by: October 14, 2022
(NaturalHealth365) Blanket statements like “follow the science” suggest that one should abide by governmental public health recommendations without question. Notably, individuals who make such statements tend to do so with an air that implies anyone who questions or declines “official” recommendations is, at best, worthy of derision and, at worst worthy of social ostracizing. But when an esteemed peer-reviewed journal like BMJ gives a voice to dire concerns about COVID jab clinical trial data, or lack thereof, then you know it’s neither conspiratorial nor “fringe” to have your reservations!
The reality is that science is dynamic and evolves. New information – often hidden behind a paywall – can be unearthed months or even years later regarding the true safety and efficacy of products within a wide range of industries, from pharmaceuticals to agriculture. For this reason, we applaud anyone who calls for greater transparency now from pharmaceutical companies and the government agencies who support them.
Researchers write “Open letter to the CEOs of Pfizer and Moderna,” calling for “transparency, reproducibility, and replication” of clinical trial data