#JohnTyler vs #Rothschild

1841-1845

President John Tyler vs The Rothschild Bankers

By Mike King

"A poor, miserable, despised imbecile."

*****

When it comes to ranking presidents, the "consensus" of the egghead historians of American academia generally ranks the 20th Century’s most loyal puppets of the New World Order banking Mafia very high, and the proponents of limited government and “hard currency” very low. A 2017 C-Span survey, for example, ranked the following scoundrels in the top 15 of 43 (Trump not included, Grover Cleveland, who served unconnected terms, only counted once):

Franklin D. Roosevelt: 3rd / Teddy Roosevelt: 4th / Harry Truman: 6th / Dwight Eisenhower: 5th / Lyndon Baines Johnson: 10th / Woodrow Wilson: 11th / Obongo: 12th / Bill Clinton: 15th

Bringing up the rear were folks like anti-Globalist Warren Harding (40th), Great Depression “fall guy” Herbert Hoover (36th) and some “no-names” like Millard Filmore (37th), Franklin Pierce (41st) and James Buchanan(43rd).

Coming in at an appalling 39th (5th worse) was President John Tyler, the 10th President of the United States. Historians may have nothing good to say about Tyler, but after stumbling across his “failed” 1841-1845 presidency while researching the post-Jackson years for our new book, Andrew the Great (here), we learned some things about this historical “diamond-in-the-rough” -- a very brave man who, in spite of his lack of name recognition, we must now rank among America’s best Presidents.

The eggheads of high academia have very low regard for President John Tyler -- ranking him 39th out of 43 presidents. That alone is evidence of his effectiveness.

THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT

CONTINUE READING

How The #Spanish #American #War Changed The #World

Teddy Roosevelt's mythical horseback charge up San Juan Hill 

catapulted him to national prominence.

tomatobubble,com

High School history fables taught us that the Spanish-American War of 1898 was a meaningless war instigated by the Yellow Journalist William Randolph Hearst. Here's a typical history-book sample of the retarded drivel that is still being spoon-fed to captive audiences of dumbed down students:

"It is arguable that the Spanish-American War was perhaps the most pointless war in the history of the United States. Although it was not known at the time, the war was not truly fought for territory, for markets, for principle, or even for honor. Rather, it began because William Randolph Hearst, editor of the popular New York Journal sought sensational material to print."

Certainly, Hearst and his Jewish rival at the New York World, Joseph Pulitzer, helped to poison the public mind towards Spain. But this idiotic and incomplete analysis ignores the "big picture" of the Globalist hand which moves the chess pieces. The Spanish-American War was neither "pointless", nor insignificant. To the contrary, without the precedent-setting features, tactical acquisitions, and adverse side-effects of this unjust war, and the prolonged US-Philippines War which grew out of it, World War I, the Bolshevik Revolution, World War II and all the other horror stories of the past 100 + years would not have been possible.

Intrigued? Keep reading.

1- As outrageous and essential as their propaganda was, the belief that a newspaper circulation rivalry between Hearst and Pulitzer caused the war, as the first cartoon above suggests, is just as moronic.

2- The shocking claim of Spaniards strip-searching American women was false.

As the turn of the century approached, America was strong, independent, and what the Globalists would call "isolationist" - a stupid propaganda term used to mock the desire to maintain peaceful commerce and neutral relations with foreign countries. The very thought of picking a fight overseas was as foreign to the American psyche as homosexual "marriage" or government housing.

The Globo-Zionist crime gang was not nearly as entrenched among the American elite as it is today, but the pernicious influence of the New World Order was growing. Money Masters such as Jacob

1912: The #Faked #Shooting of #Teddy #Roosevelt

An original 'conspiracy theory' developed 

by TomatoBubble,com

The "lone nut" strikes again!

THE SETTING

1912: The popular incumbent President, William Howard Taft, refuses to follow the orders of the Globalist-Zionist crime syndicate that has already gained a foothold in America. Wall Street 'big shots' Bernard Baruch and Jacob Schiff plot his removal. To that end, Baruch (as confirmed by his one time assistant Benjamin Freedman) recruits the "progressive" Republican ex-President Theodore Roosevelt to run as a "3rd Party" candidate on the 'Bull Moose" platform. The aim is not to install Roosevelt, but rather to steal enough Republican votes form Taft so that Democrat Woodrow Wilson can become the next President.

In the fall of 1912, Taft still has a chance at winning; but that chance is about to disappear. Just 3 weeks before the election, an “October Surprise” comes in the form of a very convenient "assassination attempt" against Teddy Roosevelt. 

The big boys of Wall Street want Taft out and Wilson in. Roosevelt's role was to split the Republican vote and elect Wilson.

Image 1: Kuhn, Loeb, Baruch, Morgan, Meyer, P. Warburg, M.Warburg, Schiff, Brandeis, A. Rothschild.

Image 2: Wilson, Roosevelt, Taft

How The #Spanish #American #War Changed The #World

Teddy Roosevelt's mythical horseback charge up San Juan Hill 

catapulted him to national prominence.

tomatobubble,com

High School history fables taught us that the Spanish-American War of 1898 was a meaningless war instigated by the Yellow Journalist William Randolph Hearst. Here's a typical history-book sample of the retarded drivel that is still being spoon-fed to captive audiences of dumbed down students:

"It is arguable that the Spanish-American War was perhaps the most pointless war in the history of the United States. Although it was not known at the time, the war was not truly fought for territory, for markets, for principle, or even for honor. Rather, it began because William Randolph Hearst, editor of the popular New York Journal sought sensational material to print."

Certainly, Hearst and his Jewish rival at the New York World, Joseph Pulitzer, helped to poison the public mind towards Spain. But this idiotic and incomplete analysis ignores the "big picture" of the Globalist hand which moves the chess pieces. The Spanish-American War was neither "pointless", nor insignificant. To the contrary, without the precedent-setting features, tactical acquisitions, and adverse side-effects of this unjust war, and the prolonged US-Philippines War which grew out of it, World War I, the Bolshevik Revolution, World War II and all the other horror stories of the past 100 + years would not have been possible.

Intrigued? Keep reading.

1- As outrageous and essential as their propaganda was, the belief that a newspaper circulation rivalry between Hearst and Pulitzer caused the war, as the first cartoon above suggests, is just as moronic.

2- The shocking claim of Spaniards strip-searching American women was false.

As the turn of the century approached, America was strong, independent, and what the Globalists would call "isolationist" - a stupid propaganda term used to mock the desire to maintain peaceful commerce and neutral relations with foreign countries. The very thought of picking a fight overseas was as foreign to the American psyche as homosexual "marriage" or government housing.

The Globo-Zionist crime gang was not nearly as entrenched among the American elite as it is today, but the pernicious influence of the New World Order was growing. Money Masters such as Jacob Schiff, John Rockefeller, JP Morgan and others were already on board with the Globalist movement; as were media moguls like Adolph Ochs(NY Times), and the aforementioned Hearst and Pulitzer. America's potential as a global 'hit-man' for the NWO was not lost upon these One Worlders, particularly in regard to establishing a menacing naval presence from which the emerging U.S. bully could influence the affairs of Asia. Thus was born the idea for the first "Asian pivot" - the theft of the Spanish colonies of Guam and the Philippines.

The "problem" of overcoming American "isolationism" posed a challenge for the Globalists. Americans wanted as much to do with the affairs of Asia as they did of Mars or Venus. Besides, Spain wasn't about to give away territories which it had benevolently ruled for more than three centuries. Concurrent with the desire to take Guam and the Philippines was a movement to annex Hawaii and make it an American territory. But in 1897, the annexation movement stalled due to the strong opposition of native Hawaiians and the inability of supporters to win a 2/3 majority in the U.S. Senate. What's a Globalist to do?