#French #Invade #Reich

NEW YORK TIMES SHOCK HEADLINE

SEPTEMBER 7, 1939

'FRENCH INVADE REICH'

By Mike King

SPECIAL REPORT

The 1939 Saar Offensive / Invasion of Germany is not new to your humble author. What I did not expect, however, was to find news of this little-known French invasion of Germany - which took place just days after Britain & France declared war on Germany - to be plastered on the front page of an old issue of the New York Slimes. Oh how I just luuuuuv using the Jewish-owned Slimes to confirm the truth of World War II for those stubborn newspaper-worshipping blockheads who still believe in the myth of "The Good War."

A full 8 months before The Great One (that's Hitler for all you newbies & normies)finally was to launch the preemptive invasion of the puppet Low Countries (Belgium / Netherlands) and France, the not-so-innocent French initiate the Saar offensive; the ground invasion into Saarland, Germany. The large scale assault was supposed to have been carried out by 40 divisions and 40 tank battalions. According to the Franco-Polish military convention, the French Army had planned to gain control over the area between the French border and the Siegfried Line of German defense. Much to the dismay of the fools in Poland, the full 40-division all-out assault does not materialize. The empty promise is just a trick just to get Poland's stupid Marshal Edward Rydz-Smigly -- secure in the belief that the Allies would later allow him take all of Prussia --to pick a fight with Germany.

But a limited invasion and occupation of Germany’s Saar region does indeed occur. On October 16 &

#Trump and the #Taiwan #Gambit

Say Hello to the Russia-China Mobile Operating System
By Pepe Escobar
Google cuts Huawei off Android; so Huawei may migrate to Aurora. Call it mobile Eurasia integration; the evolving Russia-China strategic partnership may be on the verge of spawning its own operating system – and that is not a metaphor. Read more...

Poland Just Became America’s Most Important NATO Ally
By Andrew Korybko
The US’ decision to dispatch 1,000 additional “rotational” troops and even a squadron of surveillance drones to Poland makes the Central European country its most important NATO ally because of the threat that this poses to Russian strategic interests in Kaliningrad, Belarus, Crimea, and Eastern Ukraine, which in turn revives the historical rivalry between these two regional powers over the shared space between them. Read more...

Behind the Scenes and Elections: Koch-Oil Big Lies and Ecocide Writ Large in Canada

Adolf #Hitler: #Man of #Peace

By Mike King

Left: Averting war with UK Prime Minister Chamberlain in 1938

Right: Making peace with French Marshal Petain in 1940 

$100 CASH REWARD...

...for the first reader who can prove just one mistatement of a material fact, or find one misquote in the following presentation. TomatoBubble.com will issue an immediate public retraction / correction, and pay you $100 cash for your effort!

Submit any misinformation you find to: greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

Adolf Hitler's numerous, and reasonable, offers of peace to the Allied powers are a matter of indisputable historical record. Establishment 'Court Historians' cannot deny the reality of these reasonable offers, so they choose to simply ignore them instead.

If the truth of Hitler's pleas for peace were to become widely known, it would stand the conventional narrative of World War II (and subsequent events) on its head. Consider the following true statements and events, and decide for yourself who the "aggressor" behind World War II really was.

1939 

Hitler proposes peaceful solutions to the problem of the 'Polish Corridor'

After World War I, the victorious allies had carved up German territory and given part of Germany (Western Prussia) to the newly re-established nation of Poland. Eastern Prussia was left isolated; totally cut off from Germany. Tensions among Poles, Jews and minority Germans simmered in the area.

To resolve the problem, Hitler makes numerous sensible proposals; which include: demilitarization of

1940: Why Did #Hitler #Invade #Belgium & #Holland?

THE SETTING

Eight months have passed since the Allied powers of Britain & France had declared war against Germany for its justified invasion of Poland. The Allies have ignored Hitler's numerous pleas for peace while amassing their armies in Northern France, close to France's border with Belgium. Other than low-scale British and German maneuvers in Norway and Denmark, the great bloodbath known as World War II has not yet begun and can still be avoided.

The tiny states of Belgium and The Netherlands / Holland (both members of the Globalist League of Nations) claim to be "neutral." In reality, under the pressure and influence of mighty England & France (also members of the League of Nations) the two mini-states have been assisting the Allies in their preparation for an attack upon Germany - which had quit the League of Nations in 1933. On May 10, 1940, Hitler orders the invasion of the Low Countries.

Britain, France, Holland and Belgium were all members of the Globalist League of Nations. Germany took the fight to them in self-defense. 

The hysterical headlines of the West's major newspapers rush to condemn Germany's aggression, and today's history books portray the event as ultimate evidence that Hitler had been lying all along about not wanting to fight a war with the Western powers. Lost in the history books is the fact that Germany believed that it had no choice but to invade because Belgium and Holland were plotting with the Allies, while claiming to be neutral.

Even amidst its anti-German hysteria, The New York Times, in an effort to appear "objective", did indeed publish "Germany's side of the story", in the form of statements issued by German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop. It is an account that you will neither find in contemporary history books, nor hear on a TV crockumentary.

During better times, Hitler (left) and von Ribbentrop (right) enjoy a good laugh. 

Even if, for the sake of argument, we were to reject Germany's claim as being a false propaganda pretext for war, a la 'Weapons of Mass Destruction', the question remains: why do the 'court-historians' continue to conceal such serious allegations from us? Why are we not given all of the data so that we can make up our own minds? What are they so afraid of? The truth?

In the belief that "there are two sides to every story", we are posting abridged reproductions of the May 10 and May 11 Times articles containing the von Ribbentrop allegations. A few bits of highlighted analysis are also included.The full originals can be viewed by copy-paste-enlarging the article images.

******** 

As you can see, press accounts from New York's two major Jewish-owned newspapers of May 10, 1940 were heavily slanted against the "Nazis": 

But a de-emphasized article from that same Times' issue did present a different version of events -- an 'inconvenient' version that has long since 'disappeared' from history.

CONTINUE READING

#Debunking the #Myth of #Nazi #Looted #Art

tomatobubble,com

THE MONUMENTS MEN

Starring George Clooney, Matt Damon, Bill Murray, Cate Blanchett - directed by George Clooney.
Based on the book by Robert Edsel

OFFICIAL DESCRIPTION
"Based on the true story of the greatest treasure hunt in history, The Monuments Men is an action-thriller focusing on an unlikely World War II platoon, tasked by FDR with going into Germany to rescue artistic masterpieces from Nazi thieves and returning them to their rightful owners.

It would be an impossible mission: with the art trapped behind enemy lines, and with the German army under orders to destroy everything as the Reich fell, how could these guys, seven museum directors, curators, and art historians, all more familiar with Michelangelo than the M-1, possibly hope to succeed?

But as the Monuments Men, as they were called, found themselves in a race against time to avoid the destruction of 1000 years of culture, they would risk their lives to protect and defend mankind's greatest achievements." 

The REAL story of "Nazi Looted Art"

ART PROTECTION DURING WORLD WAR I
Under Kaiser Wilhelm II during World War I, the highly cultured Germans go to great lengths to protect and preserve artworks located in enemy territory or near a zone of combat. The German word to describe this principal of saving Europe's cultural and artistic treasures during wartime is "Kunstschutz" (art protection). 

Kaiser Wilhelm tried to avert the war which was forced upon Germany. Even while winning

#Obama Wants #Poland To Start #WorldWarIII

NY Times: US Troops Enter Poland, 1st Deployment at Russia's Doorstep

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

REBUTTAL BY

The demonic drive to ignite World War III before Orange Man can make friends with the Big Bad Putin has really shifted into high gear with this provocation. Now, all of a sudden, just days away from the departure (we hope?) of Mr. & Mr. Obongo, it has been learned that Poland needs a "deterrent" from a Russian invasion? We already know how stupid the Slimes' readers are, but can they really be that bloody stupid to buy this crap?

Well, it's not a question of buying into this fake argument about "deterrence." The real question is: will people buy it after Russia has been forced to strike the first blow? If the Globalists' history of deliberate provocations serves as an indicator, we are afraid that Boobus will be bamboozled, once again. Haz Mat suits and goggle on. Let's dive into Sulzberger's cesspool and clean up a few excerpts of this erroneous excrement -- originally published by the Associated Press.

HISTORY REPEATS!

Just like eastern Prussia in 1939 (Image 2), the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad is isolated from mainland Russia (Image 3). Any Polish / NATO move against Kaliningrad would compel the Russians to have to pass through (invade) the Baltic States and probably Poland. That is where the U.S. tanks and infantry hope to provoke the Russians into overtly "firing the first shot."

AP/Slimes: WARSAW, Poland — American soldiers rolled into Poland on Thursday, fulfilling a dream some Poles have had ...
Rebuttal: The term "some poles," refers to the obedient vassal class of traitor Poles raised up and sustained by the CIA-NGO complex. Many Poles are actually upset about this recent "deterrence." 

AP/Slimes: ... since the fall of communism in 1989 to have U.S. troops on their soil as a deterrent against Russia.
Rebuttal: If post-communist Russia has neither invaded nor threatened to invade Poland over the past

#War, #Corruption, and #Totalitarianism in #Europe

By Global Research News

Url of this article:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/selected-articles-war-corruption-and-totalitarianism-in-europe/5510730

SELECTED ARTICLES:

Polish Government Expands Police State Powers

By Clara Weiss, February 25 2016

Poland’s right-wing nationalist government has rapidly expanded its police state measures in recent weeks.

The Destabilization and Fracture of the EU: Will the European Union Share the Same Fate as the Soviet Union?

Where Will this #WarFrenzy and #Fearmongering Lead?

By Global Research News

Url of this article: http://www.globalresearch.ca/selected-articles-where-will-this-war-frenzy-and-fearmongering-lead/5495051 

SELECTED ARTICLES:
Where Will this War Frenzy Lead? What Stinks in Saudi Ain’t the Camel Dung. ISIS is A “Saudi Army in Disguise.”

By F. William Engdahl, December 10 2015

What stinks in Saudi Arabia ain’t the camel dung. It’s the monarchy of King Salman and his hot-headed son,

#Holocaust Trickery: #DeathCamps Vs. #WorkCamps #Auschwitz

HOLOHOAX TRICKERY:

DEATH CAMPS vs WORK CAMPS

tomatobubble,com

For the past 20 years or so, it has been fun to watch how the ever-evolving field of 'Holocaust Studies' adjusts to new discoveries which contradict the original narrative. For example, when it became apparent that there wasn't actually any documentation to support the Holohoax, the Holohoaxers abandoned their 50 year old mantra of "It's well documented!", and seamlessly transitioned to "The Germans destroyed the documents" mode.

Another addition to Holocaustianity is the distinction that is now made between "work camps" and "extermination camps". You see, as pathetic and self-abasing as modern day German guilt-trippers are, they still aren't going to say that a certain German-based camp, Dachau for example, had homicidal gas chambers when it didn't, or that "millions" died there when they didn't. The fact that the West, in spite of its intellectual tyranny, was still much more open and free that the old Soviet bloc, began to complicate things for the Holohoaxers. For that reason, all of internment camps which were located in the West are now described as "work camps"; and seven of those located in Poland and Ukraine as "extermination camps". 

The chart below was copied from 'The Jewish Virtual Library ", which pulled the information from the Simon Wiesenthal Center. Notice where the seven "annihilation camps" (in red) are said to have been located:

Six of the "annihilation camps" were based in Poland, one in Ukraine, zero in either Germany, France or the Netherlands. That's a very weird "anomaly". Why the east-west divide between "work" and "extermination"?

It's elementary dear reader, elementary. If you know anything at all about World War II and the subsequent birth of "The Iron Curtain", you know that no western researchers, no aid workers, no religious groups, no Red Cross volunteers, no human rights activists, no investigative researchers and no do-gooders of any stripe ever got a chance to poke around in Joe Stalin's Communist post-war front yard of Poland or Ukraine. Therein lies the rub! Hence, the Holohoaxers, both then and now, can make any claim they want to in regard to what took place in the air-tight closed east.