato republicano capituló ante Wall Street. Esto es, que el Partido Republicano está fuertemente representado en Wall Street, y mientras que él pudo haber ganado fácilmente la Presidencia, con razones, simplemente señalando la cuestión del crimen cometido por el Presidente en turno, al dejar de hacer eso, bajo presión de los representantes o voces de Wall Street, se perdió todo. De ahí en adelante, todo pendía de un hilo, y eventualmente, se perdió. Se perdió debido al fraude de la camarilla de Obama y demás, y se convirtió en ese momento en una causa perdida, y obviamente, los republicanos simplemente entregaron todo lo que les habían dado. Ahora, eso es lo que tenemos enfrente. 
¿Cuáles son las consecuencias de esta selección de la reelección de este Presidente? Bueno, primero que todo, significa que vamos a tener las peores condiciones que haya tenido el pueblo estadounidense en los últimos siglos; van a golpear de repente. Una combinación de austeridad e hiperinflación va a golpear. Lo que va a suceder es que ¡va a aumentar la tasa de mortalidad entre la gente más pobre y otras de Estados Unidos! Nada bueno, como tal, saldrá de este resultado electoral. Por lo tanto, tenemos que hacer frente a la realidad. 
Ahora bien, ¿cuál es la realidad? La realidad es la probabilidad de una guerra termonuclear, que significaría la virtual extinción de la humanidad, que ocurrirá probablemente, a menos que podamos impedirlo por otros medios. Pero así estamos. Nos dirigimos hacia la guerra; el gobierno de Obama es un gobierno de guerra, y si no se le puede obstaculizar de algún modo, ¡sucederá¡ Y si hay una guerra, si hay una guerra entre las naciones ahora, será una guerra termonuclear, de la cual muy poca gente sobreviva probablemente, y quizás la civilización en su conjunto no sobreviviría. 
Entonces, la cuestión es, ¿qué vamos a hacer, en términos de la incertidumbre? Lo que siempre hemos hecho, como hizo George Washington al cruzar el Delaware; siempre hacemos el tipo de cosas que son necesarias para salvar a la civilización y para salvar a esta nación en particular. Y lo vamos hacer según la ley. Y se hará de acuerdo a la ley, y en el debido momento, este Presidente estará fuera del cargo. Puede ser pronto, puede ser algo más tarde, pero no es apto para servir, moral y factualmente, y ¡no estará en el cargo por mucho tiempo! Con esperanza, algo de Estados Unidos sobrevivirá. 
Y voy a decir más al respecto en los próximos días. Pero esta es la primera ocasión en la que tenemos una expresión oficial de nuestra organización, desde el anuncio de la elección, y por lo tanto, era mí deber señalar este punto, esta mañana, en esta ocasión, para dejarlo por sentado.